Proposal: Toronto- Vancouver

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoodbyeLuongo

Registered User
Jun 8, 2012
1,927
638
Seattle
Just heard on the radio out here the Leafs have a lot of interest in Markstrom. I’m wonder if a trade where the Canucks help the Leafs by taking Andy, and the Leafs get the rights to Marky is a good deal fir both teams?

Not unless TOR is taking another contract back
 

bandwagonesque

I eat Kraft Dinner and I vote
Mar 5, 2014
7,145
5,454
Just heard on the radio out here the Leafs have a lot of interest in Markstrom. I’m wonder if a trade where the Canucks help the Leafs by taking Andy, and the Leafs get the rights to Marky is a good deal fir both teams?
Eriksson at 50% -- ie, $1.25M real salary per season -- probably wouldn't require Demko or a 1st to dump.

EDIT: responded to the wrong post
 

JAK

Non-registered User
Jul 10, 2010
3,704
2,584
Both teams strapped for cap. There is just not any great fit IMO.

Unless Leafs wants to spend prospects and picks to get a third team to retain cap going both ways.

Hey Ottawa, you guys have lots of space sitting there doing nothing. Right?
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
Yeah, that's horrible for the Canucks. The Canucks would have $8.3 million in salary from adding one extra player ($6.9 for Johnsson and Kerfoot and $2.4 million from Eriksson). If they move Eriksson, it's to cut cap, not add it. Especially since they would need a backup as well.

It's the equivalent of Virtanen and Sutter for Anderson at 30%, Liljergen and a 1st. Makes no sense for Toronto and it makes no sense for Vancouver.

wait freddie andersen @30% is the same as eriksson @40%?

lol
 

Canucks LB

My Favourite, Gone too soon, RIP Luc, We miss you
Oct 12, 2008
76,533
28,910
No disrespect at all, but this is the worst proposal of the year
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad