zeykshade
Registered User
Don't think I'm going to even bother picking through that wall of text diarrhea to point out the things that are wrong. Just not worth it.
valtteri plays two way physical game? .
Don't think I'm going to even bother picking through that wall of text diarrhea to point out the things that are wrong. Just not worth it.
I have followed the red wings for 35 years. Stevie was favorite player etc.. for his playing time. I think I know a little on what he does and why he does it based on his history as a player and office in detroit. I also think I know a little not enough yet but a little on how Cooper wants to set up his team.
Just because someone starts on 3rd or 4th line doesnt mean they dont move in time.
Connolly will be up sometime this year. Namestnikov next I see them playing 3rd or 4th line. Connolly might just become true power forward WHICH WE HAVE NONE right now and no one else NEAR -3 - 4 years out is next guys hart and erne.
You have to realize how the team works best. Palat Panik and Johnson have played together they are solid together etc.. I do not see cooper changing that line does he have them as 3rd or 4th line? I dont think that matters to be honest. They will probably stay together unless we go and change this team drastically which I do not see. That is not how detroit built up its teams.
Next everyone thinks drouin stamkos and marty are gonna play on same line? Really? I don't think there is any chance of this ZERO. Where is your great two way player or your defense guy or whom will play in front of net? NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
So for now Killorn is first line but think he does get dropped down to second next season because putting two of the best scoring slap shot guys in hockey with either marty or drouin makes sense and Kucherov is gonna be that good at slap shooting on a Stamkos level. Kucherov will also wind up being a good two way guy.
Valtteri purcell and drouin will be second line. With big responsibility on Valtteri for now and being weak in front of net so power play you bring up malone.
I figure malone is playing with thompson on fourth line this year and labrie etc.. except on power plays. Panik could work his way to that line but I do not think he has the skills. He is big enough not skilled enough.
So next year you have Drouin panik killorn connolly palat johnson ONE OF these guys doesnt make roster without moving someone like Tyrell I think Barberio gets a call up on D so we need to move a second player.
Next year have zero doubts namestnikov and kucherov make tampas team at start of year. Is all about the system. Is all about what will work best etc..
Everyone has connolly as trade bait etc.. I think is zero chance on that. I know you will say after this comment that he is not a true power forward does not play that physical. People train to do as told. If he wants to be a vital part of the future he will become that true power forward. Along with Korobov being more physical and Sustr learning to become more physical.
We are weakest in depth or anything at the power forward slot. Guys whom will sit at net and take a beating. We have only a few with the size to do that. Connolly is one of those VITAL FEW whom have the size and the hockey IQ and the shooting ability to become a good or great power forward.
If our team is soo good that great players are on fourth lines doesnt mean they are busts means we are a top level organization and that is where this is heading. Do you give up on guys whom get you 40-60-80 points?
Sustr and Korobov have been told to become nasty. Connolly was down in ahl full season to develop better two way game get more physical and become better in front of net.
Namestnikov in four years becomes our 2nd line center but not this year or next year. Will be when we have people like richard hart erne Gusev coming up and actually might see the russian 3 on that line valtteri playing forward!!
Also Valtteri not physical? He is super at going into boards fighting for pucks on both ends etc..
I know most people know very little on our prospects cause they actually believe Sustr is ahead of Korobov etc..
So your logic is say we look at chicago as an example and brandon saad and brandon pirri play 3rd line this year and Jeremy Morin say he is on 4th line they are busts?
Don't worry I got this
I personally don't see how watching SFY for all that time affects how you view his GM performance? Let alone his work for the Red Wings off ice, as how would you have any idea which moves he strongly supported or was against? So unless you are having deep chats with him and Cooper I think all of us are just speculating. Its foolish to call it anything more.
Ok is foolish he is using what he learned in detroit on how to build a championship team. How they drafted etc.. is honestly what I saw 30 years ago when he came up in the 80's till they became great in 90's. That is my opinion yes.
Don't disagree with you there, but surely for scorers its best to put them in an environment where they can succeed. I mean if the 3rd and 4th line is so good for developing scorers why was Connolly send down to the AHL last season, after his time on the 3rd/4th lines the season before?
I really think they put connolly down to work on two way game and get him more time to play in front of net.
Connolly will very likely be up sometime this year yes. Namestnikov I don't see, apart from maybe a cup of coffee in the NHL/injuries. As I think we can agree at the minute our centre depth goes, Stamkos-Filppula-TJ-Thompson. So without injuries who do you see him displacing?
Namestnikov I said next meaning next year not this year. He needs a lot of work. I would also like connolly down for a full year cause of his production fall off in playoffs.
Most people I talk to or on these boards think connolly will be traded I have a different view.
And I dont think Connolly is ever a true power forward, he doesn't have the build or mentality for it. And mentality is huge in physicality, Downie wasn't a big guy but he played like one. That's the difference. Connolly is a decent size, but he isn't a power forward. He's a dynamic scorer. That's his role. That's always been his role.
I hope he does have the mentality for it because its something we need and our options are slim in this department. I hope your wrong I think his weakness is two way play and he should get stronger in front of net.
Very few teams have true power forwards, which is why Malone was such a coup when he signed with us via UFA.
I agree is why we have so few options.
No one has said change the PTP line, it worked in the AHL, give it a shot in the NHL. Its a potentially great 3rd line. But then you compare it to Detroit, how many times has Detroit rolled an all rookie line? Tampa is not Detroit.
Detroit has never brought up guys before 23 years old I believe in like 15 years they are better at this point than we are. We need to bring up a ton of people unless something changes? Or we will not compete and we can compete.
Actually no one has said that, except potentially on the PP. And also great two way player....Marty St. Louis maybe?
This is where your argument really lacks consistency, you preach the Detroit model, yet you want a rookie to man the top line? Even Tampa has never done that. Lecavalier started on the 3rd line, Stamkos started on the 3rd line etc etc.
Killorn played 38 games he is not a rookie and is ready for top line.
I don't see your problem with having a net presence on every line, its not always necessary, you play to your players' strengths, not to a set of tactics.
Cooper likes a great two way guy or a net guy on his lines. He has stated this.
Panik is ridiculously skilled, have you ever watched him? His hands, size, awareness, physicality, all unmatched, he can play any style of game he chooses. To call him not skilled enough is insane!
Ok lets call him young. Others rate him above what I rate him. To me he has a lot to prove. He played 25 games for 9 points and killorn played 38 for 19. Killorn to me proved himself I expect more from panik. I know some people who rate his ceiling higher than kucherov's. I don't agree but have been known to be wrong.
Even with Tyrell moved I think one of them won't make the team. IMO Drouin and Killorn are locks, one of Palat, Johnson, Panik or Connolly won't make it. Agreed Barberio likely sees a lot of time, but I don't think that means a move is necessary. As Brewer, Aulie, Gudas, Hedman, Carle, Barberio, Taormina and Salo makes 8. I think Cooper will run with 8 d on the roster.
You think Taromina makes it too with Barberio? He is smallish d man and brings nothing to table that Barberio doesnt bring in my opinion. You are also first person I have seen said Cooper will run 8 d is interesting like the input. Just if can let me know what Taormina brings to table maybe I have been unfair to him?
People train as they are told, true. But despite Vinny's size and im guessing training how often did you see him use it? All the time, or just a fraction? And again Sustr especially, although to some extent Korobov just don't have the mentality to be big hitters. It's not Sustr's game and its only a part of Korobov's. Size doesn't mean physicality, just watch Teddy, big guy at 6 foot 3, 200+lbs and yet MSL plays bigger.
I dont ask for big hitters. Think we might have one big hitter in our whole system in erne. Gudas already being up that is. Marty as you said plays physical for his size goes battles wins board battles etc.. I would like Korobov and Sustr to develop into mean players consistently and agree Sustr seems lacking on that at this point.
As I said, its a mentality, I doubt Connolly ever becomes a power forward.
Hope your wrong.
How do you know Sustr and Korobov have been told to become nasty? I'd argue Connolly went down to develop his pro level offense.
Was definitely from twitter post from someone whom is affiliated with the team. I didnt just pull it out of a hat if that is your questioning. A lot of people were saying Sustr is ready for call up. They expected Korobov called up first if injuries etc.. caused extra call ups. Than stated that Korobov Sustr would play different lines and the front office wanted them to work on their physical play both of them. Sustr has the higher ceiling.
Flip is not physical.
Is plenty whom will say that but guy is always going behind nets and side boards and fighting for pucks. To me that is physical so you win the point? I dont need guys head taken off I need guys whom work on both ends and go into the dirty areas to consider them physical and will say we have guys whom do not do this without naming names.
I'd argue you know very little if you are expecting Sustr to become a bruiser.
Just know what read on twitter and they would like him to become grittier and develop a meanness
Pirri actually only played 1 regular season game, where he got nearly 18 minutes of ice time. Thats not 3rd line time.
Saad played in 46 games and averaged 16:27 a game, just 95 seconds a game less than Hossa. And was actually 5th in avg toi/g of Chicagos normal forward line up.
Morin played just 3 games averaging 13 minutes of ice time, which for Chicago is roughly 3rd line time.
I am talking the lines that are on chicagos main page that looked up today for projections of next season. So saad and pirri whom was awesome last year in ahl are projected 3rd lines and morin is 4th.
I understand this cuts down on minutes yet chicago has always mixed up lines if something isnt working. Tampa will do same.
So I think you are slightly misguided on other teams prospect development.
Connolly is not a power forward nor does he project as one. He's got decent size but he's a finesse over power type player. He's got more potential than any player we have besides Drouin but he also has high bust potential like Kucherov because of their style of game. Hopefully none of our players truly bust but that's wishful thinking.
Well I think Kucherov has zero bust potential the bigger the moment the bigger he plays he proves that every time he is on the ice so far. Those types dont bust they become the Kanes of the world.
Connolly to reach the potential we need will have to get in front of net. Killorn does it Hart is being brought along same way they had same guys working with Connolly maybe is why stats dropped in playoffs? I think he does develop that part of his game but I am a glass half full guy
I look at our prospect rankings and see seergeev as maybe second best we have coming behind KoekKoek on D and honestly think I am probably only guy whom thinks that
Going in front of the net, scoring garbage goals and fighting for the puck around the net doesn't necessarily make a player a power forward. Would you call Downie a PF? Killorn? Heck, even Stamkos?
A power forward is "the complete player", big, fast, hard to knock off the puck with soft hands and great vision, who possesses way above average offensive abilities as well as a mean streak, hitting and possibly even fighting people on a regular basis. Players who rank high in both goal and point scoring as well as in hits and penalty minutes. Think prime versions of Cam Neely, Rick Tocchet, Brendan Shanahan, Eric Lindros, Kevin Stevens, etc.
I have never heard of somebody comparing Connolly to today's power forwards like Iginla, Getzlaf, Perry or even guys like Lucic, Malone or Hartnell. IMO Connolly is a finesse goal scorer, comparable to maybe Thomas Vanek (if everything works out for him).
You lost all credibility when you said Kucherov has zero chance of busting. Ever player has a chance to bust there are no guarantees. He is immensely talented but we need to see that translate against men, lots of players lit up juniors but struggled in the pros.
Killorn isn't really a stand in front of the net player, he goes to the traffic area and the corners but that doesn't make him a power forward. I know Hart has good size but I haven't seen him play to judge. We also have no control over his development that's all him and his college coaches.
I would like to see Sergeev in the A before I go that far but you could be right. IMO it's Blujus, with his size and skating he can be a stud if he picks up his decision making and defense.
Just for the record: Killorn is 6'2 and 205 lbs, Connolly is 6'2 and 181 lbs (as per NHL.com). You keep saying Connolly has the size while Killorn is "not big enough".No Killorn is highly skilled not big enough to be power forward in my opinion but will get busy in those areas why think he makes it to top line this year. He has proven he will do what it takes. Others have him more highly ranked than me. I think he is adequate good player yet doubt reaches what I would consider great 80 point man etc.. kucherov think does reach that type of thing and connolly can. Yet is a lot of people whom put killorn over both of them. I am just going by how I see it.
Just for the record: Killorn is 6'2 and 205 lbs, Connolly is 6'2 and 181 lbs (as per NHL.com). You keep saying Connolly has the size while Killorn is "not big enough".
And again, both are nowhere near the definition of a power forward. Killorn might be feisty and a puck battler but he's not a body bruising agitator with a mean streak. He's an high energy player, great along the boards with well above average hockey IQ. With his style of play he fits on a energy or checking line just as well as a top line creating space and time for his line mates. He's also not afraid to get the puck on net which is a huge plus IMO. That's why he's so valuable to this team and the reason why many of us are ranking him above Connolly right now.
At this point in time I would still consider Connolly a high risk high reward prospect. He will either crack a NHL team's top-6 in the next couple of years or he won't be in the NHL at all. Again, he's got all the talent and skill. It's gonna be interesting to see if he's able to put it all together.
45 goals at least for Killorn?????? That's absolutely ridiculous, I like your enthusiasm towards our prospects but your expectations are beyond bad. Some of your comparisons are way off and you expect us to ice the entire eastern conference all star team. You say you have followed hockey long enough, you should know that not every player will become as expected and lots will just be mediocre NHL/AHL players.
I have observed there is no relationship between quality of posts and length, so I will keep it short and hope some do not think me a fool. The X can be filled internally, trade, or draft. In four years I do not see Teddy, or Textbook here.
Drouin-Stamkos-Connolly
X-Flip-Kucherov
Panik-Namestnikov-Palat
X-X-X
Hedman-Koekkoek
Carle-Sustr
Gudas-Aulie or X
X X
Vasilevskiy - Lindback
Text book is new term for me? Do you mean marty? I figure hes here in 3-4 years unless something slows him down. I dont see us resigning teddy. If stayed at 60 for 3 more years he would be outside of the budget I would assume. If falters figure give some kid his spot cheaper. I like the guys you name.
Textbook is Nate Thompson.
There are too many unforseeable changes that will happen over the next 3-4 years to predict what the team will look like that far down the road. Of current players (not including those controlled by restricted free agency) only Filppula, Thompson, Hedman, and Carle are under contract for the duration. I don't think we'll retain everything we currently think we'd want to. Nor do I think we'll just continuously slot in our prospects to fill all our holes moving forward.
Starting with Marty. He's under contract for two more years and 38 now. If the team does poorly next season (and there's a better chance it might than not) I think the window for trading him opens up at the trade deadline and stays open for as long as he remains. I think he retires or plays one more year for a contender after his current deal expires. I hope that extra last year is for a contending Lightning team, but, I have a sinking feeling it won't be.
Stamkos hits unrestricted free agency in 3 years. Yes, its too soon to start Stammergeddon back up, but, in the 3-4 years posited this will loom very large. I believe the cap space will be there to keep him and he'll be worth whatever he's paid. I could see circumstances pushing him toward wanting a fresh start elsewhere in a few years. I'll let this one go to my optimistic side for now and say we hypothetically extend him after the 14-15 season without issue.
I don't expect any of Purcell, Malone, Salo, Brewer, Crombeen, Pyatt, Tyrell, Taormina, or Lee to remain on the team beyond their current deals. Some may be traded, one may be bought out (amnesty), none will be extended. Aulie might be able to earn another contract, but, I'm not holding my breath.
Of the kids, Killorn and Gudas have shown they can contribute and are both likely here for the duration. Drouin and Vasilevski seem to be as sure as can be of being core pieces as soon as able. Everybody else is very much in flux over the next 4 years. They won't all make it and they won't all fail. They'll fight each other for the same spots and still have to out compete veteran free agents and/or trade acquisitions to earn their spots. If I'm gambling, I bet on Panik, Sustr, Namestnikov, and one of Kucherov or Connolly earning full time spots over the next 4 years. Others will get solid opportunities over that span but I wouldn't bet on their lasting success at this point.
Its tough predicting trades and free agency. I would love to bring back Downie and sign Hjalmarsson next offseason (both ufa). Two offseasons down the road I think we'll be looking for a 2nd/3rd line type center, a bottom 6 wing, and a bottom pairing defenseman. Might also need another goalie then if Vasi isn't ready and neither Lindback nor Bishop grasps lasting success. Then comes the 3rd offseason with its big Stammergeddon (ugh, too soon).
A final thought to consider when projecting 4 long years into the future, how the team performs over that time and how that alters things like incoming draft picks, coaches, general manager, current player values, etc. I won't be too surprised if we have another top 5 pick again over the next 3 years. I hope we're better than that, but still...I think another horrible season like that would bring deeper changes to the franchise than anyone can reasonably project.