The way I see it:
1C
I think Nylander has the potential to be a good 1C, though time will tell if he's:
a) A centre at all (at the NHL level)
b) Good enough to be a good 1C
My guess is that Kadri will be a good 2C at his peak, but I don't think him being a good 1C is completely impossible, just a bit unlikely.
1D
Phaneuf is a low end 1D, definitely not a great one, but passable. I'm confident Rielly will mature into a top pairing dman, but "good 1D" is up in the air, could go either way.
1G
I personally think Bernier is a good starting goalie, and I think he will remain that way for quite a long time.
So, I see us being fairly set in goal, but 1C and 1D are more in the "wait a few years, see how the young guys develop" range. At least we have young players who have decent shots to fill these roles in the future, though.
1C
I think Nylander has the potential to be a good 1C, though time will tell if he's:
a) A centre at all (at the NHL level)
b) Good enough to be a good 1C
My guess is that Kadri will be a good 2C at his peak, but I don't think him being a good 1C is completely impossible, just a bit unlikely.
1D
Phaneuf is a low end 1D, definitely not a great one, but passable. I'm confident Rielly will mature into a top pairing dman, but "good 1D" is up in the air, could go either way.
1G
I personally think Bernier is a good starting goalie, and I think he will remain that way for quite a long time.
So, I see us being fairly set in goal, but 1C and 1D are more in the "wait a few years, see how the young guys develop" range. At least we have young players who have decent shots to fill these roles in the future, though.