McMetal
Writer of Wrongs
- Sep 29, 2015
- 14,192
- 12,311
That isn't the process by which a bill becomes law... That's the process by which an AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION is made. If you don't know the difference, then your high school civics teacher clearly failed you.The process by which a bill becomes a law isn’t as relevant to what we’re discussing. If you void the first 5 amendments, it’s questionable whether you still have a constitution.
And again, there's nothing special or sacred about the first five Amendments. The Constitution is not a holy text, it's a legal document.
Oh, I never said it would be easy. Like I said before, as a practical matter, political polarization has made the Amendment process grind to a halt. The last serious attempt made was the Equal Rights Amendment in the 80s, and that didn't even manage to pass.This conversation, like a lot of things, is mostly about matters of degree. Modifying limits. If you infringe on the first 5 amendments, you’re going to get enormous pushback and rightfully so. At that point many of the objections may not even be about guns but about the gvt seizing more power.
The way you casually defend doing this is laughable. It’s a practical matter. The volatility at the moment is enormous. What you’re talking about is lighting a match.
All I'm saying is that the Constitution allows us to modify it as needed for the 21st century, if we had the will.