SwedishFire
Registered User
- Mar 3, 2011
- 5,332
- 1,863
Cant have all of those super Ds.I think the loss of Larsson hurt this team more. Hard veteran defender and leader. We see the value he has on a veteran d-corp backbone on a young Kraken franchise. This team navigated around the Klefbom LTIR but losing both he and Larsson were killer. This team with a troika of Nurse, Keith and Larsson would have given quality veteran leadership and defending styles that you can build around. Alas, not to be however.
Optimal world I think this team needs a 1D to complement Nurse (an unlikely get) and a veteran quality physical goal suppression type in second pair defense (which is do-able with a price to be paid). There's duplication between Barrie and Bouchard. Likely Barrie but he would have to be moved in a hockey deal, not given away as a quality veteran d lost as a cap dump.
This team needs two quality veteran defenders to be anywhere near adequate for a Cup chasing window, imo.
I wonder if Ceci wss Larssons replacement, or would been catched anyway.
But yes. I would trade Broberg imideatly for a steady D, to support Bouchard who is a good player, but Batrrie duplication - wich is stupid to the max.
Broberg could be kept as he is a bit diffrent, but not much diffrence.
Larsson, Gavrikov, Edmundsson. Any other D is a MUST. And Ive heard Holland scans the market for a 3C. Okey..??
Well, Ok, it makes great forward depth. But still, where to go with poorly constructed, limited D. He better rip it of. Wich one to keep between Barri3, Bouchard, Broberg. I think one HAS to go. And get another type of D.