Henkka
Registered User
So now just Jurco to resign, And I would Imagine that he will get a similar deal as to what Pulkkinen just signed for.
Jurco will get at least 100k more, but hopefully not over 860k.
So now just Jurco to resign, And I would Imagine that he will get a similar deal as to what Pulkkinen just signed for.
Jurco will get at least 100k more, but hopefully not over 860k.
Let's just hope he proves that's he going to be more than just a 3rd line tweener at the NHL level.
Why would you expect more than that?
I don't, but there are plenty of people that do.
If he was 26 I'd agree, but he started last season as a 21 year-old. Very few players with Detroit rarely make the team that young, if at all. He's got great size, is physical, and has elite puck-handling skills. He clearly wasn't ready for the NHL through an entire season. He should have been sent back down after a few months. Can't for the life of me think why people are so willing to give up on him so quickly.
I was talking about Pulkkinen. As a matter of fact, I am definitely not ready to give up on Jurco. I think he has solid second line potential. I personally think he is going to be a better NHLer than Pulkkinen.
What has lead you to that assumption?
I was talking about Pulkkinen. As a matter of fact, I am definitely not ready to give up on Jurco. I think he has solid second line potential. I personally think he is going to be a better NHLer than Pulkkinen.
Don't want to speak for Sean3250, but I tend to agree. Better physical attributes (size, skating, etc), better puckhandling skills (when he's not too afraid to actually touch the puck), and less one-dimensional (has shown the ability to play a checking role). Both have similar awareness in the offensive and defensive zones. The only clear advantage for Pulk is that shot. And most importantly, both still have to put it all together at the NHL level. I don't think there's a substantial difference, but I'd still give the edge to Jurco.
All Jurco showed last year was that he can be an NHL-AHL tweener. Glendening had more goals and as many points as him.
All Jurco showed last year was that he can be an NHL-AHL tweener. Glendening had more goals and as many points as him.
Isn't glenny like 4 years older than jurco though?
Pulk didn't show much in his callup either.
Isn't glenny like 4 years older than jurco though?
Yup pretty much, Glendening is 26 years old and Jurco will be 23 years old on Dec 28th.
Jurco had a 36 game call up the season before.
Yup, where he looked pretty damn good too.
I wouldn't say 'pretty damn good' but he definitely looked a lot better in that call up than he did last season. It baffles me why he looked NHL ready one season, but the next season looked lost.
I thought he did. 8 goals in 36 games is pretty good.
I agree, he sophomore slump'd hard.
I think next season if he is with Sheahan and Pulkks he could be 20/20 next season.
I wouldn't say 'pretty damn good' but he definitely looked a lot better in that call up than he did last season. It baffles me why he looked NHL ready one season, but the next season looked lost.
I would love to see a Jurco-Sheahan-Pulkkinen line.
I honestly think Babs got to him. IE he started to look bad offensively after he tried that really fancy SO attempt if I remember. I think he got reamed out for it, and told if he doesn't play heavy and stop the fancy stuff he is going down.
As I said before I kind of feel like Babs would have ruined Datsyuk if had gotten a hold of him before he had broken out offensively. I don't feel Tats or Nyquist would be as far a long offensively if he had a choice either. He had no choice but to let them play with all of the injuries.
I think Blash will better know how to utilize some of the young guys. He knows how they play offensively, and is used to relying on them to produce. He is still going to demand good two way play, but I think he'll be more open to them trying stuff.