Trading for First-Round Draft Picks

Discussion in 'Calgary Flames' started by Signature, Oct 1, 2013.

View Users: View Users
  1. Signature

    Signature #keepyourstickontheice

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8,089
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The Flames are likely to be a bottom 5 team in the league this season and are popular frontrunners for drafting one of Aaron Ekblad or Sam Reinhart. However, it has been circulated that the 2014 draft overall is a much shallower draft past the first 5 prospects.

    Assuming Calgary does obtain one of Reinhart or Ekblad and they are able to contribute to the big club immediately and thus manage to somehow put the club into the 5-9 draft pick range for 2015 but they clearly need a game-changing prospect like a McDavid, should the team set their eyes on trying to obtain more first-round picks from the 2015 draft now through trade in a bid to move up through lottery or whatever circumstance in order to obtain better prospects?
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2013
  2. Deebious

    Deebious Legendary

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2008
    Messages:
    33,341
    Likes Received:
    771
    Trophy Points:
    169
    Occupation:
    Calgary
    Location:
    Calgary
    I don't know
















    From what I've heard, the 2014 draft is weaker than both 2015 and what 2013 was. So I guess go for 2015 picks?
     
  3. Anglesmith

    Anglesmith Setting up the play?

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2012
    Messages:
    38,156
    Likes Received:
    3,058
    Trophy Points:
    162
    Occupation:
    Scientist
    Location:
    Victoria
    Given we should only be a few years away from having our team pretty much built, I don't think it is a good idea to intentionally delay our draft choices. Predictions of the strength of one draft vs. another have historically been an inconsistent endeavour at best, and the sooner we draft guys, the sooner they're ready to help us, and the closer in age to our current rising stars they will be.

    However, I think our main priority should be whichever picks the other team covets less. If they will give us a better return with a 2015 pick than a 2014, I'd take that 2015 and make the opposite argument.
     
  4. SmellOfVictory

    SmellOfVictory Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,713
    Likes Received:
    494
    Trophy Points:
    124
    If they're first round picks, I'd say go for 2015 every time. Second round or later, and 2014 is probably preferable due to the prospects being ready a little more quickly. The first round picks are solely on the strength of the fact that a given team may miss the playoffs, thus increasing Calgary's chance of winning the McDavid lottery.
     
  5. InfinityIggy

    InfinityIggy No Longer Flammable

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    30,491
    Likes Received:
    2,124
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    59.6097709,16.5425901
    If we can move our 2014 2nd + ? for a 2015 1st, id do it.
     
  6. Signature

    Signature #keepyourstickontheice

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8,089
    Likes Received:
    370
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry, I edited the post. I did mean for first-round picks in either 2014 or 2015.
     
  7. herashak

    herashak Registered User

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2013
    Messages:
    4,713
    Likes Received:
    130
    Trophy Points:
    82
    How i see it is. trade away the filler in 2014 (stajan, cammy, stempniak, possibly hudler, jackman for anything, etc...). then in 2015 look at how our d is progressing and we could trade away gio maybe trade away glenncross for a cup run if he wants. all deals made around the deadline.
     
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2013
  8. Gritty

    Gritty F l a m e s

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    7,321
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    56
    Location:
    Fort McMurray
    Great post. Sums up my thoughts on this subject.
     
  9. Dube Dube Doo

    Dube Dube Doo The calls are coming from inside the house!

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2009
    Messages:
    15,070
    Likes Received:
    1,601
    Trophy Points:
    158
    Location:
    12°22’13.32″N, 23°19’20.18″E
    Home Page:
    The 2015 draft hasn't been had a lot of analysis done to it. Remember these are 16 year old kids right now. It could turn out to be just as weak (or just as strong) as the 2014 draft.

    I don't think anyone other than perhaps Cammalleri gets a 1st round pick anyways. So my vote would be for "doesn't matter" and get the best (highest) picks they can.
     
  10. MarkGio

    MarkGio Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    12,533
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    96
    If you consider that 2014 picks will have a year extra of development and therefore able to help the Flames sooner, this might be the draft to focus on. Otherwise we're looking at a 5 year rebuild if you consider the few years of development before a draft pick pans out to expectations.
     
  11. MarkGio

    MarkGio Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    12,533
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Or what Wflames said ^^
     
  12. Calculon

    Calculon unholy acting talent

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2006
    Messages:
    15,024
    Likes Received:
    1,739
    Trophy Points:
    187
    Location:
    Error 503
    I don't know whether the 2014 draft is weak by itself, or weak compared to the 2013 draft class, which was considered much stronger than average. And I haven't heard much about the 2015 class, but I suspect that if it's being called strong right now, it's more likely due to McDavid than an overabundance of quality prospects.

    A lot can change in two years when it comes to talking about 15 and 16 years old. The 2015 draft could quite well mirror 2004, which was paper thin after Ovechkin/Malkin.

    But given the McDavid hype, it'll still probably be easier to obtain 2014 first rounders than 2015 ones, as few if any GM's, even one worried about their job, would want to give up a shot at McDavid, even if it's a slim one at that.

    I say target 2014. If the Flames can land at one more first round pick, perhaps they can try moving up to get a second top five pick using other assets, and of course that is assuming the Flames finish in the bottom five. That would get them a solid chance at landing a couple of Ekblad, Rienhart, Nylander, Draisaitl and whoever else looks promising.
     
  13. Demetric

    Demetric Registered User

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    581
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Under a Rock
    depends on the team getting the first from, if a team like pit, bos, la then just go for 2014 as they are 99% not going to miss the playoffs in 2015 so getting their 1st then wont help getting McDavid, but if it is a team like Islanders or Preditors where they are more of a possible bubble team or Vancouver a team that looks to be on the decline, try for the 2015. The more 1st of those that dont make the playoffs the more numbers you have in the hat for that lottery.

    This all depends on how highly real world GMs value that chance at McDavid, might not even be possible
     
  14. TheHudlinator

    TheHudlinator Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    21,692
    Likes Received:
    26
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Location:
    Victoria,BC
    I don't get what your saying. Are you saying we should trade for 2014 picks for 2015? Are you saying we should target 2015 draft picks in trade?
     
  15. Johnny Hoxville

    Johnny Hoxville The Return of a Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    32,228
    Likes Received:
    2,737
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Occupation:
    Manager
    Location:
    Calgary
    Great post, I agree with all this.
     
  16. MarkGio

    MarkGio Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    12,533
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    96
    This survey is bias and ridiculous!

    What about the 2016 draft?!
    Or even the 2017 draft!?

    I mean, I just heard about a 13 year old who has narcolepsy and can literally play hockey in HIS SLEEP!! If I recall, his name was Tom something.

    We need to trade Monahan and Baerstchi for first round picks now so that we can BOMB for TOM at the 2018 draft!
     
  17. Johnny Hoxville

    Johnny Hoxville The Return of a Legend

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Messages:
    32,228
    Likes Received:
    2,737
    Trophy Points:
    186
    Occupation:
    Manager
    Location:
    Calgary
    Was it Tom Pielon?
     
  18. MarkGio

    MarkGio Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    12,533
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    96
    Oh man, not even. Tom Pielon is going to be the next Gretzky, able to play hockey at a high level while in a coma. We need to find a way to draft him!
     
  19. InfinityIggy

    InfinityIggy No Longer Flammable

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2011
    Messages:
    30,491
    Likes Received:
    2,124
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Location:
    59.6097709,16.5425901
    Mark Pielon* Goaltending Phantasm to the Stars.
     
  20. No Draft

    No Draft Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    11,291
    Likes Received:
    811
    Trophy Points:
    214
    Occupation:
    Professional Fan
    Home Page:
    Dont you worry...they'll be in the top 5 for both 2014 and 1015
     
  21. marbsarebad

    marbsarebad Registered User

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2013
    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Occupation:
    Package Humper at UPS
    Location:
    Olympia, WA
    I say we pick a team to trade for 2015 first rounders that's kind of on a downward spiral, but still desperate for the cup this year to trade away their first-round.


    I'm thinking Vancouver or the Sharks.

    There's no other teams that are going to be bad next year that's not already bad this year that will give us picks.
     
  22. Flames1217

    Flames1217 Registered User

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2012
    Messages:
    1,071
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    71
    Personally I say we should push to gather another extremely high draft pick in this upcoming draft. With our pick and maybe another basement or borderline basement team we would be able to fill some major holes such as defence and right wing. What I am proposing drafting for example Ekblad and Vitranen. Vitranen could be huge for the flames as I see him being an ideal partner to play beside Monaham. Nothing to say about Ekblad as he is most likely going to be a very strong number one defencman in the show for quite a while.
     
  23. Rangediddy

    Rangediddy The puck was in

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    Messages:
    3,068
    Likes Received:
    268
    Trophy Points:
    95
    Ideally, yes, obtain as many 2015 first rounders you can get to increase the chance of winning the lottery and selecting first. McDavid is a franchise player, arguably in the 'generational talent' category. He's a game changer and would put the Flames in a good position for a long time.

    That being said, he would put 29 other teams in good positions as well and the cost to pry any other team's 1st from them will cost quite a bit more than Cammelleri.

    The best chance we have is taking a chance that a team that thinks it'll make playoffs next year but might not (like Vancouver, San Jose, Detroit, Islanders, Columbus, etc.) and give them players they think will help them make playoffs... which we then hope they won't. But the risk would be too high if they did make it.

    A smart person would target 2014 1st rounders because they're actually valued fairly, but if you can get a 2015, you have to.
     
  24. TylerSVT*

    TylerSVT* Guest


    I think it's more to do with, would you rather have a prospect in the system for a year developing, or having another possible chance at McDavid (assuming the 1st is from a non-playoff team).

    I want as many swings as possible for that 2015 draft, the team that gets McDavid is going to be a good team going forward.
     
  25. MarkGio

    MarkGio Registered User

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2010
    Messages:
    12,533
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    96
    I wouldn't dump my bank account to buy a 1000 lottery tickets. So why stack the deck for McDavid, when he might just fall to someone else regardless? Its not like we can have all 30 picks for the 2015 draft.

    Calgary might have a chance at McDavid on their own accord if they're going to do more selling at this deadline. That's an even more inexperienced team for the 2015 season!
     

Share This Page

monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"