MrBurghundy
I may be older but I'm never forgetting #47 & #41
Malkin was in God mode and there were Hornqvist on those PPs.
I actually really miss Neal and Niskanen on PPs.
At least they knew how to shoot the damn puck, if nothing else...
Malkin was in God mode and there were Hornqvist on those PPs.
I actually really miss Neal and Niskanen on PPs.
-about 4 shifts a piece full of energy then nothing
-bad puck support with poorly moved pucks from the back end
-reminded me of the Ranger game in MSG where the Pens couldn't handle the forecheck and the D were holding onto the puck too long with no support
-total stinker with no push back in this one
I'd say every d-man except Letang was pretty bad. Despres and Bort didn't have good games. But Scuderi and Ehrhoff were much worse. Ehrhoff was just panicking with the puck and throwing it all over the place. Lotta turnovers.
-------Ebbett over Farnham
As for the IcedCapp and Despres related issues.... .
There is no point even talking about defensemen playing bad in this one if the conversation does not start with Ehrhoff having his worst game as a Pen.
After that, Bortuzzo was really poor. Scuderi was really poor. Harrington didn't stand out much either way which probably speaks to him being among the better, and Letang mixed impressive with mind farts while still being our best D-man of the night.
If anything Despres was the second or third best... or as it was tonight, second or third least worst.
The D overall was not helped by the forwards and/or the coaching staff, because Montreal executed their system brilliantly, and we never adapted unless Geno and Sid took it upon themselves to make things happen.
Deserves to be mentioned how bad our 4th line was.... won't say it is down to Farnham being out and Ebbett had done well in the previous games.... but Ebbett the Weak and Adams the Sloth does not provide much for Goc to work with as a winger combo.
Plusses: Perron, Geno, Sid and kinda liked Rust also.
I mean, if they needed someone to play in the top 9, fine. That's beyond Farnham, from what I've seen.
But Ebbett doesn't do anything for a fourth, except put it out of synch.
Anyways, the entire D gets my minus. The first line my plus.
Only thing worse than the Pens defense were the refs. I don't remember the last time I saw so many blatant calls missed. As others have said, outside of Crosby, Malkin and perron, no real positives tonight.
Also, they weren't physical enough. This team only tends to play up to the physicality of the opponent, rather than setting the tone themselves. The Habs weren't real physical and we played down to their level.
We need to be setting the tone earlier, especially against a team with a lot of small forwards.
Farnham probably would've helped in that regard. But we can't really rely on one guy for that. Bort, Despres, Downie and Adams should've.
PP was much more organized too.At least they knew how to shoot the damn puck, if nothing else...
Letang and Ehroff were pretty bad in the third, killed a lot of the momentum generated by Perron-Crosby-Malkin towards the end. Scuds had a poor game, capped off by an atrocious giveway in that sequence where Despres had a guy hounding him, cut right in front of Fleury with the puck, then did a neat little spin-move and passed it back to number four.
As for Rust, he's the king of the "almost" plays. Almost scores, almost makes a nice pass. Not quite, but almost.
I'm starting to really question this coaching staff. MJ seems every bit as clueless with lineup decisions and line combinations as Bylsma, and Tocchet is seemingly clueless when it comes to the PP.
I don't think I would call that a "neat" move. That was a desperate move that followed a terrible terrible decision. The puck got to Scuderi about a half second before the Habs player did. I'm not a fan of Scuds, but that play was all Despres' bad.