binop7
Registered User
- Jul 4, 2011
- 5,071
- 946
Meh...on paper a team with the names they have shouldn't be this bad.
Landeskog (not to single him out) looks better on paper than he does on the ice
Meh...on paper a team with the names they have shouldn't be this bad.
Can't tell if srs
One example among many, many others. You only reveal how little you pay attention when you seriously suggest that Nylander playing reduced minutes and bouncing around the lineup is some sort of unprecedented treatment.
he's the least talented player on the team and the only reason his gets noticed is because he plays with our franchise player
I bet Nylander would. ....if he tried hard.
Landeskog (not to single him out) looks better on paper than he does on the ice
It's not that bad but I can say that Babcock plays favorites.
Not quite sure about Hyman being gone in 4 years...the Red Wings gave Cleary three straight 1-year contracts to be Babcock's pet.
I don't think there's anything wrong with keeping him around, but at some point he's got to get off Matthews' wing.
Your point being..?you brought that example up
maybe you should answer the question
Patrick Roy is the issue with the Avs.
Hf told me so!
Landeskog (not to single him out) looks better on paper than he does on the ice
Not quite sure about Hyman being gone in 4 years...the Red Wings gave Cleary three straight 1-year contracts to be Babcock's pet.
I don't think there's anything wrong with keeping him around, but at some point he's got to get off Matthews' wing.
Works hard but is a head case....hence the trade of Reilly
Hyman will be here on one of the bottom lines for years. He just expects a hell of a lot more from Nylander.
What Babs doesn't want is allowing certain players (because of their talent level) to not get their jerseys dirty. That's why Kessel isn't here.