Proposal: Toronto - Vancouver

[Space Coyote]

Nylander

for

Hutton + Virtanen

Toronto need depth on D. Hutton will be a decent #3 and also Virtanen who still has the potential to be a top 6 F as hes still young.


Canucks can spare Hutton as they already have depth on D for skilled winger like Willie.

Click to read more...

 

[CatchyTune]

We would need Tanev if you want Nylander

 

[Morning Dart]

Not trading an elite talent for a "decent #3" and a guy trending bust. You'd have a hard time convincing half of our fanbase to trade Nylander for Tanev straight up and that's our biggest weakness moving forward. Try harder.

 

[Syckle78]

Horrendous for Toronto.

 

[WTFMAN99]

Vancouver doesn't have the (expendable) assets to land Nylander.

 

[tony d]

Toronto's not doing that. Vancouver wants Nylander, a 2017 1st has to be headed back to Toronto.

 

[WilliamNylander]

You literally have nothing worth Nylander.

Lol at Virtanen, come on man.

 

[Liferleafer]

Nylander

for

Hutton + Virtanen

Toronto need depth on D. Hutton will be a decent #3 and also Virtanen who still has the potential to be a top 6 F as hes still young.


Canucks can spare Hutton as they already have depth on D for skilled winger like Willie.

Respectfully and politely pass. If Nylander is made available, it would need to be a similarly aged and skilled RHD. So, it would need to be a young Dman equal in value to a rookie forward with 42 points and on pace for 60ish. Hutton doesn't fill that criteria.

 

[LondonKendrick]

There is nothing on Vancouver's roster or in their system that would entice the Leafs to trade Nylander, there is one in this draft that would worth trading Nylander for at this moment so even the Nucks 1st pick is sufficient.

Literally no deal possible from the Canucks for Nylander.

 

[AINEC*]

Decent #3 and a bust. It's an enticing offer but I'd rather keep Bill

 

[LeafGm]

This idea is on the same level as suggesting that the Canucks should trade Bo Horvat to the Leafs for Connor Carrick & Freddie Gauthier.

 

[BAM]

Nothing on the Canucks is worth giving up Nylander for

 

[Trapper]

We would need Tanev if you want Nylander

We would not trade Nylander for Tanev.
Also no to Hutton/Virtanen.

There is no deal for Nylander.

 

[Leafs87]

I can't see the leafs parting with Nylander. He Marner and Matthews are the backbone to out forward group. No doubt we need D but the leafs will be patient and obtain them without moving those 3

 

[TOGuy14]

Nylander

for

Hutton + Virtanen

Toronto need depth on D. Hutton will be a decent #3 and also Virtanen who still has the potential to be a top 6 F as hes still young.


Canucks can spare Hutton as they already have depth on D for skilled winger like Willie.

How about Carrick + Rychel for Horvat too while we are at it

 

[Top Chedz]

Nylander is going to be a #1B being Matthews at C. He may be the easiest of the big 3 to obtain, but even still, his value is astronomical and he's getting better and better every game.

I'd want Juolevi+1st+a good roster player to just get the conversation started.

 

[CantLoseWithMatthews]

Terrible offer

 

[Mike Hasselhoffman]

Ouch that's bad for Toronto...Nylander gets overshadowed by Matthews and Marner, but let's not forget just how good this kid is, like his ability to find an open passing lane is just ridiculous. I doubt Toronto will move him for anything short of an established star in his prime.

 

[M2Beezy]

If Benning was the GM of Toronto i could see this but Toronto management seems smart so no way theyd get ripped off like this as much as Id love it

 

[ACC1224]

Nylander

for

Hutton + Virtanen

Toronto need depth on D. Hutton will be a decent #3 and also Virtanen who still has the potential to be a top 6 F as hes still young.


Canucks can spare Hutton as they already have depth on D for skilled winger like Willie.

Easy pass.

 

[M2Beezy]

For the Canucks this thread is kinda sad cause Jim could of just drafted Nylander and we could of kept him and Hutton. But hey Virtanen has meat and potatos and can rip the puck from the neutral zone like really good so...

 

[PetterssonSimp]

Shoe meet other foot. Other foot, meet shoe.

 

[Top Chedz]

For the Canucks this thread is kinda sad cause Jim could of just drafted Nylander and we could of kept him and Hutton. But hey Virtanen has meat and potatos and can rip the puck from the neutral zone like really good so...

Speaking of Virtanen whats up with him!?

11pts over 41 games in the AHL? I don't follow him but I had no idea his stats were so mediocre.

 

[Walshy7]

Speaking of Virtanen whats up with him!?

11pts over 41 games in the AHL? I don't follow him but I had no idea his stats were so mediocre.

whoa I knew he is struggling but not like that, canucks could of went off the board and taken Kapanen and got a better player (currently, who knows future) Kap was picked 16 spots later (22OA)

 

[dellzor]

Speaking of Virtanen whats up with him!?

11pts over 41 games in the AHL? I don't follow him but I had no idea his stats were so mediocre.

Confidence got killed

Bad work ethic

Came to the season out of shape

Floats