Top 10 in Scoring & Selke Voting

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,144
14,456
Top ten in scoring & Selke voting (in the same season)
** Updated through 2023

PlayerSeasonScoringSelke
Adam Oates
1993​
3​
10​
Aleksander Barkov
2019​
10​
5​
Anze Kopitar
2018​
7​
1​
Auston Matthews
2022​
6​
10​
Bobby Clarke
1978​
8​
2​
Brad Marchand
2020​
6​
9​
Brad Marchand
2021​
3​
9​
Brent Sutter
1985​
10​
8​
Bryan Trottier
1981​
10​
8​
Bryan Trottier
1984​
8​
2​
Daniel Alfredsson
2006​
4​
4​
Daniel Alfredsson
2008​
9​
10​
Doug Gilmour
1987​
5​
6​
Doug Gilmour
1993​
7​
1​
Doug Gilmour
1994​
4​
2​
Elias Pettersson
2023​
10​
7​
Henrik Zetterberg
2008​
6​
3​
Jari Kurri
1983​
9​
2​
Jari Kurri
1984​
7​
3​
Jari Kurri
1985​
2​
4​
Jari Kurri
1986​
4​
5​
Jari Kurri
1987​
2​
10​
Jari Kurri
1989​
8​
10​
Jeremy Roenick
1992​
7​
9​
Joe Pavelski
2014​
8​
8​
Joe Sakic
2000​
8​
10​
Joe Sakic
2001​
2​
2​
Joe Sakic
2002​
5​
9​
Joe Thornton
2016​
4​
5​
Mark Messier
1992​
5​
9​
Martin St. Louis
2004​
1​
4​
Michel Goulet
1984​
3​
8​
Mike Modano
2002​
9​
6​
Mike Modano
2003​
10​
6​
Mitch Marner
2021​
4​
10​
Nicklas Backstrom
2010​
4​
10​
Nicklas Backstrom
2017​
4​
7​
Patrik Elias
2001​
3​
8​
Pavel Datsyuk
2008​
4​
1​
Pavel Datsyuk
2009​
4​
1​
Pavel Datsyuk
2013​
10​
3​
Peter Forsberg
1998​
2​
6​
Peter Forsberg
1999​
4​
8​
Peter Forsberg
2003​
1​
4​
Rick Middleton
1984​
10​
4​
Ron Francis
1995​
5​
1​
Ron Francis
1996​
4​
2​
Ron Francis
1997​
8​
8​
Ron Francis
1998​
5​
4​
Ryan Getzlaf
2014​
2​
10​
Sergei Fedorov
1994​
2​
1​
Sergei Fedorov
1996​
9​
1​
Sidney Crosby
2016​
3​
7​
Sidney Crosby
2017​
2​
10​
Sidney Crosby
2018​
10​
9​
Sidney Crosby
2019​
5​
4​
Steve Yzerman
2000​
10​
1​
Zack Parise
2009​
5​
8​

Disclaimers
  • This list combines an objective statistic with subjective voting; it's up to you to decide if the results are meaningful.
  • I'm fairly sure this list is complete but please let me know if I'm missing anybody.
  • Selke voting started in 1978 so I'm obviously missing useful information for players who had most or all of their career prior to that season (Clarke, Mikita, Nighbor, H. Richard, Keon, etc).
  • There have been obvious biases and patterns in Selke voting over the years; sometimes the voters seem to favour the best purely defensive forwards, and other years they vote for a complete star forward. It's tough to say if the results in different years are comparable.
Analysis
  • Kurri leads the way with an incredible six seasons. Understandably, he was overshadowed by Gretzky. I think a lot of modern fans have forgotten that Kurri was a highly intelligent, disciplined positional defensive forward. Although I don't think Kurri could have scored 130 points without Gretzky, he still proved he was a consistent elite scorer without TGO (but that's a topic for another thread).
  • Francis is next, with four seasons. Although I think he's overrated by casual fans (who incorrectly assume that he was a dominant scorer due to the fact that he played a long time in hockey's second-highest scoring era), maybe we're underrating him on this forum. His defensive play is, if anything, underrated. (Updated for 2019 - Sidney Crosby has now tied him).
  • Datsyuk, Forsberg, Gilmour and Sakic each have three appearances on this list; Alfredsson, Backstrom, Fedorov, Marchard, Modano and Trottier each have two.
  • I was surprised to see Goulet earn a spot on this list. I know he's above-average defensively but I didn't realize there was at least one season when he was deemed Selke-worthy.
  • Brent Sutter is likely the worst player on this list -- it's amazing what playing one year with Mike Bossy can do for your stats.
  • No player has ever won the Art Ross & Selke in the same season. Fedorov came closest (winning the Selke in 1994 while finishing 2nd in scoring to Gretzky). Sakic was runner-up for both awards in 2001.
  • One would expect that players who are great offensively & defensively would fare well in Hart trophy voting, but that's not always the case. There are only six Hart-winning seasons on this list (Messier in 1992, Fedorov in 1994, Sakic in 2001, Forsberg in 2003, St. Louis in 2004 and Matthews in 2022), and only eight more seasons where the player finished top three in Hart voting (Gilmour 2nd in 1993; Trottier 3rd in 1984; Datsyuk 3rd in 2009; Getzlaf 2nd in 2014; Crosby 2nd in 2016, 2017 and 2019; Kopitar 3rd in 2018). Kurri and Francis, the players with the most spots on this list, never placed higher than 14th in Hart voting during their seasons listed above (largely because they were overshadowed by some all-time greats).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jigglysquishy

nik jr

Registered User
Sep 25, 2005
10,798
7
clarke only had 1 season in the top 10 after the creation of the selke ('78). based on some games i've seen and his reputation, he probably would have won several if the award had existed for his entire career.
 
Last edited:

nik jr

Registered User
Sep 25, 2005
10,798
7
HO, are you sure about clarke in '78? the award and all star thread says clarke was 4th in selke, behind gainey, ramsay and marcotte.
 

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,144
14,456
HO, are you sure about clarke in '78? the award and all star thread says clarke was 4th in selke, behind gainey, ramsay and marcotte.

Corrected, thanks!

I really, really, really hope this list ends up giving me some statistical back up to ranking Bobby Clarke ahead of Mikita, Trottier, Esposito, and Schmidt.

I think one could argue that Clarke would have been at least a Selke finalist each year from 1974 to 1977... unfortunately the NHL didn't create the award until 1978. I think he was the best defensive player of the five you listed, and won the most Hart trophies, but he's arguably the weakest offensively. We'll see how this argument unfolds in the new Top 100 voting.
 
Last edited:

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,981
Brooklyn
I have tons of respect for Sakic, but seeing him appear three times on this list is a bit baffling. He just wasn't a top 10 defensive player in the NHL for 3 different seasons IMO.

His 2nd place finish in 2001 was based purely on statistics. That was the year he finished tied for first in +/-, in addition to finishing second in the league in scoring.

+/- had a huge effect on Selke voting in the late 90s/early 00s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dingo

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,144
14,456
His 2nd place finish in 2001 was based purely on statistics. That was the year he finished tied for first in +/-, in addition to finishing second in the league in scoring.

+/- had a huge effect on Selke voting in the late 90s/early 00s.

I don't think Forsberg deserved such a high finish in Selke voting (4th place) in 2003. Clearly he was a great defensive player but he wasn't really used in a defensive role that year (averaging about 12 seconds of PK ice time per game). I think a lot of people were influenced by his reputation and statistics (+52, first in the league) without considering that he simply wasn't used in a defensive role that year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yozhik v tumane

Padan

Registered User
Aug 16, 2006
534
2
Wow, this really shows how overrated Forsberg was defensively. Below-average in the face-off circle, rarely played on the penalty-kill (due to injuries though), always matched up against the oppositions checking lines, but was still considered one of the leagues top defensive forwards. :shakehead
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,981
Brooklyn
I don't think Forsberg deserved such a high finish in Selke voting (4th place) in 2003. Clearly he was a great defensive player but he wasn't really used in a defensive role that year (averaging about 12 seconds of PK ice time per game). I think a lot of people were influenced by his reputation and statistics (+52, first in the league) without considering that he simply wasn't used in a defensive role that year.

I give almost no credit to the Selke voting in the late 90s/early 00s. Voters really did just look at statistics, and shallow ones at that - unadjusted +/- first of all, and points secondly. Add some bonus points for "reputation."

By contrast, Datsyuk's 2008 win was based in large part on statistics - but voters looked more deeply by using stats like takeways, rather than just using +/- as a proxy for "defensive play."
 

nik jr

Registered User
Sep 25, 2005
10,798
7
i completely agree that selke voting was heavily influenced by +/-.

I think one could argue that Clarke would have been at least a Selke finalist each year from 1974 to 1977... unfortunately the NHL didn't create the award until 1978. I think he was the best defensive player of the five you listed, and won the most Hart trophies, but he's arguably the weakest offensively. We'll see how this argument unfolds in the new Top 100 voting.

here are a couple of things posted during the top 100 debate.

A few years I found the results of a 1976 NHL coaches poll from the Toronto Star which I printed here http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=190951

The poll asked head coaches to rate the best players in various categories. Just to give an idea of how highly regarded Clarke was:
Best Penalty Killer: Bobby Clarke
Best Checker: Bobby Clarke
Best on Faceoffs: Bobby Clarke
Hardest Worker: Bobby Clarke
Best Playmaker: Bobby Clarke
Most Valuable Player: Bobby Clarke
First Player You`d Choose Starting a Team From Scratch: Bobby Clarke


I can't think of any other forward I've ever seen who's complete game was that far reaching.

clarke's ESGA during his prime were incredible, even when parent was injured in '76. he was on the ice for only about 20 ESGA in a couple of seasons.

A Case for Bobby Clarke

I’m a fan of the +/- stat. I think it can be very powerful if used correctly. If you take a look at the +/- numbers, I think Bobby Clarke looks very good.

Unlike goals scored or points scored, the +/- stat measures what is truly important in hockey – scoring more goals than your opponent. It can be used for forwards or defencemen, and it measures both a players ability to boost his teams offence or defence.

It’s certainly true that there are problems with the +/- stat. It can break down at the micro level sometimes, as +/- isn’t the stat to look at in individual games. However, over many games, the random factors tend to even out. The best players will be plus players, and the weaker players will be minus players. These factors don’t necessarily even out over a full season, which is why I like to look at multiple seasons of data. It is true that playing with stronger teammates will help a player here, but we can use our judgement to try and determine how much it helped. Playing against stronger opposition can be a factor, but I'm pretty confident that all of the players on this list consistently faced the oppositions best players, except for Messier in Edmonton.

Here are the numbers for the 5 players eligible who played since 1968, when these numbers were first tracked. I only have the raw data for +/-, which means that these aren’t exact numbers for even strength goals, they include SH goals against and for. Also, the $Pts number is a number I calculated that adds the players ESGF and ESGA to a league-average team for the season and estimates how many regular season points it would add to the team.

YEAR| PLAYER| ESGF|ESGA| $Pts
1968| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 76| 57| 7
1969| ESPOSITO, PHIL|114| 58| 19
1970| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 77| 49| 11
1971| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 136| 65| 21
1972| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 115| 60| 18
1973| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 107| 91| 5
1974| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 136| 85| 14
1975| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 95| 77| 5
1976| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 61| 101| -12
1977| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 71| 99| -9
1978| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 61| 83| -7
1979| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 78| 79| -0
1980| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 76| 89| -4
1981| ESPOSITO, PHIL| 34| 47| -4

YEAR| PLAYER| ESGF| ESGA| $Pts
1970| CLARKE, BOBBY| 45| 44| 0
1971| CLARKE, BOBBY| 58| 49| 3
1972| CLARKE, BOBBY| 73| 51| 8
1973| CLARKE, BOBBY| 91| 59| 10
1974| CLARKE, BOBBY| 71| 36| 12
1975| CLARKE, BOBBY| 98| 19| 25
1976| CLARKE, BOBBY| 105| 22| 26
1977| CLARKE, BOBBY| 85| 46| 13
1978| CLARKE, BOBBY| 80| 33| 16
1979| CLARKE, BOBBY| 65| 53| 4
1980| CLARKE, BOBBY| 86| 44| 13
1981| CLARKE, BOBBY| 62| 45| 5
1982| CLARKE, BOBBY| 68| 40| 8
1983| CLARKE, BOBBY| 83| 46| 11
1984| CLARKE, BOBBY| 65| 42| 7

YEAR| PLAYER| ESGF |ESGA |$Pts
1974| POTVIN, DENIS| 85 |101 |-5
1975| POTVIN, DENIS| 105 |77 |8
1976| POTVIN, DENIS| 83 |71 |4
1977| POTVIN, DENIS |117 |75 |12
1978| POTVIN, DENIS |134 |77 |16
1979| POTVIN, DENIS |128 |57 |20
1980| POTVIN, DENIS |46 |33 |5
1981| POTVIN, DENIS |105 |67 |10
1982| POTVIN, DENIS |92 |54 |11
1983| POTVIN, DENIS |85 |53 |9
1984| POTVIN, DENIS |128 |73 |14
1985| POTVIN, DENIS |116 |80 |9
1986| POTVIN, DENIS |94 |60 |9
1987| POTVIN, DENIS |49 |55 |-2
1988| POTVIN, DENIS |75 |49 |8

YEAR| PLAYER| ESGF| ESGA| $Pts
1978| BOSSY, MIKE |73 |42 |11
1979| BOSSY, MIKE |104 |41 |19
1980| BOSSY, MIKE |79 |51 |9
1981| BOSSY, MIKE |97 |60 |10
1982| BOSSY, MIKE |120 |51 |18
1983| BOSSY, MIKE |93 |66 |8
1984| BOSSY, MIKE |112 |46 |18
1985| BOSSY, MIKE |102 |65 |10
1986| BOSSY, MIKE |105 |75 |8
1987 |BOSSY, MIKE |52 |59 |-2

YEAR |PLAYER |ESGF |ESGA |$Pts
1980| MESSIER, MARK |44 |54 |-3
1981| MESSIER, MARK |65 |77 |-3
1982 |MESSIER, MARK |103 |82 |5
1983| MESSIER, MARK |103 |84 |5
1984 |MESSIER, MARK |100 |60 |11
1985 |MESSIER, MARK |54 |46 |2
1986 |MESSIER, MARK |83 |47 |10
1987 |MESSIER, MARK |91 |70 |6
1988 |MESSIER, MARK |95 |74 |6
1989 |MESSIER, MARK |71 |76 |-1
1990 |MESSIER, MARK |99 |80 |5
1991 |MESSIER, MARK |56 |41 |5
1992 |MESSIER, MARK |102 |71 |9
1993 |MESSIER, MARK |74 |80 |-2
1994 |MESSIER, MARK |71 |46 |9
1995 |MESSIER, MARK |41 |33 |3
1996 |MESSIER, MARK |81 |52 |10
1997 |MESSIER, MARK |75 |63 |4
1998 |MESSIER, MARK |64 |74 |-4
1999 |MESSIER, MARK| 35 |47 |-5
2000 |MESSIER, MARK |41 |56 |-6
2001 |MESSIER, MARK |51 |76 |-9
2002 |MESSIER, MARK |22 |23 |0
2003 |MESSIER, MARK |41 |43 |-1
2004 |MESSIER, MARK |48 |45 |1

First, while team strength is an issue in +/- stats, I don’t think that’s a big issue here. All of these 5 players played on teams that were multiple Cup winners and consistent contenders. Orr may have inflated Esposito’s stats a bit, Bossy obviously gets the Trottier effect. Clarke had Leach and Barber during his best years, but they aren’t all-time greats and their +/- numbers were unimpressive when they didn’t play with Clarke, while Clarke’s numbers were consistently good to great over his career. I don’t think Potvin or Messier had any teammates inflating their numbers, beyond the general effect of playing on great teams.

By the $Pts metric, let’s look at how the players rank over different time periods.

Best 3 |Best 5 |Best 7 |Best 10 |Career
Clarke |Clarke |Clarke |Clarke |Clarke
Esposito |Esposito |Esposito |Potvin |Potvin
Potvin |Bossy |Bossy |Bossy |Bossy
Bossy |Potvin |Potvin |Esposito |Esposito
Messier |Messier |Messier |Messier |Messier

Clarke is far and away the class of this group by +/- analysis, in peak, career, or any combination. Similarly, Messier is relatively unimpressive - although of course his case at this point depends almost entirely on his playoff record. Potvin and Bossy both look good, although I'd take Potvin ahead of Bossy as Bossy got to play with Trottier all the time. Esposito has the great peak, and his career can't be fairly evaluated by this as the numbers only go back to 1968.

Of course this is only a piece of the puzzle, and observation and analysis by knowledgeable observers can go a long way. This analysis also doesn't cover playoffs, although it can possibly help there also - I think it's reasonable to assume that Clarke was similarly defensively dominant in the 75 and 76 playoffs. However, I think that the +/- data we have on the post-1968 players is a valuable tool and should be given more weight, especially compared to simply looking at scoring numbers.

I'm voting for Clarke and will place him at the top of my list. His regular season numbers, playoff performance, and reputation all add up for me. Right now the rest of my list would go Kelly, Hall, Potvin, Esposito, with Roy and Lindsay still in the running.
 

BrutalWolf

Registered User
Mar 26, 2007
92
0
There are a lot of players who have won the Selke trophy and haven't been the best defensive forward in the league, or even on the team.

But to back up Sakic, who received more 1st place votes in 2000-01, he was an elite defensive forward from the mid 90s to just before the lockout. He played a ton of minutes on the PP and on even strength, so he may not have played as much minutes shorthanded as one would expect from a good defensive player. Forsberg was never really that great defensively, though he was above average.
 

TheDevilMadeMe

Registered User
Aug 28, 2006
52,271
6,981
Brooklyn
There are a lot of players who have won the Selke trophy and haven't been the best defensive forward in the league, or even on the team.

But to back up Sakic, who received more 1st place votes in 2000-01, he was an elite defensive forward from the mid 90s to just before the lockout. He played a ton of minutes on the PP and on even strength, so he may not have played as much minutes shorthanded as one would expect from a good defensive player. Forsberg was never really that great defensively, though he was above average.

I agree that Sakic was a very good two-way player. (just not Selke worthy). In fact, he usually was the guy who went against the top lines of other teams (I saw a post here a year or so back proving this). Forsberg's two-way play got overrated because a lot of people assumed that physical play and defense were the same things.
 

Dark Shadows

Registered User
Jun 19, 2007
7,986
15
Canada
www.robotnik.com
I agree that Sakic was a very good two-way player. (just not Selke worthy). In fact, he usually was the guy who went against the top lines of other teams (I saw a post here a year or so back proving this). Forsberg's two-way play got overrated because a lot of people assumed that physical play and defense were the same things.

Forsberg's two way play was actually, very good. Not only that, but it was exceptionally difficult to score while he was on the ice by virtue of his keeping the play in the offensive Zone. Just look at his goals for and goals against.

I of course agree that Sakic's two way game was very underrated as well. Sakic's first 3 years were not pretty, but after that, its great two way numbers.

Yzerman's goals for/goals against numbers take a gigantic swing for the better at 1994, obviously because of the arrival of Bowman's system and Yzerman's dedication to becoming a better two way player.
 

Dennis Bonvie

Registered User
Dec 29, 2007
29,425
17,842
Connecticut
I really, really, really hope this list ends up giving me some statistical back up to ranking Bobby Clarke ahead of Mikita, Trottier, Esposito, and Schmidt.

I have Clarke ahead of all those guys on my list, too. (Unless you mean PHIL Esposito)


From the top post:

"- Francis is next, with four seasons. Although I think he's overrated by casual fans (who incorrectly assume that he was a dominant scorer due to the fact that he played a long time in hockey's second-highest scoring era), maybe we're underrating him on this forum. His defensive play is, if anything, underrated."

Nice to see. I agree.
 

MXD

Original #4
Oct 27, 2005
50,798
16,540
HO... If we take in consideration Retro Selkes, which guys would be added? I expect to see lots of Mikita, some Keon, a few Provost...
Retro-Selke data doesn't appear anymore with the search function (?) so I wonder if some guys would be added to the list. Obviously, Retro Selkes were not voted (so there were no Selke's 2nd place...) so we would only have "winners" with "Top-10 points"...

What I know
- Nighbor has six Top-10 in points : the first 4 NHL years + 23-24;25-26.
- I though Berlinquette had one, but he didn't.
- Lepine has no Top-10 in points
- Finnigan has two Top-10 (9,10) in 27-28;28-29
- Hooley Smith has six Top-10 (4,4,6,8,8,10) in 25-26;28-29;31-32;32-33;33-34;35-36.
- Charley McVeigh has no Top-10 in points.
- Neither does Murray Murdoch
- Neither does Bob Davidson
- Neither does Marty Pavelich
- Can't really look, but I'm sure Marcotte has none.

Those are the guys I can think with a R-Selke, aside from the usual suspects (Keon, Provost, Mikita...)

If somebody can retrieve the data for R-Selke, and complete it with Top-10 in points, it would make a nice addition.
 
Last edited:

MXD

Original #4
Oct 27, 2005
50,798
16,540
Ullman? Or Delvecchio wouldnt be bad choices either

I named guys that I remembered "earning" R-Selkes. If Delvechio and Ullman earned such of them, they'll likely join the list. For whatever reason, the only winners that I remembered were the obvious suspects and the 1917-1936 guys.
 

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,144
14,456
If somebody can retrieve the data for R-Selke, and complete it with Top-10 in points, it would make a nice addition.

Retro Selke & scoring rank
- Frank Nighbor (1920): 2nd
- Frank Nighbor (1921): 3rd
- Frank Nighbor (1926): 8th
- Frank Boucher (1929): 6th
- Neil Colville (1941): 7th
- Claude Provost (1965): 6th
- Stan Mikita (1968): 1st (**wins Art Ross and wins retro Selke)
- Bobby Clarke (1974): 5th
- Bobby Clarke (1975): 6th

Obviously there is no voting data available for the retro Selkes. Many players, both on and off this list, had several seasons that would qualify for my list in the first post.
 

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,144
14,456
Two additions to this list (2009):

- Datsyuk, for the second consecutive season, finished 4th in scoring and won the Selke trophy
- Parise finished 5th in scoring and 8th in Selke voting
 
Last edited:

NOTENOUGHJTCGOALS

Registered User
Feb 28, 2006
13,542
5,771
Am I the only one that doesnt like Datsyuk's Selke trophies? He's hardly a terrible defensive player but watching him play I think his winning is just as bad as Sakic finishing runner up.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad