Preddownsouth
Registered User
- Feb 20, 2013
- 273
- 0
Sorry can't take an article seriously when the writer not only gets a contract wrong, his math on the deal he does publish is wrong as well. Sigh.
Ok forgive me if I'm way off base here but you come across as a guy with a good bit of broad hockey knowledge who drew the short straw and was stuck blogging about the Preds because, well, hey somebody's got to... and while all of your statistical analysis may be correct, all of us who have lived and died with this team for years know that the Preds sonehow always end up being better than the sum of their individual parts. Now don't get me wrong, I wish poile had landed a true top 6 winger... but my point is don't be surprised if at the end if the year you look back and realize that many of your generalizations were pretty accurate and yet somehow the Preds outperformed expectations and you say, "damn, how did that happen?"
From a technical standpoint, this will be the worst article I will ever write. I got caught between a more rigid, news-y format and a good old fashioned ramble, and that accounts for most of the stylistic mediocrity (or worse, I'm looking at you, "without further ado"). The typos and such are inexcusable as well.
As for the central holding of the article, I completely disagree that I "don't understand Trotz system" or what the Predators sought to do in free agency. They spent market value or greater on four guys who top out as third liners, all of whom played in sheltered roles last season. The biggest thing those players bring to the table right now is that they're legitimate NHL bodies in lineup spots where waiver wire claims and future considerations were playing in 12-13. That's great, but if filling out the lineup is your #1 goal, why pay the premium Nashville did? They could've waited for the market to shake out a bit and gotten someone like Mason Raymond (with an eerily similar skillset and splits to Stalberg and more defensive value) on the cheap, rather than pay Stalberg 12 mil because he was one of the three least important forwards on a Cup team.
Assuming that most UFAs would sign for comparable money/term in Nashville, I would have given Stalberg and Cullen's money to Filppula, who is basically a younger, strictly better Cullen. From there, I would have given say, $4/2 to Raymond ($7 million in cap spent so far) and then signed say Chad Larose or Chuck Kobasew to a cheap deal (5-800k) as veteran depth on the fourth line. If locker room chemistry was such an issue, I'd be in on that Parros trade as well, especially because he wouldn't be the first enforcer to revitalize himself in the Music City. I could also sign one of Hendricks/Nystrom (I much prefer Hendricks) to round out the group, and still spend less than Poile did on the day.
Filppula (25/5)
Raymond (4/2)
Vet (800k/1)
Hendricks (7.4/4)
Parros (937k/1)
~10.6 in cap space
That package has the best player (Flip) while checking all the same boxes Nashville's actual UFA shopping list did, for cheaper.
And I agree with the OP in his last post. We should've gotten more bang for the buck and didn't and now we're strapped with some contracts we will not be able to get rid of.
We ***** and moan about scoring issues yet as a fan base are content with spending $8 million on a fourth line? I would rather have spent that money on 2 players than 4 players that are not game changers. We're also pushing a home grown talent out the door for wanting more money than some feel he's worth but giving it to guys who aren't better players than he is. The fourth line salary as a total should not be above $4 million, period yet here we are, still lacking top line talent and about to ice a fourth line that is eating up 1/8 of our payroll.
Yes we needed grit and toughness but we could've done it without breaking the bank and still had money to spend on top 6 talent. Unless the young kids like Wilson, Bourque, Beck and Forsberg all turn in to studs this year, we're still going to have issues and while I like they're collective futures, I think Poile spent his money in an unwise fashion.
And if you're going to overpay for players, do it for talented ones, not 4th line grinders.
Filppula (25/5)
Raymond (4/2)
Vet (800k/1)
Hendricks (7.4/4)
Parros (937k/1)
~10.6 in cap space
That package has the best player (Flip) while checking all the same boxes Nashville's actual UFA shopping list did, for cheaper.
You do seem to switch back and forth between wanting to stick with some AP style journalism and the tendencies of opinion-blog writers. I'm interested to see where you go from here forward. Overall, it's not a bad article once edited for typos. You cover our FA deals well and I think it aptly points out the typical confusing or disappointing choices made by Poile.
Alas, it's hard for someone who hasn't followed the Preds very long to have blind faith that somehow, mysteriously, Poile & Trotz will actually pull this ***** off. Sometimes we forget, ourselves. We will spend the season going all Chicken Little all over this board and then, of course, at the last minute the Preds pick it up and we'll hit the playoffs. After months of us posting about what's wrong with the Trotz system we'll change our tune and we'll be buying our post-season tickets full of self-assured words that we always knew deep down inside that the Preds would get to the post season ...and this year is gonna be the year we win the cup. Then we'll blow it. We'll buy some Preds shirts on discount, complain about trade deadline moves, and say maybe someone should get fired. After the summer we'll start all over again.
Anyway, I forgot where I was going here, but I'd say take it easy on our new writer. Sometimes seeing is believing and perhaps he has yet to witness the mysterious Predators ways. Welcome aboard Struckbyaparkedcar.
Yeah, Filppula the amazing $5m center has scored more than 40 points once in 7 NHL seasons.
Yet Cullen at $3m is a flop, he's only done it 6 times.
Cullen also out produced Filpula last season.
Again, one is a sexy pick, the other, not so much so he must be a flop.
That's why these kind of posts infuriate me. Some guy draws the short straw and has to write about the Preds. Does some cursory research and quickly concludes all of these guys who haven't seen a minute of ice time in a Preds sweater are already flops.
Guys like this and Lozo who seem to know so much about this stuff should give David Poile a call and see if he could use some 'expert' help.
Look these guys may turn out to be bad additions. Or maybe they will gel and put out a team that dominates defensively while getting some good offense from Cullen/Stalberg/etc. The point is we don't know yet. Neither does the author of this article. Labeling them flops, winners, whatever is worthless right now.
I agree. Another article that fails to take in the reality of "it's hard to get people to want to come here", "why did the Preds overspend", etc.....
blech.
I think that's BS now, with the way the Conferences are now pretty much all teams are within the same or 2 time zones, but that's jmho
Let's see, a train ride from Philly to NYC or a ride in a plane from here to Vancouver? Just my opinion...
I found the overall quality of the article to be below average, as with most of the articles I've read on that site.