Pastor Of Muppetz
Registered User
- Oct 1, 2017
- 26,184
- 16,070
You dont say..?gillis can get another job he just wants to make sure its the right one. he said so himself he declines many jobs
You dont say..?gillis can get another job he just wants to make sure its the right one. he said so himself he declines many jobs
gillis can get another job he just wants to make sure its the right one. he said so himself he declines many jobs
Ugh once again we're on this ridiculous "everyone hated Gillis and wouldn't trade with" bullcrap.
Mike Gillis won GM of the year in 2011. 24/30 GM's cast a vote for him, 14 of which gave him first place. Steve Yzerman came in 2nd with 7 first place votes.
You can't claim that the entire league hated Gillis but then voted him as the best amongst them.
I'm sure GM's have a healthy rivalry and certainly there has been animosity. But Brian Burke and Dave Nonis and the Toronto based media in general being whiners does not mean they represent the rest of the NHL.
Means dick all. He built the greatest Canucks team ever assembled. 10-12 will likely never be matched again.
He likely learned from any past mistakes and would come back stronger. Other GMs maybe dont like him because he's smarter than all of them. Look at the morons running some of these teams.
Mike Gillis won GM of the year in 2011. 24/30 GM's cast a vote for him, 14 of which gave him first place. Steve Yzerman came in 2nd with 7 first place votes.
As a consolation prize on losing the Stanley Cup Finals!? Why not! Gillis should be on his knees kissing Aquaman feet for getting him the GM Job cause he got dick everywhere else.
@Bubbles again, these guys don’t get it.
i am pretty sure that they could easily have voted him gm of the year based on his team's record and still thought he was a jerk they did not want to deal with.
As I keep saying, Gillis wants a level of control and autonomy that owners are, frankly, unwilling to concede.
As a consolation prize on losing the Stanley Cup Finals!? Why not! Gillis should be on his knees kissing Aquaman feet for getting him the GM Job cause he got dick everywhere else.
@Bubbles again, these guys don’t get it.
Sure he did but he ain’t ‘with it’ with the other OBC guys like Rutherford, Davidson, Lemieux, Lou Lam and Burke. Him coming back as a GM, if he only got the Vancouver job…he won’t get anywhere else.
As a consolation prize on losing the Stanley Cup Finals!? Why not! Gillis should be on his knees kissing Aquaman feet for getting him the GM Job cause he got dick everywhere else.
@Bubbles again, these guys don’t get it.
^ i think the distinction is really just some people think this is stupid and leaning into it produces poor results, while others are cheering it on
i don’t think anybody here doesn’t understand that the exec level in the nhl, and the world in general, is a boy’s club
People are making excuses for how he's been turned down by the Devils, Panthers and Kraken. Wasn't even considered for the Pens job because of Burkie. Clearly, either somebody or HIMSELF is stopping his re-entry into the NHL.
new parody account?
My question always is, why does he get those interviews in the first place if there's no interest at all in him and he's become completely carcinogenic to the NHL executive/owner community?
If he's not someone people want to work with and there's animosity, why would you entertain his thoughts? Thoughts that, apparently, aren't valued by the people he's sharing them with.
Using your boorish coworker example, if that same person gets fired, I'm not running out to network with them, add them on LinkedIn or interview them for another position. I thank my lucky stars they're gone and swiftly move on.
He probably gets interviews because he submits his resume (which we’ve all read)....I dont think its a case of teams seeking him out...at all..He's in the same 'where are they now' category as Peter Chiarelli.
Gillis didnt get the Oilers job because of his poor drafting according to mark Spector.
It really is.
Like I said, I have no doubt that @sting101 is accurate when he's saying there were plans to take him before the draft (and not from the scouting staff). But I find it impossible to believe that 'Scouting GM' Jim Benning couldn't have changed that if he wanted to. The guy was literally hired to 'fix the drafting' and then you're not going to take his first recommendation if he wants someone else?
There has never been an iota of an indication that Benning wasn't totally in line with that pick and shouldn't have to fully own that pick.
He didnt build it ..He inherited all the primary pieces.
Luongo/Schneider
The Sedins
Salo
Edler
Bieksa
Burrows
Kesler
but hamhuis
but Myers! Oh wait...
i can't figure out how that is a burn. sorry.
Credit to those players..especially Markstrom, but without QH and EP, and Miller (and Myers) last year...we wouldnt have even been anywhere near playoff contention.in that case I case last years team was a Gillis team.
Edler
Horvat
Tanev
Markstrom
.
Credit to those players..especially Markstrom, but without QH and EP, and Miller (and Myers) last year...we wouldnt have even been anywhere near playoff contention.