For me it's not about the fact he's a 4th liner who has played before. There's many things at play here.
#1 is Babcock's ego. Media have talked for weeks about how Babcock didn't want Dubas to sign Spezza. This was just Babcock flexing his lineup options as if people are paying to watch him coach.
#2 is just the respect factor and how we need veteran guys to want to come play here for cheap. Disrespect those kinds of guys by saying they need more PK practicing...not how to appeal to future veterans who may be in the same position.
#3 is that Shore didn't outplay anyone during camp. If Spezza was replaced by someone really younger like a Sandin who outplayed him drastically...no issue. But Shore didn't outplay anyone. So Spezza signed here to start below guys like that on our depth chart? Completely killing any message Dubas would have given him during the FA process as well? Not a good look for the coach.
#4 is how that if you can't see how an NHL veteran from Toronto would view a Leafs home opener as a special event in his career then any words I use are not going to change any view you have on this topic. Add in who the opposition was...more emotion for that player involved in that other jersey....and it's hard to not see how Babcock just used the opportunity to put a spotlight on himself for absolutely zero reason. Which is another issue...and the main one why if he hits a road bump this season...Dubas will happily put his own coach in charge and rid himself of these head games that Babcock insists on playing for some reason.
#1 didn't babcock take point and had a huge conversation with Spezza? Why would he do that if he didn't want Dubas to sign Spezza? (and then that's with the whole. Babcock v. Dubas thing). I don't think he would do that just to do it (if he didn't want to? maybe he would, i dunno).
#2 legitimate questions here - why is it embarrassment if (just taking it at face value) that's the truth? I don't remember Babcock saying it maliciously (and we've seen babcock say a lot of cutting remarks in the media very sharply). and in the argument of "why the better team?" maybe that should be seen more of a compliment - especially if there's a platoon going on. If Shore is just meh - even though it stings not being in the opener, isn't it more trusting that he
is vs. the better team and someone they could meet in the playoffs vs Shore and what everyone called an AHL line up?
#3: Did Spezza outplay anyone? again - are we going to say that Spezza and Babcock haven't had
any communication?
and #4: i never said that Spezza wouldn't see this as a special event. what I am asking is why are Spezza's feelings more important than anyone else's in that situation, and it just seems to me people are going 'vet/cheap contract, Toronto etc." which valid. but i would think Spezza (who has had a lot of special moments in his career) vs. shore who was out of the league last year, and who made an O6 team who has a very strong chance to win the stanley cup and who has probably never had a moment like this at all in his career. It's about Spezza and his feelings. and i am like if they both were meh at camp, we're deploying a platoon, and if Spezza's the stronger choice, then while it sucks that he didn't get a special moment, we get to use him vs a better team, which should be the more important thing here.
now for me - I don't see this as Babcock making it about "himself" and I don't think this is any kind of shot across the bow at Dubas. (because again if it were, we've
seen Malicious Babcock in the media, and i've seen all the videos/clips (posted). not to mention as was pointed out by several people. Babcock got roasted for gifting vets. so he doesn't and he's getting roasted for not doing it basically indicating people are never gonna be happy with how he decides to do/justify things that he does. I've got my glitches with Babcock, goodness gracious knows I do, but honestly in this case i personally don't think this is one of them. (and nor do i think this is part of some war between Babcock and Dubas).