Flat Ronnie
Registered User
- Feb 11, 2014
- 5,582
- 2,976
Why not? He was great with us. We could use another forward with grit.Why?
Let's hope not
Why not? He was great with us. We could use another forward with grit.Why?
Let's hope not
Don't know why everyone keeps selling our lineup short. We're still just a stacked/deep as most. THE MOST stacked (?) - who knows. But its right up there with any team.
Its not always the team with "the best shot" at winning it all. We're right up there in the short list. Best part is he's wouldn't be relied on to bring it home. We already have 10 guys that have done it. He'll be playing every night with 5 fellow future HoFers, and slot into a lineup that he knows exactly what to expect.
This is turnkey for any veteran winger bringing brought in to play top 6.
Why not? He was great with us. We could use another forward with grit.
What scoring liner worth a damn are we gonna get for 2-2.5M?He was great for us, but we need a scoring liner
What scoring liner worth a damn are we gonna get for 2-2.5M?
Only option we have is a Hail Mary for Kane.
Tatar ?What scoring liner worth a damn are we gonna get for 2-2.5M?
Only option we have is a Hail Mary for Kane.
This is BIG
You don’t think a person who goes by “Big Gucks” is credible?Is this fella credible or what? Also tAmPa ChEaTiNg AgAiN!!
No lolIs this fella credible or what? Also tAmPa ChEaTiNg AgAiN!!
Specifically Goodrow because we are familiar with him and he played exceptional for us. Also, its possible that NYR might want to get out from under that contract.You are suggesting a trade and another team retaining, if we are willing to do that than Kane isn't the only option.
I don't think that's clear any more, I expect a big competition in camp between him and Raddysh
I'm going to throw this out there...just an observation from reading the boards. We seem to trying to rationalize or convince these replacement moves are equal to what we had. Does anyone honestly think this team is BETTER? I'm not even talking about improving...just close to last year. I'm hoping the other guys are rested. Lots of teams improved. Lots to prove.
How reliable is the source? I'd feel better with tarasenkoIf this report from "Big Glucks" or whatever it is (lmao btw) turns out true and the Lightning snag Tarasenko, this will be one of the best off-seasons they've ever had. DeHann is boring and effective, Glendening is a very good faceoff specialist, Sheary is no worse than Colton, Essymont has a full off-season and regular season to incorporate himself and Jeannot is going to be healthy. And if Archibald cracks the roster this is gonna be a bitch of a team to play against. We will have not only rebuilt the bottom 6 but will have replaced Killorn with an elite talent
You bet your ass this team is gonna be better
cooper gave raddysh more ice time than f***ing hedman in game 6 with our season on the line but sure he is getting benched for a washed up bogosianBased on what? 3 games? Raddysh was horrible defensively, he should never see another PK again. I don't see Raddysh playing an important game if we're fully healthy.
Based on what? 3 games? Raddysh was horrible defensively, he should never see another PK again. I don't see Raddysh playing an important game if we're fully healthy.
He's notHow reliable is the source? I'd feel better with tarasenko
cooper gave raddysh more ice time than f***ing hedman in game 6 with our season on the line but sure he is getting benched for a washed up bogosian
I'm a big Bogo fan but Coopers opinion is the only one that really matters here, and he was drowning Raddysh in ice time while raving about him in interviews. Combined with the offseason rumor that we were floating around a Bogo trade, I think that is more than enough evidence that RD will be an area of competition in camp if not Raddysh having the inside track to begin with. Might not be the worse thing either with Bogo's health.
I think they'll split time, one because they bring different skillsets and two because limiting Bogo's games isn't a bad idea but the idea of trading him is dumb, especially if there's an injury.
I doubt Raddysh has the inside track but we'll see.
This team no we’re not better we are a bit younger and faster and I see us as a playoff team. As far as a cup contender no but if you make the playoffs and get hot anything can happen.I'm going to throw this out there...just an observation from reading the boards. We seem to trying to rationalize or convince these replacement moves are equal to what we had. Does anyone honestly think this team is BETTER? I'm not even talking about improving...just close to last year. I'm hoping the other guys are rested. Lots of teams improved. Lots to prove.
We need a top 6 forward goodrow is a bottom 6 forward and that contract is horrible! I definitely don’t see the rangers wanting to retain 50 percent of it.Specifically Goodrow because we are familiar with him and he played exceptional for us. Also, its possible that NYR might want to get out from under that contract.
Seems like a mutually beneficial deal. Not one that would require a lot of assets going out. Which is great, because we don't have any.
People need to read this and hammer this in to their brains.I think they'll split time, one because they bring different skillsets and two because limiting Bogo's games isn't a bad idea but the idea of trading him is dumb, especially if there's an injury.
I doubt Raddysh has the inside track but we'll see.
People need to read this and hammer this in to their brains.
And people who think we are massively worse than last year need to seriously question being a fan of hockey. At best we went sideways, at worst we might be missing some goals if we don't replace Killorn's output even a little.
You think our -1000 fourth line is the make or break? Losing Coltons 16 goals on the third line but replacing it with Sheary's 15 is a huge down grade? Losing Killorn's goals suck, but we are better defensively as a whole squad.
Why is it so hard to maybe understand, that after Vasy's massive collapse last year, the team prioritized getting faster and better defensively. That's what every single signing did. Either got us faster or made us better defensively. f*** we might win a defensive zone draw for the first time in a decade.
JBB addressed huge holes and gaps that showed up last playoffs. Vasy looked human and it was because as a whole the defense blew their coverage consistently.
Listening to the constant whinging about how all the signings suck is getting pathetic at this point. You want to bitch about not replacing Killorn's production, sure I can get behind that. But the rest has been pretty good at addressing flaws that we had.
People need to read this and hammer this in to their brains.
And people who think we are massively worse than last year need to seriously question being a fan of hockey. At best we went sideways, at worst we might be missing some goals if we don't replace Killorn's output even a little.
You think our -1000 fourth line is the make or break? Losing Coltons 16 goals on the third line but replacing it with Sheary's 15 is a huge down grade? Losing Killorn's goals suck, but we are better defensively as a whole squad.
Why is it so hard to maybe understand, that after Vasy's massive collapse last year, the team prioritized getting faster and better defensively. That's what every single signing did. Either got us faster or made us better defensively. f*** we might win a defensive zone draw for the first time in a decade.
JBB addressed huge holes and gaps that showed up last playoffs. Vasy looked human and it was because as a whole the defense blew their coverage consistently.
Listening to the constant whinging about how all the signings suck is getting pathetic at this point. You want to bitch about not replacing Killorn's production, sure I can get behind that. But the rest has been pretty good at addressing flaws that we had.