Top players ignored by Vegas at expansion draft?

Jee

uwu
Aug 25, 2006
30,021
12,741
Montréal
how was he a 13th forward last year when he finished 6th in scoring for the Habs. I mean I know they sucked bad last year but he still outscored most of his teammates and if he didn't miss 10 games his ppg was on pace to put the same numbers as Byron so then only 5 players would have out produced him all while mostly playing with the black hole of offense as his center in Pleks.

He's an obvious Habs hater, you won't talk him into sense. Don't waste your time with him.
 

Daximus

Wow, what a terrific audience.
Sponsor
Oct 11, 2014
38,972
24,983
Five Hills
They could have had a good bottom 6 player from the Jets but opted for the 1st rounder instead which got them Suzuki, which got them Pacioretty. We'll see how that works out for them.
 

CupInSIX

My cap runneth over
Jul 1, 2012
26,283
18,254
Alphaville
yeah Grabner would have been a much better pick than Oscar Lindberg in hindsight

Despite the salary cost, Soderberg is still quite a bit better than Pickard whom Vegas lost for basically nothing.

They traded him to the Leafs for a 6th and Toby Lindberg.

They could have had a good bottom 6 player from the Jets but opted for the 1st rounder instead which got them Suzuki, which got them Pacioretty. We'll see how that works out for them.

I think the whole deal was they got to move up in the 1st round (plus a 3rd) if they didn't take anyone under contract. Enstrom waived his NMC but they still wanted to protect him.

So they wound up with Pacioretty in the end for picking Thorburn. Not bad.
 
Last edited:

voxel

Testicle Terrorist
Feb 14, 2007
19,967
4,382
Florida
Vegas should have picked up Khaira from the Oil. I was worried they would but they picked the bust :)
 

sharks9

Registered User
Jan 16, 2012
16,444
2,604
Canada
Emelin was turned into a very useful 3rd round pick so...no. No matter how many thousands upon thousands of times you talk up Charles 'the franchise' Hudon, and what an enormous, boneheaded, missed opportunity he was, he would have wound up like Leipsic on the outside looking in.

A more interesting thread would have been what the Habs would be like if they kept Subban and Sergachev.

How is it useful when they haven't even used it yet, and odds are the player won't become as effective as Hudon is now.
 

Balthazar

I haven't talked to the trainers yet
Sponsor
Apr 25, 2006
49,287
51,959
McPhee didn't want to build the future of that team on the expansion draft but on the entry draft. He selected a lot of dmen hoping to create scarcity and teams to trade picks for them. Didn't work as planned on all counts.
 

Garbage Goal

Registered User
Apr 1, 2009
22,699
4,591
Bellemare is by far the best 4th line center and the best PK:er in the NHL, Raffl is complete nobody,
Raffl > Bellemare is so not true, 1 lucky 21 goal season years ago, that's it.

Between your posts content, your username, and the explanation of your username below your username this is probably the weirdest post I’ve ever seen on HFBoards.
 

super6646

Registered User
Apr 16, 2018
17,882
15,730
Calgary
Think taking kulak over engelland would've been the smarter choice, but it's not like we had a lot of talent available anyway. 2020/2021 is gonna be way more problematic for us, as we almost certainly lose a bonafide top 4 dman or top 6 forward.
 
Last edited:

Pia8988

Registered User
May 26, 2014
14,375
8,796
Think taking kulak over engelland would've been the smarter choice, but it's not like we had a lot of talent available anyway. 2020 is gonna be way more problematic for us, as we almost certainly lose a bonafide top 4 dman or top 6 forward.

Engelland had the Vegas connection to help establish someone a bit local to the team. They also don't have any RHD. Kulak wouldn't break the top 3 LHD.
 

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
22,247
14,871
Honestly it's pretty easy to miss at least 10 players that were better when you are selecting from 30 other teams. The problem with that logic is you are supposed to select the best team, not the best players.

Considering Vegas went to the SCF, they literally had the best expansion draft in sports history. I doubt anyone on HF could have done half as good as Vegas did during the draft.

I mean yes....sorta. but OP is asking about any particular players that were left out whose stock has risen a lot since

ie Karlsson wasn't worth much b4 the draft but he blew up in Vegas since. Any other exposed players like that they skipped on? If so - that player wouldn't have likely hindered Vegas's "team" synergy - only helped.
 

Maukkis

EZ4ENCE
Mar 16, 2016
10,570
7,264
You have to ignore every team with which Vegas had side deals in place to take a specific player.

ANA: N/A
ARI: maybe Connauton, but then again, not much of a loss given their other picks
BOS: they crushed it with the Miller pick
BUF: nothing of significance out there anyway, even though they were only agreeing upon leaving Ullmark alone.
CGY: Engelland was picked for non-hockey reasons and still worked out. Funny, huh?
CAR: N/A
CHI: N/A
COL: Soderberg might be the first true miss they had in terms of ability, but they did pick a bunch of forwards of his caliber anyway. Moreover, his contract might have been the breaking point here.
CBJ: N/A
DAL: Pateryn belongs to that 'woulda been nice' category of players who would have been good additions, but not much of a loss there either.
DET: Ouellet, see above.
EDM: Khaira should have been the pick here. Being associated with Reinhart is just sad at this point.
FLA: N/A
LA: Getting McNabb from a team who protected four D anyway was a coup.
MIN: N/A
MTL: pretty much anyone would have beaten Emelin, but seconding the Hudon nomination here. Davidson would have worked too.
NSH: Neal was the BPA without question.
NJ: Oh, the irony... Smith-Pelly was available for Vegas. Must mention him here for reasons that are obvious.
NYI: N/A
NYR: a triple miss of Grabner, Fast and Raanta here. Now, Raanta's career path would have been a different one with Fleury in the way, but Grabner and Fast would have been godlike fits in Vegas.
OTT: Methot was likely the BPA, and even if you preferred Wideman over him, they managed to convert him into a second, so little to no loss there.
PHI: Bellemare did contribute to a decent PK unit, if I am not mistaken. Again, a case of there being so little difference between the players that it is hardly justifiable to question Vegas' results too much.
PIT: N/A
SJ: Another case like Pateryn/Connauton/Ouellet. Dillon is a good one, but how much better off are the Knights with him there?
STL: not questioning this one at all.
TBL: N/A
TOR: Leipsic was probably their best bet at getting anything more than replacement level impact out of Toronto.
VAN: They could have picked anyone making ELC money and been better off than with Luca Sbisa in the fold.
WSH: a murder of a pick from Vegas.
WPG: N/A

So, by my count, there were no more than five teams from which the Knights could have clearly gotten more than they did (NYR/COL/MTL, also VAN), and a handful of close calls. Overall, they did a terrific job even in hindsight.
 

King'sPawn

Enjoy the chaos
Jul 1, 2003
21,900
20,840
Dustin Brown had a resurgence last year. Though he hasn't played this year due to a broken finger.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad