Average ages are skewed by importance. This is a good post, because I think this is the most realistic assessment of young talent on an NHL team on this site (every other post is about how they've got 10 21 year old future Hall of Famers, and everyone else's team has a bunch of Alex Daigles and Peter Pruchas), but equating Marleau and Chara's importance is insane. In fact, Marleau could very well make the Hall of Fame, and at his best might not have been as valuable as a 40 year old Chara. Chara was the best defenseman of his generation by a wide margin, and is still great. When people say the Bruins are old, they just mean Bergeron/Marchand/Chara/Krejci/Rask, the core of the last decade (who feel like they should've won more), are all at the age where like "hey, if Bergeron looks human next year, it shouldn't quite shock us." Not what I'd bet on, but possible.