One of the crucial areas Hawks must improve on this season to make the playoffs and contend is the PP... So there was much ballyhoo about the Haks going to a 1-3-1 scheme to try to improve PP results ...presumably there would only be 1 dman playing the entire blue line. .and Hawks would pressure with 4 forwards one of them playing in the semi-high middle slot to direct pucks to either side or get off a shot from there and the other 3 forwards could crash the net when that happened. .. However we see that KEITH is still the #1 PP d-man in this 1-3-1 configuration and that on the 2nd PP unit Q now has 2 d-man playing the point in a traditional 3-2 format...So it seems the scheme is split with 2 sets of differing structures...He has His and Sean at the points in the traditional 3-2 2nd unit structure. Now.. since Kane and Tie wasted both on unit #1 of the op ..the scheme was changed to try to help them score more...Kane has been lousy the previous 2 seasons on the PP with just 22 and 23 points respectively ..In his career Kane only cracked 40 PP points once ..but had others between 35-39 a few times too. .Fore sure we cannot be paying any $10.5 for just 22 or 23 PP points...If you want to get 80-90 points in the NHL you will need about 40 from the PP. .So Kane should be able to get near 40 PP points if he gives us 80-90 points or more overall.. But with Toews. ..we know he is not capable ofv80-90 point seasons... Since he cannot do that...40 PP points for him is impossible. .and if we get just his usual high teens or low 20s PP points then why is he even on any PP unit ? He is not good enough a PP guy to even be considered for the 2nd PP unit..and again n why are we allocating $10.5 on the cap for such a poor PP guy? Do not get me started with Keith on any PP unit .. You know the drill....he will attempt 9 shots...3 will be blocked and 4 will miss the net....2 will get on net but the opps goalie will make stops on these other 2 look routine. So ...scheme change will not help that first unit...Kane Toews and Keith will ruin that 1st PP because they are not good on the PP. .. Could any other peronnell do better? There must be someone better? ?