- Jun 24, 2012
- 84,017
- 151,608
Let's see
big = gros
works = travaux
Gros travaux .... well duh, this is Montreal, it's always gros travaux when it's not winter
MT is gonna announce he's gonna run for Mayor ?
Let's see
big = gros
works = travaux
Gros travaux .... well duh, this is Montreal, it's always gros travaux when it's not winter
MT is gonna announce he's gonna run for Mayor ?
Ticket Prices are set by demand in the market, not the player's salaries.
Actually, in a competitive market, prices are equal to marginal cost (assume a basic model with no externalities), or the derivative of the cost function. Thus variable costs (salaries) absolutely play a role in determining price.
And what is the Habs competition when it comes to selling tickets for a hockey game in Montreal?
Agreed. It seems like his "prediction" was just an arbitrary guess to go against the grain and has no statistical data to indicate he might be right.There is a legal definition of recession... it is two straight quarters with negative growth. So yes, we have seen many recessions. If you want to argue the politics of how the government has handled those and whether it was right or wrong, go to the politics board.
That doesn't change the fact that while other industries experienced the recession, and negative growth, hockey and other sports were not effected greatly. Not during the oil crisis, not in the early 90s, not at the turn of the century, and not in the manufacturing/housing market crash. At none of these did sports see a dramatic downturn such as the one you are forecasting.
You can believe the cap will be under $50 million all you want, I think that belief is not founded on any sane economic projections.
If you want to say cap growth will slow? Sure I can see that, it obviously can't continue to grow at current rates indefinitely. But to say that somehow the NHL will lose close to 30% of their current revenue? and drop back to a cap level that is in 2006-07, just the second season after the cap was introduced? I just don't see such a catastrophe.
In macroeconomics terms, it's because of price elasticity of demand. In layman's terms, this means that the demand for some goods and services is relatively resistant to price increases and money supply shortages. Alcohol, tobacco, gas, and pro sports are examples. Recession or boom, price hike or not, people will buy them and sacrifice something else instead.
When the hockey season is in full swing and many hockey fans need a new pair of winter boots, a good number of them will spend money on hockey tickets instead.
Not sure if this has been mentionned yet, but could he have been talking about an outdoor game?
I'm blown away that people still think (or even originally thought) Therrien was referring to a trade.
What's the point in getting Byfuglien when we already have Tinordi on defence and Big Mac as a PWF. Brett Lernout is in the pipeline also, it may take 3-4 yrs. but the Habs have drafted the players necessary. Murray and others were used to plug those holes until our prospects could develop, their time for NHL experience is now.
I'm blown away that people still think (or even originally thought) Therrien was referring to a trade.
Actually, in a competitive market, prices are equal to marginal cost (assume a basic model with no externalities), or the derivative of the cost function. Thus variable costs (salaries) absolutely play a role in determining price.
For a monopoly though, price is determined by finding the optimal quantity wherein profit (not revenue) is maximized.
I think the Habs would be a monopolistically competitive firm, so that muddles things. My point is, that demand doesn't solely determine price.
I'm blown away that people still think (or even originally thought) Therrien was referring to a trade.
You're on hfboards. 95% of the people don't know anything basic about hockey, so you can guess how gullible they are.
I think we are all desperate for a major move up front.
We are somehow softer than last year?
Whack and hack PK and Max all year and what is our response?