BeezKnees
Registered User
Literally all of these deals were done by the computer boys
Ah. Scratch that one.
Literally all of these deals were done by the computer boys
And neither team was sustainable.
The 2012 team won the division with 94 points and a -24 goal differential. They weren’t very good as evidenced by how they finished LAST in the NHL the following season. 2012 was fun with the sunrise express and all, but it was a mediocre team that rode overtime losses to win an all time bad division.
as for the 2015. It’s the same thing. They rode the shit out of that 12 game win streak. Outside of that streak they played at an average 92 point pace.
you keep mentioning the problems caused by the computer boys but fail to mention all the messes of Tallon’s they had to clean up.
Lawson crouse
The ENTIRE 2010 draft, etc
the panthers had premium picks in two of the deepest drafts in history and went 0/4 on first round picks.
the myth that dale tallon was anything other than extremely mediocre as a GM needs to die. It completely falls apart the second you look any deeper than 2 division title.
He gets an incomplete because the most important players on the team were still their early twenties. Who had just started to turned the corner. RIGHT at that moment upper management decides to take control from him. This never happens. It wasn't like this team had been together for 6 years with a core in their prime and kept getting bounced the playoffs.You are only looking at the result and ignoring the extremely flawed process. Two fluky division titles should not mask the numerous critical mistakes tallon made along the way. And why the hell does he get an incomplete? After 5 years he had more than enough time to prove his blueprint and he failed. Numerous bad free agent signings. Numerous blown draft picks, etc.
you keep mentioning the problems caused by the computer boys but fail to mention all the messes of Tallon’s they had to clean up.
Lawson crouse
The ENTIRE 2010 draft, etc
the panthers had premium picks in two of the deepest drafts in history and went 0/4 on first round picks.
You are correct. Got my years wrong. However. That draft still had tarasenko and kuznetsov right there for the taking and tallon went with bjugstad and howden.What? 2010 was a weak draft.
You are correct. Got my years wrong. However. That draft still had tarasenko and kuznetsov right there for the taking and tallon went with bjugstad and howden.
No, but what I can isolate on Tallon is that he always picked the big strong player rather than the best hockey player. If he was between two possible players at a pick, he almost always chose the wrong one.15 teams passed on Tarasenko and 25 teams passed on Kuzy. The Russian factor was still alive back then. Obviously those teams gambled and it paid off, good for them. But this is not a mistake you can isolate to Tallon. Every gm thought that way back then.
No, but what I can isolate on Tallon is that he always picked the big strong player rather than the best hockey player. If he was between two possible players at a pick, he almost always chose the wrong one.
None of that is enough to rescue DT’s reputation in my eyes at least. The bad was so bad, his record is beyond repair.There is some merit to that, but I think this is a bit of revisionist history. Some first rounders and 2nd/3rd rounders(which he probably had some input on)that he picked, that were all either short or physically underdeveloped, or both: Huby, Grimaldi, Tro, Borgstrom, Hepo, Denisenko, Hutsko. Two of those guys are top 6 nhlers, another is a bottom 6er, two of them are promising prospects who should play at least a few years in the league. He did not pick the big strong player as much as you're making out.
None of that is enough to rescue DT’s reputation in my eyes at least. The bad was so bad, his record is beyond repair.
The ENTIRE 2010 draft, etc