First off, I, too, thought the posts by BruinDust and ODAAT were excellent.
I agree with the sentiments of this thread, even if purists think that makes me less of a hockey fan.
I'm willing to concede that part of the blame likely lies with me. With all the marvelous technology that has become part of our lives, I do feel as if my attention span is shorter and it takes more to stimulate me.
For example, I used to listen to entire symphonies even at home on CD start to finish. When I try that now, I find myself fidgeting or even skipping the 'boring' parts.
I'm 47 and remember the days when it was an absolute treat to be able to watch the NHL on television, even once a week or once a month. For the last several years, I've watched literally hundreds of games.
So I accept some of the blame.
However - I do find the entertainment value of the game - as a television product and a live product (I did catch the Bruins in Dallas this year) to be lacking, and not worth either the financial commitment or the time commitment.
I understand the ramifications of concussions and am OK with the NHL phasing out the fighting - in principle. But they better be able to replace the passion and energy. The thread on Boston/Vancouver is interesting, because while that was only four years ago, watching the highlights is like watching a different sport.
I'm of the belief Bettman is trying to grow the sport in non-conventional markets with utter confidence that the NHL's extremely die hard fans won't jump ship as the product gets watered down. He's likely basing that on how willingly we return after lockouts, compared to other sports (remember baseball fans were slow coming back after '94, and it took a steroid-fueled home run derby four years later).
Speaking only for myself, he's wrong. I'm not renewing NHL Center Ice, nor will I be making the trek to Dallas next year. I'm not doing it out of protest, but because I truly don't find it entertaining, nor do I find it worth either the financial or time commitments.