ForumNamePending
Registered User
- Mar 31, 2012
- 2,666
- 1,022
They're definitely not "lighting the world on fire", nobody is saying they are. But they're way better than many expected or realize, and they're much better than "treading water" as of late. I'm pretty sure they're like 8-2-2 in their past 12 or something like that. That's pretty good. And they've beaten Dallas twice, Carolina twice, the Jackets(who are still a decent team), etc. Its not like they're only able to beat DET....
After 20 games (over 1/3 the season) they are in the mushy middle of the league, but fair points. It's probably too early to draw any meaningful conclusion on a team like Chicago, but I'm struggling with the idea they are better off without a guy who would still be their top centre.
Last edited: