plank
Registered User
He visited me and told me to say that on HF Boards.
Glad to see a sense of humour, between that post and the Q is trying to keep Kane down line, I was questioning you sanity.
He visited me and told me to say that on HF Boards.
It seems to be the common sense opinion that Patrick Kane is worth more than Jonathan Toews. This is completely false. Jonathan Toews is a +127, penalty killing, faceoff winning center.
Anyone who would rather have Kane than Toews is not serious.
If given the choice between Ovechkin or Crosby, I'd pick Toews, Perry or Datsuk.
Not worried about resigning Kane or Toews. They will get the same. Kane is just doing Toews a favor and driving up the ticket price. Kane will get what he deserves while Toews might get more than he deserves.
The guy I'm worried about is Saad. I think he likes Chicago but that guy is going to get paid!
Yes, in 2010, the Sharks made us choose between Niemi and Hjalmarsson. I fear that the Hawks may face a similar choice between Saad and Leddy.
I doubt it. They have pieces they can move for relief. Someone like Oduya would be really easy to pawn off.
Hope so. But if I had to choose I would keep Saad. As it stands.
I doubt it. They have pieces they can move for relief. Someone like Oduya would be really easy to pawn off.
It seems to be the common sense opinion that Patrick Kane is worth more than Jonathan Toews. This is completely false. Jonathan Toews is a +127, penalty killing, faceoff winning center.
Anyone who would rather have Kane than Toews is not serious.
If given the choice between Ovechkin or Crosby, I'd pick Toews, Perry or Datsuk.
Hope so. But if I had to choose I would keep Saad. As it stands.
I understand your feelings, but there's no way. They Hawks are almost certainly not bringing back Oduya or Roszival. And Keith and Seabrook aren't getting any younger. Saad might be a better player, but he's more expendable than Leddy. I feel sure that Stan Bowman would choose Leddy over Saad if it came down to that.
1. Crosby
2. Datsyuk in his prime
3. Ovechkin
4. Toews
5. Perry
Patrick Kane is capable of being better than Toews and he is much better this year. Overall, I would draft Toews ahead of Kane that's me personally. Patrick Kane making more money than Toews has a good chance of happening. Comparing their games is just ridiculous they are completely different. Measuring who I would pay more I think Kane deserves 500,000 more a season than Toews.
Without Toews and Hossa, I think Kane would be just another Edmonton Oilers type punk.
I'm not sure. Saad has shown much faster progression than Leddy has in much less time. Hossa isn't getting any younger, and Saad is basically a proto-Hossa waiting in the wings to take that spot when Hossa finally calls it a career (which, don't fool yourself, is going to happen before his contract is up, probably courtesy of LTIR).
Leddy is still problematic under a forecheck. He has tremendous offensive upside but is still, STILL being sheltered as far as zone starts and match-ups. We're not going to re-up a guy that can't move past the 5th defensemen slot for a ton of money. At least I hope not.
Perry would in no way be 4th either.
Keith has at least 5 great seasons ahead of him the way he plays. Seabrook should be good for at least 4. The window is wide open.
Assuming they were all in the same 18 y.o. draft class and that I have my current perspective on their careers, I would choose them in the following order...
1. Toews
2. Datsyuk
3. Crosby
4. Perry
5. Stamkos
6. Hossa
I don't want ANYTHING to do with Ovechkin, who makes too much money, doesn't backcheck or penalty kill, and is simply all flash and no substance. I don't think a team in the salary cap era can win with Alex Ovechkin on it.
I think Mike Babcock perfectly defined Jonathan Toews' existence during the 2010 Olympics when he said his best player was anyone who he put on the Toews line. Toews makes everyone around him better. And I don't mean that in some esoteric leadership sense. He wins faceoffs, back checks, goes to dirty areas, wins board battles, and it's simply impossible to see that game-in-game-out, see how it pays off and not imitate it. Jonathan Toews is Death To Hockey Punks.
Without Toews and Hossa, I think Kane would be just another Edmonton Oilers type punk.
When you look at the Anaheim roster, how do you explain the fact that they are 57-19-11 in the last two years (125 pts in 87 games)? They also have the remarkable distinction of being 4-0-0 against the Blackhawks over that time.
Corey Perry is an absolute beast. I have nightmares about that guy. I am tempted to put him first on this list. I would much sooner move him up than down. He simply takes over hockey games.
Giant ????? to everything in this post.
Every year I make the same prediction, and every year I'm right:
This season, Patrick Kane will score more points than Jonathan Toews, but Jonathan Toews will be more important to the team's success.
Giant ????? to everything in this post.
I completely disagree. He doesn't even belong in the top 5.