Well you do what Carolina did, 1 year over value and then long term deal at lower value after that
In that case you run the risk of the player accepting a QO or going to arbitration every year and walking right to UFA.
Well you do what Carolina did, 1 year over value and then long term deal at lower value after that
If a GM in need of goalie doesn’t consider it, he’s not doing his job.
up to $1.38649 million requires no compensation
From the above to $2.100742 million requires one 3rd
The above to $4.201488 million requires one 2nd
To $6.30223 million requires one 1st and one 3rd
To $8.402975 million requires one 1st, one 2nd and one 3rd
To $10.50372 million requires two 1sts, one 2nd and one 3rd
Any amount over the above requires four 1sts.
I honestly cannot see ANY team going higher than $6.3 and that would seem high also. Dallas matches that ALL DAY LONG.
hhhhmmmmmm Fitz!If a GM in need of goalie doesn’t consider it, he’s not doing his job.
Well that's just great.
Get it done, Nill. Tick tock.
No word yet on Robertson.
Well that's just great.
Get it done, Nill. Tick tock.
No word yet on Robertson.
If you are a goalie away from being a very good team it makes sense. But with any OS it has to be at an amount that makes Dallas back down and thus we are likely talking about a cap hit greater than Gibson’s $6.4 mill as the only others that are higher are price, Bob and Vasi.Id be offersheeting the shit out of him too if i were some teams... he looks like he will be an absolute stud soon... hes a stud now but eventually he will hit the ABSOLUTE stud status!!!
A $7Mx 6 year OS would be 1st,2nd,3rd compensation. If the goal was to land him that's about what it would take. If Dallas matches they'd be in a bind to keep Robertson.
The issue with 5x5 is that it only leaves 6.4 for Robertson. Robo wont take term at 6.4 and that is also on the low end for a bridge. Its a tricky balance. I think Dallas would be happy with Otter in the 4.4 range and Robo at around 7 on a bridge that expires when Faksas money frees up. That way we can shift Faksas money to Robo and use the Benn money to extend the rookie between Mav, Wyatt and Stank who makes the team this year.Demko got 5x5, gotta think that would get it done in a no tax state to boot?
I’d offer $7M without hesitation.
Idk if you think he's the real deal then 8.5 aav isn't that crazy. More evenup to $1.38649 million requires no compensation
From the above to $2.100742 million requires one 3rd
The above to $4.201488 million requires one 2nd
To $6.30223 million requires one 1st and one 3rd
To $8.402975 million requires one 1st, one 2nd and one 3rd
To $10.50372 million requires two 1sts, one 2nd and one 3rd
Any amount over the above requires four 1sts.
I honestly cannot see ANY team going higher than $6.3 and that would seem high also. Dallas matches that ALL DAY LONG.
Just barely as the AAV for the comp would actually be $8.4 mill as the NHL uses a denominator of the Lessor of 5 years or the term of the contract to calculate the compensation. $42 mill over 5 years.A $7Mx 6 year OS would be 1st,2nd,3rd compensation. If the goal was to land him that's about what it would take. If Dallas matches they'd be in a bind to keep Robertson.