THe best roster is the one that you provides (or hopes) to provide your best edge in line match-ups.
If you lose a 1/2 goal spread (speculative and exaggerated, but making a point) by playing Cleary on the 2nd line, but gain a 3/4 goal spread by keeping scoring talent on 3rd line against lower competion....how is that not a better roster?
We can argue all day long about whether Cleary on 2nd line actually does this (Hell I don't even know that is does), but it amazes me that nobody sees (or admits to seeing ) the logic.
What is NOT debatable, is that the Wings have lived up to expectations, given the roster so I don't know how Babcock gets faulted.
Could they have done better? Possibly but again that is speculative. The Wings are in the playoffs and for now "on-serve" with the Ducks, thus you can not call MB's line-up choice a failure.
Ah, ok.
So they made the playoffs and lived up to expectations.
No point in trying or winning anymore.
And yes, we understand that having a guy like Cleary WAS on the second line can be beneficial to the overall make up of the team. It's not right now, at least in my, and many others fans opinions. Add in the fact that he's out on the start of many PP's when a guy like Tatar could be, and it's pretty sad.
Hell, through this I'm not even saying Tatar SHOULD be in over Cleary, but he SHOULD be in over a guy like Sammy, who's not game shape, and Eaves, who brings no dynamic to the team. He should also be in over Emmerton, but Emmerton wins 1 of every 4 faceoffs and is from St. Thomas Ontario, so, that goes to show you why he's in.
Playoffs is all about depth scoring. Tatar brings that, and he's tenacious.