LastWordArmy
Registered User
A deep dive into the Montreal Canadiens Prospects
http://lastwordonhockey.com/2017/08/21/tsp-montreal-canadiens-prospects/
http://lastwordonhockey.com/2017/08/21/tsp-montreal-canadiens-prospects/
I'm not saying that Scherbak is a bust. I'm saying that we'll know this year if he is a bust or not.I don't think Scherbak is a bust, nor do i think at 21 this is is his last season to make it.
I also think that Mete is the most exciting prospect, even if he's not a sure thing to make the NHL. The upside is potentially very high with his skating ability.
Also more I watch of Poehling, more of a fan I am.
I don't think anyone with a supposedly low upside is a sure NHLer, especially not Juulsen who has alleged concussion issues. A low upside means they're replaceable, they're not unique and don't stand out.First time I see a ranking that is similar to mine.
No.1 - Juulsen (low upside, but a sure NHLer)
I'm not saying that Scherbak is a bust. I'm saying that we'll know this year if he is a bust or not.
Offensive forwards like him have seen a few NHL games at their age... Don't forget that Draisaitl, Elhers, Reinhart, Bennett, Pastrnak, Larkin, Nylander, Arvidsson and Fabbri were all drafted the same year.
I never saw Alzner as a player with a big upside. Juulsen will be that kind of defesman.I don't think anyone with a supposedly low upside is a sure NHLer, especially not Juulsen who has alleged concussion issues. A low upside means they're replaceable, they're not unique and don't stand out.
Why would an organisation take risks with a youngster with low upside when they can pick up a Jordie Benn or whatever other journeyman professional d-man?
I'm not saying that Scherbak is a bust. I'm saying that we'll know this year if he is a bust or not.
Offensive forwards like him have seen a few NHL games at their age... Don't forget that Draisaitl, Elhers, Reinhart, Bennett, Pastrnak, Larkin, Nylander, Arvidsson and Fabbri were all drafted the same year.
5 of those guys are top 15 picks.
Players develop at different rates though, and he's 21. We need to see him take a step forward this year, but even if he doesn't make the NHL, that still doesn't make him a bust. He's still young. As long as he's progressing. .
Apart from Arvidsson who was drafted as a 21 years old, they were all picked before Scherbak.
Not counting Arvidsson, only 2 guys played almost a full season worth of games (Dvorak with 79 games and double overager Tryamkin with 78 games), both on struggling team.
Brayden Point is next with 68 games, followed by Labanc and Kase at around 50 games.
Barbashev and Forsling are the only other ones with 30 games or more.
Nah, his play is more reminiscent of someone like Stralman than someone like Alzner.I never saw Alzner as a player with a big upside. Juulsen will be that kind of defesman.
Nah, his play is more reminiscent of someone like Stralman than someone like Alzner.
Nah, his play is more reminiscent of someone like Stralman than someone like Alzner.
First time I see a ranking that is similar to mine.
No.1 - Juulsen (low upside, but a sure NHLer)
No.2 - Lindgren (I've been saying for over a year now that he was our prospect with the best value after Sergachev)
No.3 - Mete (according to what I've seen from him, he's a top 5 for sure, but not a sure NHLer)
No.4 - Phoeling (To me he should be in front of Juulsen only because his upside is greater)
No.5 - Sherbak (Has all the tools, but sadly lacks hockey intelligence. This season is his last opportunity to show the organization he is not a bust)
No.6 - Hudon (this kid is and will be a valuable asset if he plays with talented linemates. I would have him in the top 5)
No.8 - Ikonen (According to what I've seen from this guy, he also deserves to be higher on this list... at least ahead of Sherbak.
Being projected as a second pairing defenseman isnt what I call low upside personally..
I prefer having a future Hedman on my team than a future Petry. That's my point.If you get a top 6 forward or top 4 defenceman drafting in the 20s, you've done very well. (not that Juulsen has proven that yet, but just saying).
Juulsen definetely has more offense in his game than Alzner.
I prefer having a future Hedman on my team than a future Petry. That's my point.
I prefer having a future Hedman on my team than a future Petry. That's my point.
There's no point being made as everybody would rather have a future Hedman than a future Petry, who is pretty good in his own sake.I prefer having a future Hedman on my team than a future Petry. That's my point.
By trading Drouin to Tampa for Sergachev quite obviously.And how are the Habs gonna get a future Hedman?
So let's say our top 2 or 2 of our top 5 prospects (Juulsen & Lindgren) are in positions we have long term contracts in on the current team. How exactly is Berg going to get value out of them?
Any GM can see those players have extremely limited roles with the current contacts in place, so they have the leverage in any trade negotiations. Moving Petry (not the easiest contract to move, but moveable) or Juulsen before he becomes another "bust" and loses value for Centres or LHD of equal value is going to be a hard sell.
Price is obviously blocking Lindgren and I wouldn't think he would hold much value with little to no NHL experience. Weber isn't going anywhere either of course.
Any teams have holes with RHD or Goal prospects and have an abundance of centre or LHD youngsters? Can Juulsen play the Left side?
Why can't Juulsen just play on the third pair till Petry's contract expires and then take his spot?
Two years in the AHL then he takes Benn's spot on the third pair as his contract expires in two years, two years on the third pair and then takes Petry's spot when his contract expires. Juulsen will be 24 years old when Petry's contract expires.
Lindgren is probably going to become the backup when Montoya's contract expires.
Why can't Juulsen just play on the third pair till Petry's contract expires and then take his spot?
Two years in the AHL then he takes Benn's spot on the third pair as his contract expires in two years
Of course it would be great to see our current crop of prospects bloom in the AHL and follow their projection path, I was talking about the current pool as assets in order to compete in our current window.
Do you have faith that Juulsen will develop the way he should in our current AHL system? Unfortunately I don't see it right now, but would love to be proven wrong.