The OMENS --signs point to TURRIS
- Thread starter hawksfan50
- Start date
Beauty eh?
Not sure if serious.
Vatican Roulette
Baile de Los Locos
anonymous9739872329
Registered User
Rabid Ranger
2 is better than one
DisgruntledHawkFan
Blackhawk Down
We're sorry about him. He has a history of going a tad postal and then never, ever coming back to read through a thread he's started. Best to just leave him be.
UPDATE: I thought of even more OMENS:
IF the Hawks took Kane he would wear #88 his favourite number --as he wore in London: BUT that is Lindros' number=CONCUSSION CITY1 AVOID!!!AVOID!!!
However if the Hawkstake Turris--since the other "T" in "TnT" (Toews) is wearing #19,the obvious marketing ploy would be to give Turris #91....it just is such a pefect
fit down the middle...
IF the Hawks took Kane he would wear #88 his favourite number --as he wore in London: BUT that is Lindros' number=CONCUSSION CITY1 AVOID!!!AVOID!!!
However if the Hawkstake Turris--since the other "T" in "TnT" (Toews) is wearing #19,the obvious marketing ploy would be to give Turris #91....it just is such a pefect
fit down the middle...
V13
Fire Sell Tank
This thread is fantastic 
.So much comedic value
And Spree , you should rename yourself The Tube King
.So much comedic value And Spree , you should rename yourself The Tube King
AD
Registered User
I can make a very very educated guess on this one! oh I know! pick me!
Nobody is picking Tavares next year, bet your house on it.
nanzenkills
Registered User
Odontya
Registered User
- May 24, 2006
- 117
- 0
No 1 + 9 = 10; so Turris wears 10 and 19 backwards is 91 which just happens to be TAVARES' number in the OHL!!!!!! Tavares - Toews - Turris. 19+91+10 = 120 which is the number of questions on my chem final SO IT MUST BE TRUE.
/out.
Dicky Dangles
dangles the puck.
But, Turris' favorite player, and the guy he patterns his game after, is Yzerman, so if he were to wear 91, by your (il)logic, he'd have the complete opposite career of Yzerman, and be a complete bust.
Kane will go to Chicago and wear #88, never living up to his Stanley Cup potential, like Eric Lindros, and Turris will go to Philly and be our #19, bringing us the Stanley Cup that Yzerman and the Wings took away from us in '97. How's that for reading into BS?
nanzenkills
Registered User
Hey, didn't Alexandre Daigle wear #91? And didn't Alexei Yashin wear #19? Tell us about those omens, hawksfan.
I believe the only2 curent NHL players wearing #91 are Marc Savard and Sergei Ferdorov--so if Turris did get picked by CHI,and chose 91 (since he can't have Toews #19),that would not be a bad combo: Savard's play-making,Fedorov's goal scoring (in his prime) --I'd take that...
Dale Tallon has stated that he expects his #1 pick to step into the lineup immediately. Turris CANNOT do this next season as he will simply get smoked, sorry to say.
Besides Turris himself knows his own physical limitations and has the intelligent foresight to know that he needs a couple of years at Wisconsin to grow more & hit the weight-room as much as possible.
Kane CAN step in and likely play pro next year & survive with a lesser likelyhood of getting physically destroyed. He has demonstrated an innate ability to protect the puck so well from bigger faster players in the world ala his play in the OHL, and international levels (World Junior tournament).
The big question surrounding Kane IMO is whether or not he will grow much more since he is quickly approaching 19 years of age and is still considered smallish even by todays NHL player-size standards.
Besides Turris himself knows his own physical limitations and has the intelligent foresight to know that he needs a couple of years at Wisconsin to grow more & hit the weight-room as much as possible.
Kane CAN step in and likely play pro next year & survive with a lesser likelyhood of getting physically destroyed. He has demonstrated an innate ability to protect the puck so well from bigger faster players in the world ala his play in the OHL, and international levels (World Junior tournament).
The big question surrounding Kane IMO is whether or not he will grow much more since he is quickly approaching 19 years of age and is still considered smallish even by todays NHL player-size standards.
As Bob MCKenzie said about what we learned about the Ducks winning the Stanley Cup : "SIZE MATTERS" ...so the Buffalo Model that everyone was praising just a few weeks ago was shown up by a bigger Ottawa squad who in turn was handled by a bigger Anaheim team (actually Ottawa was bigger on average than the Ducks but Anaheim's big players played lots and impacted the outcome) ...
Not that Turris willbe a BIG player--but certainly lots bigger than Kane ...
Also Tallon said he "hoped" the guy he picked could step in right away,not that he definitely would --sure Turris is going to Wisconsin--but Tallon also said of Turris he
thought a year at Wisconsin to bulk up and Turris could be in the NHL ..to many of us we think more likely 2 yrs at least to gain that bigger body --but who knows?
The point is Tallon has saidmany things in different interviews including that it DEFINITELY would be either KANE ,TURRIS or JVR as the Chicago pick --he also said they would not trade the pick unless it helped the club IMMEDIATELY (so the speculation about trading down 1-2 spots with PHI or PHX seems out if they only included their other first rounder* -BUT not ruled out is a combination trade down +immediate asset kind of deal (* or ,possibly Tallon meant he would not trade one of his "final 3 " ="the pick" Chicago would take/settle for --but that means mAYBE
he would move down 1-2 spots if the sweeteener were PHI or PHX's second first round pick) --MAYBEwhat Tallon means is that he only would trade one of his final 3 (ie. move out of any top 3 pick position) IF he got back immediate assets oran immmediate asset +lower first round pick than the Top 3...
In other words TALLON still is keeping his options open... Itmay indeed be Kane--but perhaps not --you cannot go by just 1 of his varied statements which are also subject to some interpretation as to what he really means.
Not that Turris willbe a BIG player--but certainly lots bigger than Kane ...
Also Tallon said he "hoped" the guy he picked could step in right away,not that he definitely would --sure Turris is going to Wisconsin--but Tallon also said of Turris he
thought a year at Wisconsin to bulk up and Turris could be in the NHL ..to many of us we think more likely 2 yrs at least to gain that bigger body --but who knows?
The point is Tallon has saidmany things in different interviews including that it DEFINITELY would be either KANE ,TURRIS or JVR as the Chicago pick --he also said they would not trade the pick unless it helped the club IMMEDIATELY (so the speculation about trading down 1-2 spots with PHI or PHX seems out if they only included their other first rounder* -BUT not ruled out is a combination trade down +immediate asset kind of deal (* or ,possibly Tallon meant he would not trade one of his "final 3 " ="the pick" Chicago would take/settle for --but that means mAYBE
he would move down 1-2 spots if the sweeteener were PHI or PHX's second first round pick) --MAYBEwhat Tallon means is that he only would trade one of his final 3 (ie. move out of any top 3 pick position) IF he got back immediate assets oran immmediate asset +lower first round pick than the Top 3...
In other words TALLON still is keeping his options open... Itmay indeed be Kane--but perhaps not --you cannot go by just 1 of his varied statements which are also subject to some interpretation as to what he really means.
brylin18
Registered User
Ad
Upcoming events
-
-
-
HC Dynamo Pardubice @ Ocelari Trinec - Pardubice leads series 3-2Wagers: 1Staked: $15.00Event closes- Updated:
-
Tappara Tampere @ Pelicans Lahti - Tappara leads series 2-1Wagers: 1Staked: $15.00Event closes- Updated:
-
Eisbaren Berlin @ Pinguins Bremerhaven - Eisbaren Berlin leads series 3-1Wagers: 1Staked: $15.00Event closes- Updated: