Success rate of pulling the goalie

Megahab

Registered User
Apr 30, 2009
7,168
1,264
Toronto
Does anyone have any stats on how successful teams are when they pull the goalie in the last minute or two of a game when they are trying to tie it up?

I wanted to how often the team with the pulled goalie scores compared to getting an empty net goal scored on them.

I think I have seen the leading team get the empty net goal more often than the trailing team scoring. If this is the case, then is it really a good idea to pull the goalie at the end of the game?
 

lirit

Romans 8:31
Dec 22, 2009
2,589
0
Agreed. If a team has nothing to lose.. why not pull the goalie and try?



This is a great example of where it worked. The Pens ended up winning that game.
 

Hermit Wizard Eater

Registered User
Nov 29, 2009
2,675
0
Colorado hasn't pulled a goalie all season long. Even with Budaj in net.

EDIT, oh... You mean when down late in the 3rd to try to get back in to the game.

Thought you meant because the goalie let's in a bunch of goals on a few shots.
 

Buck Aki Berg

Done with this place
Sep 17, 2008
17,325
8
Ottawa, ON
I think I have seen the leading team get the empty net goal more often than the trailing team scoring. If this is the case, then is it really a good idea to pull the goalie at the end of the game?

It's easier to score an empty net goal than it is to score on a 6 on 5 advantage. You can shoot a weak floater from centre ice, and with no goalie to stop it, it just has to be on the mark. Good luck scoring with a weak floater from centre ice with a goalie in the net.

Thing is, you're making a flawed comparison. Instead of comparing 'scoring the tying goal vs. having an empty net goal scored on you', you should be comparing 'probability of tying the game with the goalie pulled (factoring in your defense's ability to protect the empty net) vs. probability of tying the game while playing at even strength with the goalie in'.
 

MemphisMTLfan

Registered User
Feb 23, 2009
1,687
0
Memphis, TN
It's easier to score an empty net goal than it is to score on a 6 on 5 advantage. You can shoot a weak floater from centre ice, and with no goalie to stop it, it just has to be on the mark. Good luck scoring with a weak floater from centre ice with a goalie in the net.

Thing is, you're making a flawed comparison. Instead of comparing 'scoring the tying goal vs. having an empty net goal scored on you', you should be comparing 'probability of tying the game with the goalie pulled (factoring in your defense's ability to protect the empty net) vs. probability of tying the game while playing at even strength with the goalie in'.

I think so, but that's because it's not a true man-advantage. There are 6 players on each side. One side has a goalie and 5 skaters while the other has 6 skaters and no goalie.

Sometimes I feel like the pulling of the goalie could be handled a little better. Some teams wait entirely too long to pull the goalie IMO.
 

Reign Nateo

Registered User
Apr 28, 2003
13,561
59
Canada
Visit site
I've actually always wanted to see the numbers on this. It's still worth a shot and works out once in a while, but I would be curious to see some actual data.
 

RebelMe

Registered User
Dec 26, 2008
542
0
A few months ago I read an article about people who wrote a study about this problem. Their recommendation was that coaches in the NHL should try to pull the goalie much earlier than they do now, because the odds of scoring with 6v5 advantage are actually quite good.

Unfortunately, I can't remember where I read it...maybe some last years The Hockey News.
 

MasterofGrond

No, I'm not serious.
Sponsor
Feb 13, 2009
16,761
10,542
Rochester, NY
A few months ago I read an article about people who wrote a study about this problem. Their recommendation was that coaches in the NHL should try to pull the goalie much earlier than they do now, because the odds of scoring with 6v5 advantage are actually quite good.

Unfortunately, I can't remember where I read it...maybe some last years The Hockey News.

Yes, I believe I've read something to the same effect.
 

seventieslord

Student Of The Game
Mar 16, 2006
36,130
7,215
Regina, SK
There have been studies on this but I forget exactly what point they determined it would be the best to pull the goalie. But yes, it's common sense that it's worthwhile.
 

Telos

In Gavrikov We Must Trust
Aug 16, 2008
32,702
7,369
Reno, NV
The Kings have converted quite a few over the past couple of seasons. I think it is a good tactic, but this thread does have me thinking of what the actual statistics and percentage is. Someone needs to figure it out now :P
 

Inker

Registered User
Jul 27, 2006
661
0
I read an article a while back that broke all the stats down nicely. He came to the conclusion that it's better to pull the goalie with about 2:00 or 2:30 left in the game. There's a much bigger risk of getting scored on, obviously, but pulling the goalie with just 1 minute left makes the chances of scoring very, very low so you're probably going to lose anyways.
 

D1az

Registered User
Oct 29, 2009
1,363
682
Finland
A few months ago I read an article about people who wrote a study about this problem. Their recommendation was that coaches in the NHL should try to pull the goalie much earlier than they do now, because the odds of scoring with 6v5 advantage are actually quite good.

Unfortunately, I can't remember where I read it...maybe some last years The Hockey News.


I think that the fans would hate the coaches if they pulled their goalies earlier, thinking of how often empty net goals occur as compared to 6v5 advantages with a pulled goalie leading to a game tying goal.
 

Moobles

Registered User
Mar 15, 2009
2,555
0
There was a study done in 2005 that tried to be empirical, though it should be taken with a grain of salt, that found the highest success rate being at a pull of 2:40 before the game's over.

I'll dig it up later.
 

fronkjonk*

Guest
I saw a really long paper on this online. It did everything, like pulling the goalie on the PP and such. This was a couple years ago but I would bet it could still be found.
 

The Lunatic Fridge

why is my name here?
Aug 20, 2008
35,049
73
New York
PERFECT example

"Crosby, misses wide. 15 seconds to go , naslund...zherdev...to the net redden.......SCORE! Zherdev ties it with 8.1 to go!" Just listen to it with your sound up.The crowd literally goes NUTS when zherdev scores.The rangers also ended up winning in dramatic fashion.


I could probably resite that sentence in my sleep :laugh:

 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad