For next season, Andrighetto. He has paid his dues in the AHL.
On the long run though I pick Hudon.
Neither.
Maybe Hudon.
In my opinion, Hudon is the better prospect between the two.
Andrighetto.
He's played 3 years in the AHL. He produced when given the chance and he's a right shot.
Hudon needs to have another good half season, though, I would have him in the line-up AS well.
I think our best lineup includes: Andrighetto, Bournival, and Thomas over guys like DSP, DLR, Flynn, and Prust. If Hudon's ready, all the better. I want us to be the fastest team in the league.
I honestly have no idea. They seem fairly equal in their development no?
Andrigetto shoots left but plays right or center,Hudon is a center is he not?
Being one of the best players in the AHL in his first season there, I can't see Hudon learning much more in the AHL unless we're talking about playoff experience. Both probably should make the big club out of camp or be very close.
In Hamilton last year, they played Bournival with Thomas and Andrigetto,not much,but was nice to see.
Now that PAP is gone, there has to be someone to take over his roster spot.
If you had to choose between Andrighetto and Hudon to fill that spot, who would you pick?
the lines in Hamilton were always mixed up. Ghetto played a bunch of times with Hudon though on the top line.
Hudon has really good 2 way play, i'd love to see a Hudon - Plekanec - Frolik line if we manage to sign Frolik, we could replace DD with Galchenyuk on the 1st line.
Hudon started off the year on such a great run, but as the season went on he seemed to wear down a bit and was heavily checked. Ghetto was on pace for about 52 points had he played all 76 games in his rookie year. The difference is that Ghetto doesn't have the two way game, smarts or grit to his game that Hudon has. But he's quicker, better skater and a better slap shot..
Agree with everything you said but you're missing Hudon biggest quality on the ice: he's so good at reading the play that he's always stealing to puck away from the other team. His anticipation is just amazing and that's why he's always dangerous on the PK as well. MT will fall in love for that kid.
For the poll : Hudon AINEC.
For me that falls under smarts, his hockey IQ is his best asset along with his skill. I do think MT will like him a lot since he plays a sound defensive game. What I like about him aside from being so smart is that he's got a bit of sandpaper to him, he will mix it up a bit.
Pacioretty - Galchenyuk - Andrighetto
Hudon - Plekanec - Frolik
Desharnais - Eller - Gallagher
de la Rose - Mitchell - Weise
We need to a move a defenseman (Gilbert or Emelin hopefully) if we don't want to carry 8 defenseman, which I hope we don't. If we could sign Frolik and keep DD, I would love to give both rookies a shot.
Pacioretty - Galchenyuk - Andrighetto
Hudon - Plekanec - Frolik
Desharnais - Eller - Gallagher
de la Rose - Mitchell - Weise
Much better competitor than Andrifloatto
I can never take anyone serious when they start with silly name calling. To me it just shows a clear agenda. I noticed it a ton in the DSP thread where instead of discussing him you would see immature posts calling him smith belly etc... It's the same thing here, you clearly don't like Andrighetto and that's fine as everyone is entitled not to like someone for whatever reason valid or invalid but for me it just means to never pay any attention to their opinion.
It's every post from his too.. He has some agenda against a young kid who put up 3 pts in 3 games then was inexplicably sent down to the 4th line.
I can never take anyone serious when they start with silly name calling. To me it just shows a clear agenda. I noticed it a ton in the DSP thread where instead of discussing him you would see immature posts calling him smith belly etc... It's the same thing here, you clearly don't like Andrighetto and that's fine as everyone is entitled not to like someone for whatever reason valid or invalid but for me it just means to never pay any attention to their opinion.
He was already on the fourth line for two of those three points, and it was not inexplicable.
I repeat he was already on the fourth line for two of those three points.
Fact, he was already on the fourth line for two of those three points.
Of course, on the first of them, he stayed out past his shift and inherited Pleks and I think Gallagher as linemates.
His second goal, against LA, came from Bournival as they played the fourth line together.