- Feb 23, 2006
- 18,526
- 4,150
In comparison, Ben Bishop had two assists last night.
Yes, and Petry is the one with 1G 1A. The other three have been simply horrible with 1A in 32GP and -9.
In comparison, Ben Bishop had two assists last night.
Well then, what do either Flynn or Mitchell bring to this team that we lacked? What positive contributions do either of them make on the ice?
According to natural-stat-trick, Mitchell has played 96 minutes for us. In that time, he's managed to be on ice for an incredible 120 shot attempts against, and just 47 for. That's a shot-attempt bleed rate that's... unfathomably bad. Even for us!
Flynn is barely any better. 64 minutes on ice, 87 attempts against, 42 for. At least we've managed to score 1 G while Flynn was on the ice.
These are two of the very worst sets of possession numbers on the entire team. In fact only Malhotra's numbers are worse!
I know Therrien doesn't preach puck possession, he doesn't even believe in it. But when you take an already bad system, and add two clearly sub-par players to it, you're just making the problem worse, not better.
We would've been better off never acquiring those two, and we'll be better off next season without them. Maybe they'll latch on somewhere else and stink up someone else's 4th line. Don't know, don't care. Neither of them are probably going to have long NHL careers.
The trio of DSP, Mitchell and Flynn have played a combined 35 games and have produced 1 assist and are a combined -10.
Safe to say that these guys not only are not producing but have affected team chemistry in a bad way...
Agreed... so far. But at least we still have some games for things to turn around. DSP is obviously back next season anyway. I don't see a good argument - yet! - for entertaining any thoughts of bringing Flynn or Mitchell back. This surprises me... I honestly thought on deadline day that they'd chip in at least a little bit and become candidates for spots on the team next season.Petry is good, but he's not exactly 5 million+ good. That said, I wouldn't mind re-signing him in the ~4-4.5 mil for 4 years. He's a bit like Emelin in that he provides a certain brand of hockey with some flaws. The rest of the acquisitions are strikes and a strike out for the org.
probably because they are both black. But imo dsp would be best served to train with pacioretty. Since dsp should be training for speed imo. Subban trains for power/strentgh from what i see.why does this keep coming up? How is it that Subban will automatically train this guy and why does it have to be subban. Gallagher trains with Lucic which makes no sense at all, but it is who he trains with.
probably because they are both black. But imo dsp would be best served to train with pacioretty. Since dsp should be training for speed imo. Subban trains for power/strentgh from what i see.
"Depth" =/= "AHL-calibre trash who can't contribute in any positive way at the NHL level"Having additional depth for the playoffs is only a good thing.
"Depth" =/= "AHL-calibre trash who can't contribute in any positive way at the NHL level"
I'd sooner have kept the draft picks than waste them on players of Flynn & Mitchell's calibre. As for DSP/Sekac, that was clearly a Therrien-vendetta-driven move and one that severely dented my confidence in Bergevin's competence to manage this team to #25. All told, we added three junk bottom-6'ers for one useful prospect and two draft picks. That's not a win in any definition of the word.
Petry was a good pickup, but he's a rental. Likely gone in the offseason.
One game, don't get too high or low just yet.