WheresRamziAbid
Registered User
- Oct 31, 2013
- 7,240
- 2,093
barf
Pouliot would either be the perfect fit or a complete train wreck. There would be no in between with that guy.
Such a talented player with all the tools you could ask for in terms of vision, shot, skating, size, etc.
But he's odd in that Kessel type way, where you have no idea if the guy is purposely dogging it or if he's just one of those guys that truly believes he's trying his best and has nothing more to give.
The "good" version of Pouliot would be a point per game player and a perfect compliment to either 87 or 71. He'd make THEM better and vice versa. He's that talented.
The "bad" version of Pouliot would be absolutely devastating.
Ew.
What about the Plotnikov part?
Pouliot would either be the perfect fit or a complete train wreck. There would be no in between with that guy.
Such a talented player with all the tools you could ask for in terms of vision, shot, skating, size, etc.
But he's odd in that Kessel type way, where you have no idea if the guy is purposely dogging it sometimes or if he's just one of those guys that truly believes he's trying his best when he's doing poorly and has nothing more to give.
The "good" version of Pouliot would be a point per game player and a perfect compliment to either 87 or 71. He'd make THEM better and vice versa. He's that talented and that dangerous.
The "bad" version of Pouliot would be absolutely devastating.
His agent requested a trade, and they've been trying to trade him for awhile.
That is the opposite of what IC says, however.
that wouldn't surprise me with how he's been handled/treated
does TIOPS literally have any sources though? I just see people **** on him constantly
He's about as reliable as Eklund, but he may have gotten even less right in his life than Eklund has.
I actually suspect that Dallas will focus on Demers and let Gogo walk, solely as Demers will cost less then Gogo (I figure 4-4.5m vs 5.5-6m).
But if he makes it to FA, he would be at the top of my list - and well before getting a better LW.
That time of the year when fake rumors come out for click bait. I would not be surprised if Plots really DID want out though, and i'll be surprised if we even have another player from Europe wanting to sign with Pens any time soon.
I would imagine that, were the Penguins looking to make a move, that you'd probably have to think, "where is their surplus?" And "what do they need?"
So, number two, first: a top-6 LW and a top-4 D.
If they get a top-4d, let's pretend it's Hamhuis, he would likely slot in with Letang. Now, let's just say they won't move Maatta or Dumoulin.
We now know their surplus. Daley or Cole, maybe Lovejoy, but probably not.
Now, if that top-4D is younger and better, the surplus is Daley or Cole or maybe one of Dumoulin and Maatta, but gosh, that would have to be a really spectacular dman they're getting.
For LW, their surplus is still Cole and Daley, and honestly, one of them likely has to go for salary purposes.
Then you think Kunitz or Bonino or Bennett would be available, with their value being listed in that order. Hypothetically.
Now, you might wonder, "do Daley and Cole and Kunitz have value?!?"
Top-4D are always in demand. Cole is not one but Daley may be. He's certainly helping his case right now.
Now, again, let's just pretend. Let's say there are 5 top-4D on the market. Not just top-4D, but "oh wow, really?" Plus Hamhuis. Now you might think this hurts Daley's value, but Daley wouldn't be going for futures, it would be a hockey trade, and Daley wouldn't command as much in return. So that might make him more attractive. Plus, his contract, if he plays like he has for the Pens, is really nice. 3.3, not 4.4 like some mistakenly suggest).
Plotnikov may be an add on to one of those deals, but nothing close to the centrepiece. Maybe they snag a 5th for him at the deadline. Who knows. No one knows. Everything is awesome.
With Daley playing well, why not just keep Daley? Do that, and you still have Kunitz, Cole and Lovejoy to dangle.
If you move Daley you NEED another good skating top 4 guy coming back in return, whereas if you move any of the other 3, you have more options.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think Daley's long term future is here, but that's a huge blow to the blueline if we move him for a winger with nothing coming back.