s7ark
RIP
- Jul 3, 2003
- 27,579
- 174
Last thread passed 1000. Continue here.
Some posts
Some posts
I'm on the Vanek wagon, he's lethal on offense. That top six would be filthy. That would define splash in Edmonton.
The assets to get Vanek would be much better spent at centre or defence.
Oshie is literally good at every facet of the game except faceoffs. Speed, shot, passing, physicality, defence, whatever, he can do it all. He might be smaller than Perron, but he's far stronger and much better at protecting the puck. David Perron would just be another soft winger added to our top 6.
I would honestly give up anything we have besides the big 5 for Oshie, Nurse, and Klefbom for him (although if we involve Gagner in a trade for him, we better have a 2nd line center in mind). Something like Paajarvi+Marincin+Gagner+1st for Oshie+Berglund would be a heist for us. If we give up even decent assets for David Pillowron, I would break my keyboard.
Peter Mueller plays more of a gritty game these days. Gamble on him for bottom six depth.
Can u imagine if Buffalo ask Ebs, Maggy and Hallsy for Vanek.
Seems like a lot of people on this board DID NOT listen to Mact's presser on Friday.
He specifically said they are looking for MEAT in the top 6 to help the kids. When asked about the Ryan trade he said "we had the assets to do that" but we have that type of player....we have skill....we need to help that skill with some meat and if we can't find that meat we'll need to use out bottom 6.
How are you guys getting Vanek out of those comments?
i no. lols. wtf, amirite?
Can't imagine anyone is that stupid...
lol at wanting the softest player in the NW division in Mason ****ing Raymond
Vanek is 6'2 and 205lbs and isn't a perimeter player, he'd add lots of meat AND scoring to the top 6.
He takes lots of abuse from going to the net and fighting through checks in the dirty areas.
I think we may found our top offer sheet candidate folks. Exactly the type of "meat" we need in our lineup
http://www.sportingnews.com/nhl/sto...eets-rangers-derek-stepan-maple-leafs/slide/5
Based on your post I'm going to assume you haven't seen Vanek the last couple of years? He's got about as much meat and net drive game as Magpie.
MacT seems to be ok with RNH and Gagner as the 1-2 for now. And we do need another top 9 LWer. If we could get Vanek and Ehrhoff we'd be in the playoffs next season imo.
I proposed this late last night and still like it today. I think they might entertain a Hemsky + N Schultz + Marincin + 2014 1st + 2015/16 1st(Oilers choice) for Vanek + Ehrhoff.
Vanek has reportedly made them aware he isn't interested in going through a rebuild, and I am sure Ehrhoff isn't thrilled with the idea either, especially since he's signed for so long. Hemsky and Schultz are downgrades at both positions but Buffalo also gets a big, almost NHL ready puck moving D, and 2 extra 1sts in the next 3 years to help with their rebuild. They could even flip Hemsky at the deadline for more picks in a 'we're maximizing assets, not tanking' kinda deal.
We get a guy that could hit 40g for us playing with the talent our top 6 has, and the top4 left shooting puck moving D we need so badly.
Hall - Gagner - Eberle
Vanek - RNH - Yakupov
Paajarvi - Gordon - Jones
Smyth/Eager - Lander/Acton - Joensuu
Ehrhoff - Ference
Smid - Petry
Belov - Schultz
Larsen
Dubnyk
Labarbera
I have been saying this for 3 years now. I knew this day was coming. Offer sheet or trade for his rights. I would rather Stewart then Clarkson. Put him out with Nuge and Eberle.
Interesting...he would definitely look good on the left side, wouldn't want to overpay too much though.
And the couple games I saw last year I actually thought he looked pretty good. Granted it was only a couple gamer, and they could have been the only two good games he had all year
I'm really hoping that Eakins is going to be a big factor in accountability with the effort level of our players going forward.
Hemsky and N. Schultz are essentially cap dumps.
They'd want:
Paajarvi + Petry + 1st 2014 + Gernat/Musil
PRV + N.Schulz + 1st 2014 + Marincin + 1st 2016
Plus he won't be dropping the gloves if our top end talent gets pushed around. That's the meat and potatoes MacT is really talking about. Hartnell, Stewart, etc.
We need a physical presence to make a statment that our kids aren't to be messed with, which was far too easy to do the last few years. It was so frustrating to watch.
This is a reason why I'm so happy we acquired Ference. My guess is it will take next year as well to get all of the meat that Craig is looking for. Get ready for some MacT hockey gents.
First of all I realize every team that misses the playoffs is a "lottery" team and most people would know what I meant but I'm guessing you are just trying to be a smart ***. Secondly I have seen him play about 30-40 times so it's best not to bet money on something you have no idea about. I followed him before his draft year in 2006 and followed him a lot from 2006-2008 And then a bit when he was with HV71 and probably 2 games this year with the Islanders. He has progressed greatly since 2006. He's not fast by any means but much better than 2006 when he couldn't skate and had no balance. After seeing his skating progress I have become an even bigger fan of his. I predict this year he'll start 4th line and make his way onto the 3rd. I have no idea why you are bringing up MPS and jones as I know all about them and agree they are definately 3rd liners. Though Jones on the 4th line makes this team really deep team.
I agree we need those 3 postions but the lineup posted wasn't much different than last years tbh. But saying the bottom six won't affect whether the Oilers make it into the playoffs Is just wrong. It's depth players and role players that work hard to help a team into the playoffs. For example Boston and Chicago were both raved about for having a great bottom six. I wasn't writing the team off just saying as it stands the team isnt much better than last year. If lander makes a really solid jump to the NHL permanently, Joensuu plays as well as he did in Europe, jones plays like a year or two ago and Magnus keeps progressing then you are right that our bottom 6 will be fine.
If we could convince Buffalo to do something along those lines, we'd definitely look a lot better.
It'd be nice to add one more experienced RHD to the 2nd pairing if we could, how about signing Zidlicky to a 2-year deal.
Ehrhoff - Petry
Smid - Zidlicky
Ference - Schultz
Belov