The Soviet School: Early articles by Tarasov & Co

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,541
4,938
In this thread I will provide summaries of 1950s-1960s articles from the Russian monthly Спортивные игры ("Sporting Games") mirroring the early development of Soviet hockey. The articles were written by Soviet coaches, officials and players. Two such articles have already been presented over the last 18 months in threads of their own: Nikolay Sologubov's call for "all in attack, all in defence" from February 1958 and Vladimir Yegorov's observations on Canadian techniques and tactics from October 1958. More will follow in this thread.

Register of the articles:
A. Novokreshchonov: The hockey players of the club 'Penticton' (July 1955)
V. Donskoy
: For variety in attack (February 1956)
A. Tarasov:
Crucial matches (March 1956): Part 1, Part 2
N. Sologubov: All in attack, all in defence (February 1958)
V. Yegorov
: On attack and defence: Some traits of the tactics of Canadian hockey players (October 1958)
 
Last edited:

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,541
4,938
The first article to be presented here was pinned by Aleksandr Novokreshchonov. Born in 1914, Novokreshchonov had a career as athlete in soccer and bandy before switching to "hockey with the puck" in 1947. He played for VVS Moscow in 1947-1948 and served as player-coach with Lokomotiv Moscow from 1948-1950. In the mid-1950s he was employed as "State Coach" by the Soviet Sports Committee to supervise and advance the development of puck hockey and to coordinate and monitor the acitivites of the various Soviet national selections (first/A national team, second/B national team, junior teams).

Novokhreshchonov's article was published in the July 1955 issue of the Sporting Games magazine and was dedicated to the Penticton Vees club that had successfully represented Canada at the 1955 World Championship. The way Penticton played is introduced as "typical for the Canadian school of hockey in general" and the article even comes with a picture from an NHL game between Toronto Maple Leafs and Detroit Red Wings.

%25D0%259D%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B2%25D0%25BE%25D0%25BA%25D1%2580%25D0%25B5%25D1%2589%25D0%25B5%25D0%25BD%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B2%2B7.jpg

Aleksandr Novokreshchonov

NovoP1.png

Novokreshchonov's article, first page (http://lib.sportedu.ru/GetImage.exe?25568)

NovoP2.png

Novokreshchonov's article, second page (http://lib.sportedu.ru/GetImage.exe?25569)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Namba 17

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,541
4,938
Aleksandr Novokreshchonov:

Novokreshchonov describes the "Canadian school of hockey" as an aggressive and fast offensive game.

"The Canadians play an attacking style of hockey at an extremely high pace. All their actions are subject to the same aim: To shoot as soon as possible and conquer the opponent's goal. (…) The Canadians attack vigorously and purposefully. The main thing for them is to make a shot on goal. Therefore, the goal is under constant fire. (…) In almost every game, the Canadians scored goals from close range – from the area in front of the goal. As soon as the team enters the offensive zone, one and sometimes two players head to the goal and, receiving the puck, they attack the net or pick up a rebound from someone else's shot."​

The high level of technical skills the Canadian players possess allows them to attack in different ways.

"The Canadians have a variety of ways to enter the offensive zone: They use a shot or go individually through the zone or pass the puck to a partner. (...) The Canadian players had an advantage over our players in technical skill, in high individual quality. Their technique made it possible to carry out attacks according to a variety of tactical plans."​

In particular, Novokreshchonov highlights the skating and stickhandling abilities of the Canadians.

"The players of Penticton are quick, smart and skillful skaters with sharp acceleration. This enables them to play and attack at fast pace. Their attacks are efficient and varied. They skate with upright body, the head slightly raised.
Almost always do they hold the sticks firmly with both hands, which makes it difficult to knock it off or turn it aside. Skillfully handling their sticks and the puck, the players make use of a variety of techniques in a complex environment with ease. Pushing it forward with frequent strikes on the left and the right, the Canadians carry the puck ahead. To get past an opponent, they use many distracting movements and actions.
For example, a player seems to send the puck directly to an opponent, but with a reciprocal move he picks up the puck again and instantly goes in the other direction. Another example: A player moves directly towards an opponent at high speed and after making a distracting movement with his body, he sharply changes direction at the last moment."​

Novokreshchonov also gives the Canadians good grades for their passing game: He says they use a lot of diverse passes and execute them with quickness and accuracy.

"The Canadians prefer to pass the puck to a player who has already gained speed. They often use long longitudinal and diagonal passes. The player who receives the puck approaches the next zone as fast as he can. For example, if a defenceman wins the puck in his own zone, he moves to the neutral zone and makes a strong pass to his winger who is located roughly at the blue line. The puck goes precisely to the blade of the winger's stick. The forward, having already picked up speed before receiving the puck, breaks into the offensive zone and often finds himself one-on-one with the goaltender. With one such pass, the Canadians manage to beat several opponents at once."​

However, if no good passing option is available, the Canadian defencemen are also able to hold on to the puck.

"If he doesn't see a partner who isn't unguided, the defenceman is usually in no hurry to pass the puck. Possessing high technical skill, the defenceman just keeps the pucks and only passes it after creating advantageous positions for his partner."​

The Canadian defencemen also show up in in the offensive zone themselves:

"Sometimes the defenceman who has won the puck and finds himself in a favourable position goes ahead himself and makes a shot at the goal. (...) For the final shots on the goal, the Canadians often use their defencemen."​

In the shooting technique, Novokreshchonov doesn't see a difference between Canadian and Soviet players. True, the Canadians have also demonstrated a new technique, the slap shot, but the Soviets have already managed to adapt it. (Note that the term Novokreshchonov uses is Удар-бросок which nowadays isn't used for the slap shot. But when Novokreshchonov wrote the article, this shot was a novelty to the Soviets and the terminology was still in flux. The date of the article – 1955 – and the description of the shot – a "big swing" and a very strong shot that however "rarely succeeds in acute game situations since it takes a long time" – fit the slap shot.)

Another technical feature of the Canadians lies in their frequent bodychecking.

"In contrast to the European rules, the domestic Canadian rules allow bodychecking throughout the entire rink. Therefore the game with the body has been familiar to the Canadians for a long time and they have brought it to perfection. The experience of almost a century, the early specialization of the young men, the existence of professional teams and the high physical burden of the competition – all that shapes the dynamic and rough character of the Canadian game and it gives the players the drive to compete hard even under the most difficult circumstances. (…)
In the ability to play the body, the Canadians are far superior to the teams of other countries. This effective and powerful technique is constantly employed throughout the entire game by both defencemen and forwards. The Canadians particularly often use the bodycheck to take the puck from an opponent at the boards. Physical play, whether used by them or against them, does not affect their ability to execute the combinations they want to do.
The physical play of the Canadians often turns into rudeness. During the World Championship, the Canadian team took the largest number of penalties [out of all teams]."​

When the opponent wins the puck, the Canadians switch to defending.

"Going to the defence, the Canadians do not line up before their own blue line, but continue to fight for the puck while retreating and prevent the opponent in every way from organizing an attack. The Canadians seems to skate back [even] faster than they attack. Once they're in their own half of the rink, all of them play the body with confidence and toughness. The defencemen show great dedication. Sometimes they sit down or lie down directly under the shot, trying in any way to intercept the puck on its way to the Canadian goal."​

Finally, Novokreshchonov also highlights the tactical and mental discipline displayed by the Canadians.

"The Canadians showed themselves as strong-willed sportsmen. In their matches with the main opponents, the players of Penticton never fell into the offside position. No bickering among the players on the ice was noticeable. Bodychecks by the opponent didn't irrirate them. The Canadians, whether they were checked cleanly or not cleanly, quickly got up again and immediately continued to play."
Having described the strength of the Canadian play (minus the penalty minutes they took), Novokreshchonov proceeds to outline some of the weaknesses:

"Carried away by the attacks, the forwards and defencemen often allowed 3-against-2 and even 3-against-1 situations in their own end. Opponents who played a fast collective game with one-touch passes were able to upset the game of the Canadians and reduce the effectiveness of their physical play. (...) The advantage of the Soviet team was maintained as long as our players used tactical combinations with fast and accurate passes, often one-touch passes. But in the middle of the second period, the pace of the game decreased and the Canadians took over. That's when we lost the match."​

Novokreshchonov concludes:

"What do the Soviet players need to improve their skills and to be able to fight for the primacy of the world with confidence?
It is necessary to continue to pay great attention to the general physical training. We need to make sure our players are superior to foreign players in speed, agility and strength. This will allow them to win individual combats.
It is critical to put a lot of work into polishing technique and to improve the individual skill level of each player dramatically.
It is extremely important to improve the tactics of the game and strive for a greater variety of tactical combinations. The sooner the players master the techniques, the easier, fuller and better this will become possible. (...)
Finally, we need a lot of educational work to rise strong-willed players. Determination, perseverance, insistence and the will to win must always be inherent in our hockey players.
A high level of physical fitness, excellent technique, flexible and diverse tactics and the will to win are the key to high sportsmanship and to the success of the Soviet hockey players in the upcoming international matches."​

Novokreshchonov's article is supplemented with three graphics visualizing Canadian plays:

NovoSchem.png

(http://hockey99.ru/uploads/posts/2015-04/1429568727_novyy-33.jpg)

Schema 1 and 2: The Canadians use every opportunity for fast counterattacks. Here we have two examples of Canadian defencemen using long passes to start attacks from their own end and leave several opponents trailing behind the attacking winger.
Schema 3: This time the Canadians are in the offensive zone. Both wingers (7 and 9) rush towards the goal so that the Canadian center (8) has two passing options.
 
Last edited:

Canadiens1958

Registered User
Nov 30, 2007
20,020
2,779
Lake Memphremagog, QC.
Rather interesting perspectives offered. In Canada the Leafs and Canadiens were viewed as playing a defensive game - physical forechecking.

Also schemas 1 and 2 show that the Canadian tactics were based on the NA rules where the Red Line was in play for offsides. Passes are shown as strategized and completed before or at the center Red Line.
 

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,541
4,938
1955 World Championship game between the Penticton Vees and the Soviet national team:



Penticton Vees:
Bill Warwick (10) – Jack McIntyre (12) – Grant Warwick (14)
Jack McDonald (7) – Dick Warwick (9) – Doug Kilburn (8)
Jim Middleton (17) – Mike Shabaga (15) – Jim Fairburn (11)

Hal Tarala (4) – Jack Taggart (2)
George McAvoy (3, C) – Kevin Conway (5)

Ivan McLelland​

Soviet Union:
Vsevolod Bobrov (9, C) – Viktor Shuvalov (8) – Yevgeny Babich (7)
Valentin Kuzin (10) – Aleksandr Uvarov (11) – Yury Krylov (6)
Nikolay Khlystov (12) – Aleksey Guryshev (14) – Mikhail Bychkov (13)

Ivan Tregubov (4) – Nikolay Sologubov (3)
Alfred Kuchevsky (2) – Dmitry Ukolov (5)

Nikolay Puchkov
(Grigory Mkrtychan)

The report by Arch MacKenzie of the Canadian press chimes with Novokreshchonov's opinion that the Soviet forwards were lacking tactical variety:

"They worked a cross-rink pass effectively and their wingers looked pretty fair. (...) The Russians tried one rigid attack pattern and when this failed they were lost. They let their wingers handle the puck as they moved down the ice. After crossing the attacking blueline the Russians invariably passed to their centre. The Canadians soon solved the attacks, nipping off the Russians around the blueline by concentrating on their wingers."​

Other comments from the Canadian side:

Bill Warwick: "We outsmarted them, outskated them, outpassed them and outplayed them."

Tommy Moore (brother of Dickie Moore): "Actually they just skated the Russians into the ice and knocked off the right men with bodychecks."

Sources:
Ottawa Citizen, March 7th 1955
Calgary Herald, March 7th 1955
 
  • Like
Reactions: Batis and Killion

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,541
4,938
The next article I want to present was written by Vasily Donskoy (1912-1998). Donskoy had a career as soccer and bandy player prior to WWII. After the war, he became one of the first Soviet ice hockey referees. Later honoured as "best hockey referee in the USSR" (annually from 1960-1965), his career lasted until his retirement in 1974.

543198.jpg

Donskoy in the 1964 movie Hockey players where he "acted" as a hockey referee.

DonP1.png

Donskoy's article, first page (http://lib.sportedu.ru/GetImage.exe?25802)

DonP2.png

Donskoy's article, second page (http://lib.sportedu.ru/GetImage.exe?25803)
 
Last edited:

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,541
4,938
Vasily Donskoy: "For Variety in Attack" (February 1956)

Vasily Donskoy bemoans that most Soviet clubs aren't competitive with the three top teams CSK MO (Red Army), Dinamo Moscow and Krylya Sovietov. Their shortcomings: Subpar technique, lacking physical preparation and tactical weaknesses. Donskoy echoes Aleksandr Novokreshchonov's complain about a lack of tactical variety, but only applies this to the non-elite clubs:

"Most of our teams do not have a their own characteristic 'handwriting' of the game, their repertoire of offensive and defensive means is small. For example, when you watch the games of most teams, you notice that their attacks are all of the same type. Naturally, the opponent adapts to those attacks quickly."​

Donskoy divides the process of attacking in hockey into three phases.

"First phase: the forwards rendezvous with the defencemen and overcome the neutral zone. They overcome the opponent's first line of defence (usually consisting of the three forwards) and enter the offensive zone.
Second phase: the forwards advance further, overcome the opponent's second line of defence (consisting of two defencemen) and complete the attack by shooting on the goal.
Third phase: If the attack did not result in a goal but the attacking team didn't lose the puck, siege is layed to the goal of the opponent. The attack includes all players of the team. Using various passes, they again and again seek for an opportunity to shoot on goal."​

How can the first line of defence be overcome? Donskoy gives a scenario: Two forwards (players 5 and 4 in the schema) move at "maximum speed" and pass the puck between each other. The third forward (6) moves on the other side of the rink and gets ready to receive a pass. Meanwhile the puck carrier (5 or 4) is approached by an opposing forward. Now forwards 5 and 4 need to "creatively" decide what to do: try to get by the opponent on one's own or get the puck either to player 4 (schema 1) or to player 6 far to the left (schema 2).

DonSch1.jpg

(http://hockey99.ru/uploads/posts/2015-05/1431885892_bezymyannyy-10.jpg)

Vasily Donskoy singles out Dinamo Moscow (coached by Arkady Chernyshov) as a team that makes creative use of both passing options and quickly proceeds from phase 1 to phase 2 of the attack.

Donskoy then points out a few other possible options of how to get into the offensive zone. Several involve distracting and deceiving the opponent. In the following example, the center (player 5) carries the puck. The two wingers (players 4 and 6) switch positions and appear to look for a pass from the center to distract the opponent (schema 5). Of course, an actual pass to one of the wingers is also an option. In schema 6, the same operation is performed, but this time a defenceman (player 2) joins the attack and offers another passing option.

DonSch2.jpg

(http://hockey99.ru/uploads/posts/2015-05/1431885892_bezymyannyy-12.jpg)

Next Donskoy remarks that "most teams underestimate and still rarely use the boards in the attack", even though one can use them for "a lot of beautiful combinations". One example (schema 7): The puck carrier (player 6) is approached by a defenceman and sends the puck into the corner . Player 5 picks up the rebounding puck, skates behind the goal and turns towards the slot. He can now either shoot himself or pass to either player 4 or 6.

The varieties provided so far were mostly concerning phase 1 and 2 of the attack. As for phase 3, Donskoy recommends what he calls the "envelope" formation (schema 8) which offers several passing options.

DonSch3.jpg

(http://hockey99.ru/uploads/posts/2015-05/1431885913_bezymyannyy-13.jpg)

One mistake many teams tend to make in phase 3 is that once the puck is lost, the forwards skate back and turn into defencemen. Donskoy singles out CSK MO (coached by Anatoly Tarasov) as having the right approach:

"Having lost the puck in this phase of the attack, the army players don't even think about retreat. On the contrary, they fight hard to win the puck back again. A tight ring of players is formed immediately around the opposing puck carrier...".​

Donskoy closes his articles by stating that each coach should apply the tactical schemes according to the "characteristics of the individual players" and that it's also up to the coaches to "raise" among their "pupils" players who are capable of organizing the attack. The main thing is that teams should have "in their arsenal not one, but several different attacking combinations".
 
Last edited:

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,541
4,938
A new article I want to present was written by Anatoly Tarasov and was published in the March 1956 issue of "Sporting Games". It is titled "Crucial matches" and gives a review of the games between the Soviet national team (coached by Arkady Chernyshov and Vladimir Yegorov) and the United States of America and Canada at the 1956 Olympic Winter Games in Cortina d'Ampezzo.

February 3rd 1956: USSR vs USA 4-0 (0-0, 1-0, 3-0)
February 4th 1956: USSR vs Canada 2-0 (0-0, 1-0, 1-0)

Link to Tarasov's March 1956 article (five pages): http://lib.sportedu.ru/Images2.idc?DocID=205420

The presentation will be split into two parts. Part 1: Review of the game against the USA. Part 2: Review of the game against Canada.
 

Theokritos

Global Moderator
Apr 6, 2010
12,541
4,938
Anatoly Tarasov (March 1956):

Part 1: USSR vs USA 4-0

"Counting on their good physical training, the American players set forth a high tempo. In the first five minutes there wasn't a single whistle. Both teams only changed players once. Trying to take the puck away from our players, the Americans attacked all over the ice and imposed a power struggle from which they often emerged victoriously. (...)

What is the tactical plan of the Americans? They seek to counterattack vigorously in the expectation that our forwards will not be able to skate back in time once they lose the puck in the American end. This is how the Americans succeeded in their game against Canada [4-1 win USA]. The low-speed defencemen of the Canadians couldn't cope with the technically strong and fast attacking Americans. But in this game the picture is different. The Soviet forwards quickly retreated to the defence at the right moment and the Soviet defencemen had enough speed to cope with their mobile opponents. (...)

The Americans attacked without support of their defencemen. Meeting the numerical superiority of our players, the American forwards didn't risk advancing close to our goal. Instead they restored to shots from afar. Once a shot had been fired, one of their forwards rushed ahead to the goal to pick up the puck if it bounced off the goaltender. (...) The gap between the forwards and defencemen of the Americans created good opportunities for our team to counterattack."

In the 14th minute the Americans take a penalty:

"But even now the US team adheres to the same tactics and try to attack our players all over the rink. It thoroughly exhausts the strength of the Americans and there are still 2 ½ periods of intense play ahead in the game!

Then both teams are at even strength again. 2-3 minutes of sharp attacks pass and now the Americans change their tactics somewhat. They begin to attack our players more cautiously and allow them to enter their zone freely. Instead of going after the Soviet forwards all over the ice, the Americans move the game to a smaller area in order to make it easier to force their physical play on our athletes, to wear them down and deprive them of an important weapon: their speed and mobility. Figuring out that plan, the Soviet players adjust their game: They avoid the physical battles and try to pass the puck to their partners quickly. Good scoring opportunities result: Ukolov and Khlystov come up with strong shots on the goal and Guryshev produces two unexpected shots towards the upper corner, but every time goaltender [Willard] Ikola demonstrates his fine artistry."

Second period:

"After the break, the Americans again try to enforce physical battles, but the Soviet players, showing a fast and crisp collective game, don't allow the game to turn physical."

In the 35th minute of play, the USSR make it 1-0. See video with comment at the bottom of the post. Trailing by one goal, the Americans revive their attacking attempts, but fail to score. The game shifts to the American zone again:

"The advantage of our team is becoming more obvious every minute. By the end of the second period the Soviet players look much fresher. The difference is promising. The Americans defend stubbornly. They block shots and restore to their bodychecking."

Third period:

"The Soviet players continue to push the opponent. The Americans are counterattacking less and less, and then only with two forwards. Individual forays are easily stopped by our defencemen who act very tencious and tactically sharp."

Then the Soviets take a penalty:

"The Americans rush to the attack. They play with five forwards. Their two best players John Mayasich and Bill Cleary with their fine technique and their strong and accurate shots are entrusted with the positions at the blue line."

The Americans give the puck away. The Soviets pass it around and manage to kill more than one minute of the penalty:

"And then Pantyukhin becomes guilty of excessive self-confidence. Carried away by the individual game, he gets tired and loses the puck while trying to circle yet another opponent. A goal is only prevented because our team remains cool and Puchkov shows his mastery. (...)

We attack. Shuvalov delivers two well-aimed shots from a promising position. Another attack – Bobrov shoots. A shot by Pantyukhin follows. Then Sologubov goes around two Americans and provides a strong shot from 5-6 meters. But no goal! Once again we must pay tribute to the impressively calm and unwavering performance of the American goaltender Willard Ikola."

In the 56th minute Ikola is finally beaten a second time. See video with comment at the bottom of the post.

"Naturally, the American hockey players make a desperate attempt to bounce back. Bill Cleary bursts into our zone. Our defencemen push him to the board, apply a bodycheck and take away the puck. Inspired by their success, our players double their activity. It's obvious that the Americans are tired. This has to be taken advantage of! It only takes 45 seconds after the second goal until our third troika starts another fast attack."

Within one minute, Ikola is beaten again for the 0-3. See video with comment at the bottom of the post. Soon afterwards the Soviets score another one. Final score: USA 0, USSR 4.

Tarasov adds a statistic to his review:

Shots on goal:

USSR
Entire game: 20 overall, 17 of them "dangerous"
1st period: 6 overall, 5 of them "dangerous"
2nd period: 6 overall, 6 of them "dangerous"
3rd period: 8 overall, 6 of them "dangerous"

USA
Entire game: 17 overall, 7 of them "dangerous"
1st period: 9 overall, 3 of them "dangerous"
2nd period: 5 overall, 2 of them "dangerous"
3rd period: 3 overall, 2 of them "dangerous"​

Bodychecks:

USSR
Entire game: 5 on the open ice, 3 at the board
1st period: 3 on the open ice, 0 at the board
2nd period: 1 on the open ice, 1 at the board
3rd period: 1 on the open ice, 2 at the board

USA
Entire game: 9 on the open ice, 6 at the board
1st period: 2 on the open ice, 3 at the board
2nd period: 4 on the open ice, 2 at the board
3rd period: 3 on the open ice, 1 at the board​

The goals:



1-0 USSR, 35th minute of play: 4:37 to 4:43 of the video.
Soviet RW Yury Pantyukhov gets away from two backchecking forwards in the offensive zone and sends the puck between goaltender Ikola and defenceman McKinnon (#2) into the slot. LW Nikolay Khlystov is there to put in his stick and tap the puck into the net.

2-0 USSR, 56th minute of play: 5:22 to 5:26 of the video.
Yevgeny Babich carries the puck towards the American goal. Faced by a defenceman, he leaves the puck to the trailing Bobrov but keeps going as if he still had the puck. Bobrov blasts the puck into the corner to the left of Ikola.

3-0 USSR, 56th minute of play: 5:35 to 5:46 of the video.
Khlystov rushes around the opposing goal, slows down and passes the puck to Pantyukhov. The goaltender expects another pass to center Alexey Guryshev in the high slot, but Pantyukhov surprises him with a shot from the distance.

4-0 USSR, 58th minute of play: not in the video.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DN28 and Batis

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad