Blue Jays Discussion: The Good-bye Loup Version

Status
Not open for further replies.

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
I’m okay with this, especially if they are getting back another top prospect. Giles is legit, despite apparently having his own “baggage”.

if by "baggage" you mean a contender willingly stuck him in AAA permanently rather than have him on the team.
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
88,362
31,764
Langley, BC
Would it be better to forego Giles and get just prospects back? trading for a soon to by 28 year old closer seems like a good idea to buy low on the eve of a deep playoff run. At the start of what I had hoped would be a rebuild of sorts, I'm not sure.

There's always a market for good relievers at the deadline. Always. It's probably the most reliably tradeable asset a team can have outside of having extra solid starters to sell off (which doesn't always happen except in transition periods like with the Jays right now)
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Why? Better to bet on his underlying stats correcting his ERA and trade him this offseason, or next trade deadline.

the astros couldn't even stand having him on their roster.
 

Advanced stats

Registered User
May 26, 2010
11,657
7,565
While the supposed return isn't "terrible persay, it's still nonsensical.

What's the point in trading for a 28 year old closer? We won't compete till he's 30, and by then his arm is shot, or he signs somewhere else.

There's a scenario where we flip him, but that's a sell low scenario again, because GM's would know that we're up against a wall..
 

Mach85

Registered User
Mar 14, 2013
3,899
678
I’m okay with this, especially if they are getting back another top prospect. Giles is legit, despite apparently having his own “baggage”.
Agreed. Giles was traded for Velasquez and Appel+, back when the latter was still a legit prospect and the former has turned out about as expected (mid-rotation arm). We were talking about selling Osuna for pennies on the dollar, but we're buying a former top closer for pennies on the dollar whose decline doesn't appear to be stuff or age-related. Don't get me wrong, I still hate making the deal now from a position of weakness. But if it was going to be done, Giles + another good piece isn't HORRIBLE. Gimme Whitley and I won't really complain.
 

thehockeysong

Registered User
Nov 1, 2009
1,373
369
There's always a market for good relievers at the deadline. Always. It's probably the most reliably tradeable asset a team can have outside of having extra solid starters to sell off (which doesn't always happen except in transition periods like with the Jays right now)

100% on that front. I'm just wondering why they need to take him back in the first place as opposed to adding similar value in prospects now. Not sure why the jays need a closer right now.
 

Mach85

Registered User
Mar 14, 2013
3,899
678
While the supposed return isn't "terrible persay, it's still nonsensical.

What's the point in trading for a 28 year old closer? We won't compete till he's 30, and by then his arm is shot, or he signs somewhere else.

There's a scenario where we flip him, but that's a sell low scenario again, because GM's would know that we're up against a wall..
Not if we rehabilitate his value and flip him next year.
 

The Nemesis

Semper Tyrannus
Apr 11, 2005
88,362
31,764
Langley, BC
100% on that front. I'm just wondering why they need to take him back in the first place as opposed to adding similar value in prospects now. Not sure why the jays need a closer right now.

They can't get the really juicy pieces from the Astros right now, so rather than take some less interesting B-tier guys, they take Giles, let him get his **** together, and stand a chance of flipping him at the next deadline for something better than what the alternative offer from Houston was.

Basically it's like instead of taking $0.50 now they take Giles and figure they can turn him into $1 next year (or the off-season)
 
  • Like
Reactions: thehockeysong

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
Yeah cause of his freakout at the Astros manager.

tenor.gif
 

BAM

Registered User
Nov 21, 2016
4,048
2,299
I really hope they get Tucker or Whitley lmao...jesus christ what a bad trade.
 

Kurtz

Registered User
Jul 17, 2005
10,114
6,994
They can't get the really juicy pieces from the Astros right now, so rather than take some less interesting B-tier guys, they take Giles, let him get his **** together, and stand a chance of flipping him at the next deadline for something better than what the alternative offer from Houston was.

Basically it's like instead of taking $0.50 now they take Giles and figure they can turn him into $1 next year (or the off-season)

It's going to be hard getting the same type of value for Giles as we should have for Osuna, even if Giles rebounds...so let's hope the prospect add in is good.
 

Paladin2799

Registered User
Jul 15, 2009
2,237
58
They can't get the really juicy pieces from the Astros right now, so rather than take some less interesting B-tier guys, they take Giles, let him get his **** together, and stand a chance of flipping him at the next deadline for something better than what the alternative offer from Houston was.

Basically it's like instead of taking $0.50 now they take Giles and figure they can turn him into $1 next year (or the off-season)
I still don't like dumping Osuna. He was a staple in Toronto and one of the best young closers in the game.

You should build around that and hope to rehab him.
 

Mach85

Registered User
Mar 14, 2013
3,899
678
That's tough to sell me on considering his chronic attitude issues.
What chronic attitude issues? Swearing in the general direction of his manager once on his way off the mound? He's a loose cannon, alright. We're not talking about John Rocker here, or even Jonathan Papelbon. And Pap never had a problem finding work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad