monster_bertuzzi
registered user
rt said:How many of those guys are in the NHL right now?
Relax, he's making fun of our prospect pool.
rt said:How many of those guys are in the NHL right now?
tom_servo said:It's easy to get confused when the threadstarter himself names a few non-NHL players.
Ill take 1 superstar and 3 really good players over 2 superstars. In the long run not only will it be cheaper and easier to retain them. Nash, Zherdev, Brule, and Fritsche are a very good looking top 4. As a team, its more valuable to have that working for ya. Heck if you wanted to trade for good veterans to make a run at the cup, you got some good pieces to trade. Fritsche, Picard, Brule would get more return over Armstrong, Talbot, and Christensen.boredmale said:I see your logic, but the way i look at it is which group of 4 would have the most value right now on the trade market. Going on that basis, you have the correct 3 teams, but in reverse order.
chiefmonarch said:Ill take 1 superstar and 3 really good players over 2 superstars. In the long run not only will it be cheaper and easier to retain them. Nash, Zherdev, Brule, and Fritsche are a very good looking top 4. As a team, its more valuable to have that working for ya. Heck if you wanted to trade for good veterans to make a run at the cup, you got some good pieces to trade. Fritsche, Picard, Brule would get more return over Armstrong, Talbot, and Christensen.
Dr. kØUkLØs said:PITTSBURGH BY FAR
Crosby, Malkin, Whitney, Fleury, Kessel/Johnson