16thOverallSaveUs
Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
- May 2, 2018
- 18,795
- 11,752
Yes. I challenge the assumption that we need to "get value" for him in a trade "rather than losing him for nothing."Are we okay letting Dumba walk for free instead of using him as a trade chip, even if it's a minor trade?
Russo Speculation Alert: “50/50 chance Fiala gets moved”
Yes. I challenge the assumption that we need to "get value" for him in a trade "rather than losing him for nothing."
We do not lose him for nothing. He takes an expansion bullet for the team, we gain $6m in cap space, and we get to keep both of our goalies.
Those things have significant value this summer.
Just considering the team's strengths, weaknesses and cap situation, I think 50/50 is about where it should be. I absolutely want him back next year, but it's hard to figure out how this team gets better down the middle without sending out both quality and cap. Like Dumba, Fiala checks both of those boxes and has no trade protection.Russo Speculation Alert: “50/50 chance Fiala gets moved”
Just considering the team's strengths, weaknesses and cap situation, I think 50/50 is about where it should be. I absolutely want him back next year, but it's hard to figure out how this team gets better down the middle without sending out both quality and cap. Like Dumba, Fiala checks both of those boxes and has no trade protection.
He doesn't have to say, nor should he say, that his centers are crap. All he has to do is say something vague, like, "We are always looking to upgrade our team, whatever the position."Either he's not tipping his hand, or we're going to be on the hunt for a new GM soon. I don't believe anyone that looks at the Wild's collection of centers and go, yep I'm happy with how they performed.
Can confirm, and was kind of surprised to hear that. If he is traded, it better be for a big return. He helps make us a fast, explosive, dangerous team. If he actually got some linemates, who knows how good he could be.Russo Speculation Alert: “50/50 chance Fiala gets moved”
im actually wondering if it might be easier to stomach losing fiala than dumba in expansion due solely to the dollars and term he may be getting, and boldy stepping in
This would make me legitimately angry.
but would the team be better for it?
im actually wondering if it might be easier to stomach losing fiala than dumba in expansion due solely to the dollars and term he may be getting, and boldy stepping in
link?Russo Speculation Alert: “50/50 chance Fiala gets moved”
No. I'm not thrilled about which of our defensemen have ended up with the NMCs, but we do have 5 very good ones, and some good RD prospects to boot. We can absorb his loss better than we can absorb Fiala's.but would the team be better for it?
No, a team who's strength is defined by its defensive core would not rather lose one of 3 viable offensive weapons over a guy who can be your 2nd-5th best defensemen depending on the night. A team that has struggled to ice any sort of potential high end skill in their forward group for a decade would not be better off. If Fiala goes, its for return down the middle.but would the team be better for it?
Neither is the list of things Guerin’s done to instill confidence that he’s capable of being a GM. Could be a recipe for disaster.The list of centers it would make sense to trade Fiala for isn't very long. Especially if you take into consideration those that would actually be available.
same argument used for dumba could be used for fiala. Except dumbas position is more valuable.
The only thing that's ever come to mind for me, and it isn't realistic, is Horvat. Benning does seem poised to something, or a series of somethings, that don't make a ton of sense. Horvat's on a good contract, I don't think they have an easy way to replace him besides moving Miller back to center, and they'll run into the "money in, money out" problem as much as any other team... but still, Benning isn't all that predictable.Which teams would even want Fiala, that have some sort of top 6 center to give up?
Vilardi
Zacha/?
Kuznetsov
Stamkos
Schmaltz/Dvorak
Couture
Kadri
RNH
Monahan
Nylander
I understand the need for a center but most of these are terrible. Who else might realistically be moved for a winger like Fiala?
The only thing that's ever come to mind for me, and it isn't realistic, is Horvat. Benning does seem poised to something, or a series of somethings, that don't make a ton of sense. Horvat's on a good contract, I don't think they have an easy way to replace him besides moving Miller back to center, and they'll run into the "money in, money out" problem as much as any other team... but still, Benning isn't all that predictable.
But I agree, unless Fiala was included in a deal for Eichel there aren't many options that jump out.
Somewhat along those lines, I do kind of wonder about Florida. Like the Kings they seem to be looking to be aggressive this summer and Zito's got Fenton as an AGM. It'd take a lot to pry Lundell away from them, but Fiala is a lot.Yeah, Horvat could work, I just don't think it's that realistic, even with Benning in control. He's a very important player for them, and their captain.
I always come back to Vilardi as someone I like that's maybe realistic. About to turn 22, 37ish point pace in his first "full" season. Could be poised to break out some more next year. LA has the center depth to spare.
I very much don't like the argument being used for Dumba either.
Somewhat along those lines, I do kind of wonder about Florida. Like the Kings they seem to be looking to be aggressive this summer and Zito's got Fenton as an AGM. It'd take a lot to pry Lundell away from them, but Fiala is a lot.
Kind of breaks my own assumption about Guerin not willingly taking a step back next year, but you never know.