If we were to trade Kessel what would we get in return?
No, similar production taking into account the number of games played. 24 in 56 vs 27 in 66. Or 0.43 ppg vs. 0.41 ppg. I don't consider that a meaningful difference.Similar production but Malkin has played 10 less games. You are right that Malkin's ES production isn't particularly impressive this year. That doesn't make his PP production any less impressive.
No, similar production taking into account the number of games played. 24 in 56 vs 27 in 66. Or 0.43 ppg vs. 0.41 ppg. I don't consider that a meaningful difference.
And I wasn't trying to imply PP production is meaningless. I've just been reading how people expect certain things based on a player's cap hit. 30ish ES points is in the ballpark of what certain wingers we've tossed aside for not being good enough produce flanking lesser centers on other teams. Wingers that were considered overpaid at $4M.
This has probably been asked a thousand times, so forgive me, but what is Kessel’s NTC now? Does he even have one? I thought it was scrapped once he agrees to be traded. The Pens got a sweet deal on him because he was only willing to be traded to a few teams and of those few teams, the Pens were the only one interested. If he doesn’t have a NTC, that opens up the possibilities a little bit. I don’t think they should trade him yet, but it would be nice to have that option.We wouldn't get anything because we wouldn't be able to trade him. Last summer, there was only 1 team heavily interested in him that was on his NTC: the Pens. Add on another underperforming season (overall it has been, despite me being satisfied with his 2016 production) and not many teams are going to be interested in him. The Pens wouldn't be able to move him due to Kessel's big cap hit, a potentially stagnant cap and his poor play. It's not even an option that should be considered right now.
Sometimes shots are getting blocked...
That's a ridiculous release. If you're getting paid 8M for being a great scorer and you do that constantly, like he's doing it this season, you just pack your bags and go home...
If we were to trade Kessel what would we get in return?
Halak out 6 weeks (thats into the playoffs right?) so they are going to have to ride Greiss
This has probably been asked a thousand times, so forgive me, but what is Kessel’s NTC now? Does he even have one? I thought it was scrapped once he agrees to be traded. The Pens got a sweet deal on him because he was only willing to be traded to a few teams and of those few teams, the Pens were the only one interested. If he doesn’t have a NTC, that opens up the possibilities a little bit. I don’t think they should trade him yet, but it would be nice to have that option.
Greiss has been decent this year. Not like they need to ride Rick DePo. Besides, we always make mediocre goalies look like vezina winners.
Oh, OK. Thanks. I thought he had a full-NTC with Toronto, so that makes sense then. I expect him to be better next year as well, but again, it would be nice to have the option.He still has an 8 team NTC. It didn't disappear because he didn't waive it to come to Pittsburgh, they were one of the 8 teams on that list. If he had a full NTC or if he had to waive to come to Pittsburgh, it would have disappeared.
It's a moot point though, there's no way the Pens consider moving Kessel unless he struggles again next year, which I find very doubtful. Just like Crosby isn't going to be a barely PPG player next year, I don't think Kessel is going to be a mid 50s point player next year. I'd be shocked for him to not hit at least 65 points next year.
Before we start trading Kessel (which will be a huge PITA that might not only take a year and require that we eat another 2 million of his salary), it might be better if we just figure out how to get him shooting one-timers and firing pucks high. If he needs to use a different stick on the powerplay and just sit there after practice firing buckets of pucks into a shooter tutor, so be it. We have guys on the club who'd be willing to stay with him and work on that.
Despite how he looks, Kessel's a natural athlete. If a guy like Niskanen or, Hell, Clarkson can learn to one-time a puck, Kessel can certainly do it. Just a matter of whether an old dog is willing to put the time in to learn a new trick.
I don't even think this is necessary. Why not let Kessel use his passing from the right half wall? I really don't understand why Kessel needs to be 1-timing that shot at every opportunity anyway, why not play to his strengths there? I don't even think his 1-timer is bad either, I just don't think that's what he should be doing on the PP. Tell Letang to start shooting more (be more Gonchar and less Mark Sanchez) and have Letang and Malkin as the shooters on that unit.
Oops. I was using 5v5 points from stats.hockeyanalysis.com. That was my original claim; that they're virtually identical 5v5. Then I obviously confused myself and mistakenly referred to ES points instead. 5v5 was what I meant all along. I thought that would be the best way to compare.Where did you find those stats? NHL.com has Kessel with 31 ES points in 66 games for 0.47 and Malkin with 30 in 56 games for 0.54. Over 82 games that equates to 39 for Kessel and 44 for Malkin. Still not a meaningful difference and Malkin seems to be good for an injury every year, but it's a difference.
Although Kessel has definitely been underwhelming, let's not lose our minds here. The guy will still likely finish around 25 goals this season. Possibly more if he has even a 3 or 4 game hot streak. I know a lot of us, myself included, expected more(and rightfully so at his cap hit) but let's try to avoid having short memories. Gonchar, Neal, Martin... Sometimes guys need more than part of one season to get acclimated.
As 2015-16 problems on this team go, I'd say there's quite a lot before we get to Kessel. Geno's ES production/health, Crosby's first half was a nightmare, Letang still has bouts of being learning disabled, Maatta skates like he just crapped his pants, Bonino is the invisible man, Bennett needs to be resurrected by the Lord of Light again, Sullivan seems to be terrible with personnel, our biggest source of speed was just given the "day-to-day/dead" treatment, Fleury's shown some flaws in the armor post All Star break, Kunitz is still a thing that exists... I mean, put into perspective, Kessel and his 25 goals might not be the disaster some think.
Outside of Daley/Dumo/Rust/Murray, pretty much every aspect of this year's team comes with a "Yeah, but..." I think that's worth remembering when we start singling out one guy.
I dunno. Outside of "the vet", I'd say Kessel's underwhelming play is our biggest issue. The last two years he's been a soft ~25 goal, ~60 point defensive liability who makes nearly 7 mil per.
Everybody else is either living up to their paycheck or easily replaced.
I think he can turn it around. But this is not a player we can have around long-term if he continues to play like he has.