Be a Hab
Registered User
- Sep 17, 2010
- 1,282
- 661
Can we please stop overpaying for Fowler. If we’re talking about Hampus Lindholm than I’m all for it.
Proposal: Trade Proposal Thread (Part VII)
- Thread starter Frenchy
- Start date
- Status
FF de Mars
Registered User
What about Burakovsky? Caps fans are arguing about trading him Player Discussion - Andre Burakovsky Looks like a reclamation project. Former 1st round pick, 23 years old, fast skating and all the tools but hasn't found his box yet, playing with Eller. Play him with a better passer in a new scenery and he might find his niche.
Sterling Archer
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2006
- 22,987
- 13,457
At $3.0M cap hit, he likely won't be qualified, maybe Washington will trade his rights cheap
Habs Icing
Formerly Onice
Well, at least you got us to walk out of that meeting still wearing our underwear.
eklund the clown
Registered User
- Dec 28, 2010
- 2,139
- 2,396
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
I'd like to acquire Burakovsky. Wonder if they would take Shaw? There are not getting any of our top 100 picks though. Maybe Shaw and a 5th?
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
I don't think your Fowler offer is terrible but we should move on from Fowler. Ducks just signed him for 8 years with a 4 team trade list.
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
Looking for a 3 way deal to try to see if all teams can address team needs... Leafs, Canes, Habs
Leafs Acquire:
- Hamilton (RD the Leafs need)
- 2019 2nd (Canes pick)
Canes Acquire:
- Nylander (Top 6 forward the Canes need)
- Juulsen (young NHL ready RD to replace trading Hamilton)
- 2019 3rd (Habs Pick)
Habs Acquire:
- Bean (young LD we need)
- Habs trade Juulsen and a 3rd for Bean who fits our LD needs.
- Leafs get the RD they need and trade Nylander. They get a 2nd for the term difference.
- Canes get younger. Hamilton and Bean for Nylander and Juulsen.
Thoughts?
Leafs Acquire:
- Hamilton (RD the Leafs need)
- 2019 2nd (Canes pick)
Canes Acquire:
- Nylander (Top 6 forward the Canes need)
- Juulsen (young NHL ready RD to replace trading Hamilton)
- 2019 3rd (Habs Pick)
Habs Acquire:
- Bean (young LD we need)
- Habs trade Juulsen and a 3rd for Bean who fits our LD needs.
- Leafs get the RD they need and trade Nylander. They get a 2nd for the term difference.
- Canes get younger. Hamilton and Bean for Nylander and Juulsen.
Thoughts?
Scintillating10
Registered User
I don't know Bean that well. But I can't see Canes moving Hamilton for Nylander. He has a terrible contract
Scintillating10
Registered User
Fowler is an option but I would not overpay. Gardiner in UFA still my top choice. At the draft i am thinking trade Petry for Gardiner, Sandin and Leafs #1 pick?
Scintillating10
Registered User
Poolparty could be of interest to us. Watched a bit of Flames/Oilers game Sat. night. Pool Party didn't play that bad. He has size and speed. He was once MVP of WJC so skill must be there. Habs souts take a look at him? If Oilers are trying to move him maybe a favorable trade could be had? He wouldn't be the first player Oilers have made a mistake on. Chance he may blossom on Koktaniemi, Lehkonen line.
habsfan891
Registered User
Why not cut out Toronto there's nothing going from Habs to them so they aren't needed for Juulsen and a 3rd for Bean
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
I don't think a top 6 talent at 6 years at $6.9M is terrible. He's just not trending well and he is having a hard time dealing with the extra pressure from the contract negotiations. At the end of the day, he is a top 6 talent.
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
Well, they would have to move one or two of their RD in oder to swap Bean for Juulsen. Why would they add a RD if they keep Hamilton and Faulk?
Scintillating10
Registered User
habsfan891
Registered User
Sure but why wouldn't that be a separate trade that would be their job to figure out if they really wanted Juulsen
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
Do you think Drouin had top 6 value last year? Nylander has talent, he is a top 6 forward. He's just not a dominate top 6 forward who creates time and space for himself... he needs to play on a line with other talent. Nylander is just not trending well... it happens to talent like this
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
Cause the Canes won't need Juulsen if they keep their RD's. So they might be interested if there was a 3 way deal where they improved their top 6 depth (Nylander) and unloaded Hamilton.
Are you saying they do a Juulsen and Bean swap before they trade some of their RD's who have soon to be UFA status?
habsfan891
Registered User
Nope I'm saying if they truly wanted Juulsen that badly they'd make room with a trade before they approached Bergevin
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
Doubt they are drooling to acquire Juulsen and try to make room for him cause he is better than their two top RD's. The idea is to soften the blow of trading the RD's for improvements up front and inserting a guy like Juulsen at the same time.
It likely falls through and they revisit the Juulsen/Bean swap at a later date once they see how good Fleury and Bean are on the Left side behind Slavin and CDH while they see who they want to keep (if any) from Hamilton and Falk on the right side. If a guy like Fox disappointed on the RD side, then maybe they consider adding Juulsen for Bean.
- Jun 24, 2012
- 83,921
- 151,198
Stéphane Leroux of RDS believes that Jake Evans, Cale Fleury, Joni Ikonen, Jesse Ylonen and Jacob Olofsson are the candidates (not all of them, but among this group) who could be used in a trade by MB to acquire a LHD within the mold of Jeff Petry. Adds that in any case, they can't all play for the Habs.
«À Laval, Evans et Fleury sont intéressants pour un possible échange, tout comme Joni Ikonen, Jesse Ylönen et Jacob Olofsson, même se ce dernier a été décevant au Championnat du monde junior. De toute manière, tous ces espoirs ne pourront pas jouer avec le Tricolore… Si c'est pour aller chercher un Jeff Petry gaucher, pourquoi pas ? Chose certaine, le Canadien a bien repêché aux cours des deux dernières années.»
https://www.985fm.ca/nouvelles/spor...en-pourraient-etre-echanges-en-vue-des-series
Only reason Leroux's opinion matters to an extent is that he has a close connection with Timmins. Chances are what Leroux is suggesting is not solely his own opinion.
«À Laval, Evans et Fleury sont intéressants pour un possible échange, tout comme Joni Ikonen, Jesse Ylönen et Jacob Olofsson, même se ce dernier a été décevant au Championnat du monde junior. De toute manière, tous ces espoirs ne pourront pas jouer avec le Tricolore… Si c'est pour aller chercher un Jeff Petry gaucher, pourquoi pas ? Chose certaine, le Canadien a bien repêché aux cours des deux dernières années.»
https://www.985fm.ca/nouvelles/spor...en-pourraient-etre-echanges-en-vue-des-series
Only reason Leroux's opinion matters to an extent is that he has a close connection with Timmins. Chances are what Leroux is suggesting is not solely his own opinion.
Habs Halifax
Loyal Habs Fan
Interesting evaluation of the two 2nd's we have. I'm curious to see names from who we can find in these separate ranges....
2nd round pick from 31-50
- Subban at 43rd
- Weber at 49
- Josi at 38
- Romanov at 38
2nd round picks from 51-60
- Lehkonen at 55
I need help. Trying to figure out the probability based on previous cherry pick hits and to evaluate our ability to hit with our two 2nd round picks we have in this draft that look to be 50+ range. Weber is the closest hit I can remember near 50. Most I remember are early part of the 2nd round.
Who are the hits from 50-60 range in previous drafts?
2nd round pick from 31-50
- Subban at 43rd
- Weber at 49
- Josi at 38
- Romanov at 38
2nd round picks from 51-60
- Lehkonen at 55
I need help. Trying to figure out the probability based on previous cherry pick hits and to evaluate our ability to hit with our two 2nd round picks we have in this draft that look to be 50+ range. Weber is the closest hit I can remember near 50. Most I remember are early part of the 2nd round.
Who are the hits from 50-60 range in previous drafts?
- Status
