BUX7PHX
Registered User
- Jul 7, 2011
- 5,581
- 1,350
Oh, and the Strome talk is a because he didn't perform well in the CHL playoffs. A month ago he an "untouchable"
Not really. If AZ does not win the lottery, there is a miniscule chance of trading Strome. That is the contingency to trading Strome.
You expect us to be interested in Dahlbeck? Please, try and understand the needs of the team you are trading with just a little bit. WE DON'T NEED MORE D, ESPECIALLY MEDIOCRE D! He has less than zero value to us.
So, you are expecting us to trade a 105 for a 157, which obviously favors you, and a #7 for a Scandella and a 15, which again favors you. The difference between a 7 and a 15, especially in this draft, is not a mid 20's top4 D on a good contract.
That's a bad, bad deal for the Wild.
A lot of this is about the potential roster issues that the Wild may have going forward. Given, there is time to figure this out, but the NMCs and lengths of contracts given out may drive value down lower once the expansion draft list is complete. I don't view any of the D in this situation without an NMC as being worth a top 10 pick in return, and some of that has to also do with the fact that at least one of them has to be exposed for nothing. 1st round values, sure. Teams that are trading for one of these D also have to be able to protect that player as well, so a team may be less likely to deal a pick/prospect that doesn't need protection for a player that does. A lot of moving parts here.
Everything points in the direction of the player value lessening over time, but we shall see.