The following is a Must this Trade Deadline

The following is a MUST this Trade Deadline!

  • Trade our injury prone D - one of / or both Gryz & Forbert

  • Trade streaky D Debrusk

  • Trade one of the Huggable Goalie Bears

  • Waive player X for Player Y in Providence

  • Do nothing

  • Other

  • No rentals

  • Do NOT trade Ralph Malph Lohrei

  • Do NOT trade Potsie Poitras

  • Do NOT trade 1st round picks


Results are only viewable after voting.

Blowfish

Count down ...
Jan 13, 2005
22,842
14,863
Southwestern Ontario
Have at it. Trade Deadline is March 8 3 p.m.

The poll says multiple choices however the poll is limited to 3...just because.

Added some additional poll questions (thanks for suggestions) and bumped from 2 to 3 choices...
 
Last edited:

sarge88

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 29, 2003
25,519
21,025
I picked the first two….with the mental caveat that they don’t need to trade JDB, just have some closure to this mess.

I’m fine with him re-signing (for the right price) or being dealt (for the right return).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

wintersej

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 26, 2011
22,183
17,018
North Andover, MA
None of the above.

I’d rent a 4th liner.

I’d only trade Gryz or Forbort if more D was coming in.

Would only trade DeBrusk if I could get equivalent of a first in value or need his hit for another move.

Would only move a goalie if something presented itself that I couldn’t pass up.

I’d like to see Lysell get some action, but that is not dependent on the TDL

None of the kids are so special that there aren’t deals that I wouldn’t say yes to. Bergeron, Pasta, McAvoy. Those kids were untouchable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blowfish

BamBamCam

Registered User
Apr 12, 2011
1,792
889
Crowsnest Pass AB
None of the above.

I’d rent a 4th liner.

I’d only trade Gryz or Forbort if more D was coming in.

Would only trade DeBrusk if I could get equivalent of a first in value or need his hit for another move.


Would only move a goalie if something presented itself that I couldn’t pass up.

I’d like to see Lysell get some action, but that is not dependent on the TDL

None of the kids are so special that there aren’t deals that I wouldn’t say yes to. Bergeron, Pasta, McAvoy. Those kids were untouchable.
So you let Gryz, Forbort and Debrusk walk for nothing. Leaving the Cupboards more bare.
 

AngryMilkcrates

End of an Era
Jun 4, 2016
16,377
26,066
What do you think you are getting for Gryz or Forbort or DeBrusk if they suck so much?
If they hold on to Jake because the offers are paltry for him Don will be blamed.
If they trade him for lesser value than fans here have for Jake Don will be blamed.
If they don't sign Jake, Don will be blamed.
If they do sign Jake, Don will be blamed.

I feel like I know how the next 6 months will go on here.
 

BruinDust

Registered User
Aug 2, 2005
24,372
21,820
I said don't trade Poitras and Lohrei.

People are freaking out over on the main board because Dallas didn't give up Logan Stankoven or Maverick Bourque in the deal.

Newflash, NHL GMs don't give up top end prospects for rentals. They just don't. One time they did, but they don't anymore.

The rental market, even the high end market, you're talking B-level prospects. In both the Lindholm and Tanev deals, Calgary failed to get a single A-level elite prospect.
 

BMC

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 26, 2003
69,919
60,083
The Quiet Corner
Trade Gryz & Forbort for picks, I doubt they would bring other players back.
Trade DeBrusk- I am done with his inconsistency. Get someone for him before letting him walk as a UFA.
No rentals- if we get anyone for those 3 make sure they're signed for awhile or signed to contract extension as a condition of the deal.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad