deandebean
Registered User
Maybe, jst maybe Subban really doesn't want to stay here long term like he's publicly saying. Maybe Bergevin knows this. Just maybe. Nobody thought of that?
Maybe, jst maybe Subban really doesn't want to stay here long term like he's publicly saying. Maybe Bergevin knows this. Just maybe. Nobody thought of that?
Yeah MB holds all the cards. Who the **** has said that?
You're doing a great Kriss E and LG impression, type type type, whine whine whine, same nonsense every post. No content. Hysteria. Misquoting. Strawman.
I don't have any time to explain things to people that can't learn. Montreal has CONTROL, look that word up FFS. That's different than "holds all the cards". Please I ask you, look the word up. And pass the definition on to your clueless friends.
I am sure we are beating a dead horse,Subban was no question given a weak contract last year.Any Habs fan or at least most put Subban in the top 3/4 in the entire league yet the Habs management either are too blind to see it or they just don't like him.
Here is the deal i have with the way they treated him.They have been oh so quick to give terrible hockey players big time money yet played hard ball with Subban.Not often do you get a kid who loves to play for the Habs,a true Habs fan with ALL the skills,these guys come around once in a lifetime.Chelios was the last,that is how long the Habs wait for such a D man.
When you sign floaters like Vanek and washed up guys like Kaberle you had better treat your true hard working players like Subban with a LOT more respect.
Maybe, jst maybe Subban really doesn't want to stay here long term like he's publicly saying. Maybe Bergevin knows this. Just maybe. Nobody thought of that?
That's the point people have made that if what PK is interested in is hitting the open market, bridge deal or not, he will hit the open market.
I don't think so either, that's why I don't think there was much risk of signing him to a deal that got him to UFA years.He would if he wanted to... But I don't think it's in the cards for him to be wearing anything other than the tricolore for a long while. I don't think Subban is dishonest in his love for this city. This is/was his dream, and to date, I do believe it's going quite well for him
I don't think so either, that's why I don't think there was much risk of signing him to a deal that got him to UFA years.
You clearly don't understand the context of this conversation.I clearly understand all the options...
BS. Montreal can't force him to stay longer than he wants to. That's up to PK.I don't have any time to explain things to people that can't learn. Montreal has CONTROL...
Tough to know because PK will be the benchmark in this new cap world. I figured 8 x 8 but we'll see. Either way its going to be more expensive than it had to be.9M sounds realistic.
I gave a lot of reasons why it could be that high in this thread or the previous one.
To be honest with you man, I think a lot of people (including the analysts) were surprised that he signed for what he did last time. The fact that he caved in that standoff was shocking to many and surprising to most. If he was going to leave, I think he would've demanded a trade back then.No, I'm not saying that he doesn't want to stay because of the bridge contract. I'm saying that he just never wanted to stay here long term in the first place.
To be honest with you man, I think a lot of people (including the analysts) were surprised that he signed for what he did last time. The fact that he caved in that standoff was shocking to many and surprising to most. If he was going to leave, I think he would've demanded a trade back then.
I expect him to sign long term with us.
There are no bonuses that could be given out to PK other than the signing ones which don't change anything for a wealthy organisation such as ours.Good point... I think a lot was going on organizationally for the Habs @ that time as well. Bergevin wasn't IMO in a good enough position to offer a massive contract then. There was a lot of question marks still on PK at that point.
Yes he was awesome, but he didn't arrive until the year After the contract. His value wasn't entirely defined as much more than he received at that point.
Now he has some elite status to show for himself. He's worth the long term value, and we STILL have 2 years before UFA.
IMHO, I will agree to disagree, and state that Bergevin did do the right thing by doing the bridge term.
All of the worry will settle after PK signs the huge anticipated deal. I'm sure the numbers are mind boggling already, and it's only a matter of figuring out where the deal should be, in comparison to where it is right now (ie dollar value, or term)
I think the nhlpa will actually appreciate the move in the long run, and see the Habs as a fair player in the fa market.
Most that have had the honour to wear this jersey, in the past while, I believe would say this organization does things very fairly.
We may not blow the socks off of people (contract wise), I do think we are reasonable in negotiating with those we have tried for.
PK's contract will be as complex, if not more so than Carey's deal. Due to that many more examples of salary and expectation levels around the NHL.
I.e.
On our own roster, we have
Markov @ 5.25
Emelin @ 4.1
Gilbert @ 2.8
Weaver @ 1.75
Tinordi & Beaulieau on their ELC's.
As it stands, we know PK's deal will be north of that. Heck, I'm pretty sure Bergevin doesn't pick up the phone, without a starting price above Markov's. But coming to a final dollar amount, is probably quite difficult for both sides to agree on. Especially when one is talking about a significant portion of their lives (an 8 year deal is equivalent to 1/3 of Subbans entire life to date).
It gets even more harder to finalize if there are any bonuses, which is very likely IMO in this case. Kind of like Lecavaliers 2 million dollar bonus I think he received today as an example.
In short, nothing I have heard from the Habs so far, has stated that signing PK has become anything less than top priority, in fact, I believe the deals being made are showing a fine example of a gm making the room for his star defence,man.
Yeah, you're right. It's just that nobody ever talked about that angle.
A lot of us thought this way initially. But it was widely reported by pretty much everyone later on to be 5 x 5.Because the narrative last time was "he hasn't done enough to earn a long term deal for doughty money," last time. He was pretty clearly seeking it. I don't see any reason for a change of heart.
A lot of us thought this way initially. But it was widely reported by pretty much everyone later on to be 5 x 5.
If it was Doughty money, a bridge deal might've made sense for say 2 x 5. But if he's only asking for five and he wants term, then give it to him.
Maybe, jst maybe Subban really doesn't want to stay here long term like he's publicly saying. Maybe Bergevin knows this. Just maybe. Nobody thought of that?
Mackenzie wasn't the only one reporting those numbers. 5 x 5 was widely reported.Mckenzie speculated a 2.5 - 3.0 M difference on a deal which was his guess without a source. Everything else is based on that speculation .
He also guessed that the situation would result in a trade. Time to conclude that Mckenzie had no real information, just as current negotiations are tightly lipped and he has no real information in 2014.
Mackenzie wasn't the only one reporting those numbers. 5 x 5 was widely reported.
A bunch of reporters aren't going to run on Bobby Mack's guess dude.They were speculating on Mckenzie's guess. Show me a report that quotes one party or the other of a 5X5 deal being on the table.
Other then people speculating on Mckenzie's guess.
There are no bonuses that could be given out to PK other than the signing ones which don't change anything for a wealthy organisation such as ours.
A bunch of reporters aren't going to run on Bobby Mack's guess dude.
As for a report... who the hell is going to have a report with a quote on it? That's the thing about leaked information, the sources usually stay quiet.
Across the board it was reported to be 5 x 5 and I see no reason to doubt this.
Yeah, it's all a big conspiracy on the part of the analysts. And all of us in this thread (except you) are in on it.Across the board has no source. Just like todays negotiation with Subban has no source.
you have no reason to doubt because you have invested 2 years in a lie you can't substantiate.
There are no bonuses that could be given out to PK other than the signing ones which don't change anything for a wealthy organisation such as ours.
And PK gave an interview to Stubbs making it a point to tell people that he wasn't looking to break the bank just get his fair value. Do you honestly think that PK thought his fair value was Doughty money??Mckenzie speculated a 2.5 - 3.0 M difference on a deal which was his guess without a source. Everything else is based on that speculation .
He also guessed that the situation would result in a trade. Time to conclude that Mckenzie had no real information, just as current negotiations are tightly lipped and he has no real information in 2014.
Across the board has no source. Just like todays negotiation with Subban has no source.
you have no reason to doubt because you have invested 2 years in a lie you can't substantiate.