I find it incredibly hypocritical that people in NA want to ban fighting in hockey (where your longest fight might be ninety seconds) yet MMA and all its various spin-offs is one of the most popular and fastest growing sports in Canada/US.
This is a complex issue for me, and I am not in favour of fighting, but it's not a clear black and white issue for me. I thoroughly despise MMA and think that it's barbaric. It really bothers me that it is a form of entertainment for some, yet I have good friends who love it, and I've argued with them about it.
That said, as a kid, I used to enjoy boxing (Ali was my childhood hero and look where boxing landed him) and hockey scraps too, but the older I get, the more I dislike fighting for what it is and its known consequences.
Contact sports are tough on the body/brain. Lineman in football have similar issues with concussions and brain injuries from repeated head trauma. I suspect all contact sports have somewhat similar issues. Even heading the ball in soccer, a non-contact sport, has been linked to adverse effects on the brain.
As stated, the issue is not entirely black and white for me for a few reasons. I would like to see fighting removed from the game, no question. However, as long as the NHL and NHLPA condone fighting like they do, I think teams need to protect themselves from the thuggery of enforcers on other teams.
I feel similarly with nuclear weapons. I don't like them, and genuinely wish humans would rid the World of them, but until then, I want NATO to have them to operate as a deterrant. I would also say that the NHLPA has a part to play in this as well. It's clearly not only the NHL who supports it; it's also the players. While it's easy to point the finger at Bettman, the players believe that it has a place in the game and likewise support it. I think that the NHL would probably have to listen, if the players suggested otherwise.
Another thing that blurs the issue for me is my belief that humans are inherently violent by nature--particularly young men--and that sports are symbolic forms of warfare. I would be curious to know the impact of vicarious violence in sport. I do wonder if such events decrease societal aggression and violence rather than increase it, or if it has any impact at all. My initial thoughts are that contact sports--even violent video games for that matter--probably reduce aggression among young males within the larger society. I know that studies are mostly conducted looking for a correlation between societal violence and video game violence, but I'm more inclined to believe otherwise. There do not seem to be any studies that can adequately confirm a correlation, so it creates an endless circular debate. I'm really not sure how you could adequately confirm any such hypothesis, one way or another, but I do wonder why soccer hooliganism occurs at a non-contact sport, while fan violence at hockey games is far less frequent. I don't know the answer, it's just something that I've thought about.
Certainly documentary videos like this one about Boogaard and the many tragic consequences of hockey violence need to be thoughtfully considered. Ultimately, I would like to see fighting taken out of the game, but until the NHLPA is prepared for this development, I really don't see it changing.
Competition in sports is about domination. At it's heart, it is capitalist ideology playing itself out. Does that make rock concerts socialist endeavours.
We will always have young men willing to put themselves on the line for fame, wealth and glory. To what extent is the system responsible for protecting them? The Players Association and the league need to make the protection of players a priority, for sure. Still, when the league made visors mandatory to protect players from injury, what was the response of players who dropped the gloves? Where does the responsibility of the league end and the responsibility of the player kick in? Is it a league issue or a legal one? I don't know. It's complex.
If it isn't going to be eliminated altogether, I think that fighting should be more severely penalized, but I also believe that the players who actually play the game should be able to dictate the conditions under which it is played and what the consequences are for certain actions. They have the largest stake in all of this. If brain damage is a possible consequence of fighting, why wouldn't the players want to protect themselves from it? We make trade offs in life for our professions. We trade our time, our health, etc., but at what point is it not worth pursuing a particular goal? I think the tragedy of someone like Boogaard should give considerable pause for thought and a re-examination of how the game conducts itself. Ultimately, I do not think that this is a fan issue,
Replacement; it's a player safety issue, and it's up to the league and the PA to sort it out.