OMG67
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 10,780
- 6,939
That’s why it makes ZERO sense for a middle-of-the-road team to deal away picks when their ceiling is winning a round or two max in the playoffs.
Example - - Oshawa pissed away five draft picks and only improved marginally. They should have sold off a couple pieces and added picks.
I liked the low level of picks Oshawa traded for Punnett. I think that was a very good trade regardless. For similar or even weaker players, teams paid 2nd, 3rd, 5th…
I do feel Oshawa should have traded away assets this year BUT the issue is for When? Next year? Meh. Missy will likely run away with the Conference post-deadline.
To me, Oshawa would have needed to commit to trading Kumpalainen, Roobroek and D’Amato. All three could potentially return next season which I think is the reason why they didn’t trade those guys.
I don’t feel Oshawa was in as cut and dry position as some others. To me, Kingston should have traded Ludwinski. His singular value vs anyone on the Generals roster was night and day. Kingston still could have done well this season adding Dubois to replace Ludwinski and netted a solid return without hurting the team too much, while shifting some assets forward.