My take on the Beatles is I get why they are important to this history of music and why people have a deep connection it on to them but the music on it's own merit just isn't good. Many are overly simplistic, repetitive or just atrocious lyrically and musically. I know a lot of people don't share that opinion.
I fully understand people may not
enjoy The Beatles, but I don't think anyone has a right to say that the music isn't good (and from that I mean saying it with a definitive meaning), or on the flip side say that their music is the best thing ever. Music is subjective. As an example, many of today's rock acts I personally find unlistenable, but that doesn't make my opinion right, and others (who may enjoy said bands) wrong.
Now, for whatever reason (likely multiple), their general perception is that of the "greatest rock and roll band"...however, I tend to believe that they were definitely in the right place at the right time, and somehow their music has stood the test of time. So, they must've done
something right, because most bands don't have that musical longevity, especially if they only released recorded music for 8 years (as The Beatles did, from 1962-1970). They'll forever be my personal favorite band, and I'll always understand that not everyone will like them, but I don't believe that there's any denying their impact on future generations of musicians.