My complaint is not really with Reinhart. It's overpaying for him when he have a similar player in Musil who was decent in his call up. It's more of a criticism towards Chia than Reinhart. What is questionable is what Chia did in the offseason when he decided to go ahead and change last season positives instead of the area of weaknesses. The wagon line was good, why split them? Roy was good with Yak, why not re-sign him in case of injuries? Musil was decent, why trade for Reinhart and keep the assets for a big time trade like Hamonic? It's like Chia didn't want to recognize MacT's positives. I know it's funny as it sounds. Work around the weakness not changes the positives. If it's not broken, don't fix it.
Yeah but the same could apply to Yakupov. The Oilers burned a 1st overall pick (an extremely valuable asset) on an underperforming player.
Yak shouldn't be immune to criticism. I'm just saying it's hypocritical to get on people for criticizing an underperforming 3+ year player when in the same token, you and some others criticize a player who has been here for 19 games.
Again, Yak has as many goals as Davidson, less than Klefbom. He played 12 of those games with McDavid. Some criticism is expected and completely warranted.
He's not a kid anymore. It's time to put up or shut up, he's not putting up much.
I just want to clarify that I really like Yak and I love when he's playing well but he needs to start producing. All the effort in the world is great but gotta start putting the puck in the net.