GDT: The Powerhouse at Buffalo | 2/15/19 - 7PM - MSG, NHLN

Status
Not open for further replies.

Harbour Dog

Registered User
Jul 16, 2015
10,335
13,029
St. John's
7-4-1 in the last 12. That's pretty ****ing good for what people thought was a bottom 3 team

No idea why "bottom 3 team" was on anybody's radar to start the season. It's just as hard to separate yourself on the shitty end of the spectrum as it is at the top.

Just because we started to move into a rebuild, people thought we'd automatically be a bottom-feeder. Without Zucc and Hayes we'll find some more losses, but this current roster is not even bottom 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband and bl02

bl02

Registered User
Jan 13, 2014
32,319
22,380
No idea why "bottom 3 team" was on anybody's radar to start the season. It's just as hard to separate yourself on the ****ty end of the spectrum as it is at the top.

Just because we started to move into a rebuild, people thought we'd automatically be a bottom-feeder. Without Zucc and Hayes we'll find some more losses, but this current roster is not even bottom 10.
I agree with Hayes and Zucc this roster is barely bottom 8,9,10. Just hoping the likes of the Kings/Oilers/ Coyotes stay close enough so somehow we can get to a top 7 pick somehow.
 

Rempe73

RIP King of Pop
Mar 26, 2018
12,572
12,284
New Jersey
No idea why "bottom 3 team" was on anybody's radar to start the season. It's just as hard to separate yourself on the ****ty end of the spectrum as it is at the top.

Just because we started to move into a rebuild, people thought we'd automatically be a bottom-feeder. Without Zucc and Hayes we'll find some more losses, but this current roster is not even bottom 10.
We’re a one line team and our defense is horrible. All it takes is our goaltending to be average to below average, and we’re a bottom 3-5 team.
 

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
41,880
52,234
In High Altitoad
No idea why "bottom 3 team" was on anybody's radar to start the season. It's just as hard to separate yourself on the ****ty end of the spectrum as it is at the top.

Just because we started to move into a rebuild, people thought we'd automatically be a bottom-feeder. Without Zucc and Hayes we'll find some more losses, but this current roster is not even bottom 10.

They've been shifting between 7-12 on a day to day basis.

It's very much a bottom 10 team that has gotten pretty lucky along the way. Post deadline they'll solidify themselves into the bottom 5-7.
 

darko

Registered User
Feb 16, 2009
70,269
7,797
No idea why "bottom 3 team" was on anybody's radar to start the season. It's just as hard to separate yourself on the ****ty end of the spectrum as it is at the top.

Just because we started to move into a rebuild, people thought we'd automatically be a bottom-feeder. Without Zucc and Hayes we'll find some more losses, but this current roster is not even bottom 10.

Had us pegged in 6-10 range before the season and looks like that's where we end up. Probably closer to 10 than to 6.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad