thaman8765678
Registered User
- Jun 11, 2011
- 4,956
- 6,894
I'd be thrilled to get Bichsel+I'm gonna go off the board and guess.
Pretty Good Prospect + 2nd/3rd + NHL tweener to replace Tanev
Lian Bischel + 3rd + Derrick Pouliot
(So you're essentially getting a recent 1st round pick, a 3rd, and a guy to play placeholder on D)
Brian Burke, Cammalleri. It’s a respect thing.well if you say it, it's got to be true... you'd never be wrong about anything
You don't have enough information to make such a stupid claim.Brian Burke, Cammalleri. It’s a respect thing.
No GM will take him seriously afterwards if he caves on the price for one of his prized assets.
If it is Bourque from Dallas - you'd be crazy to value a 1st over him.That 1st is coming or he’s not getting traded
You know it takes 2 sides to negotiate right? If I were Conroy I'd want Bichsel over the 1st because their pick could easily be #32 and would likely result in a lesser player.If the stars wanted to move the guy they just drafted in the 1st round instead of their first rounder I’d be weary tbh
It goes without saying that a 1st or equivalent would be accepted.You don't have enough information to make such a stupid claim.
Just because a 1st round pick isn't involved, it doesn't mean it doesn't have the value of a 1st round pick, which is the only thing that actually matters.
Frankly if we got Bichsel or Kyrou + a 3rd, I'd say that'd be better than a pick that could easily end up #32
You know it takes 2 sides to negotiate right? If I were Conroy I'd want Bichsel over the 1st because their pick could easily be #32 and would likely result in a lesser player.
I mean if you want to believe everything reported... personally I take all that shit with a huge grain of saltIt’s been reported that if a first was on the table Tanev would already be traded. So if Bichsel > 1st and was on the table by that logic Tanev would also be already traded
See above. If this was the offer Calgary would have already ran with it.I'm gonna go off the board and guess.
Pretty Good Prospect + 2nd/3rd + NHL tweener to replace Tanev
Lian Bischel + 3rd + Derrick Pouliot
(So you're essentially getting a recent 1st round pick, a 3rd, and a guy to play placeholder on D)
People are guessing what would get it done, not necessarily what the offer wasSee above. If this was the offer Calgary would have already ran with it.
That’s the point. Bischel is too much. I would not move him for a rental Tanev.People are guessing what would get it done, not necessarily what the offer was
I wouldn't move a 2nd for any rental without an extension, but you and I aren't the ones making decisions. Worse players have gotten better returns than Bichsel.That’s the point. Bischel is too much. I would not move him for a rental Tanev.
Hanifin will be gone for sure. He's been clear that he doesn't want to re-sign with Calgary.Flames won 4 straight and 5 points out of a playoff with more than 20 games left. Do they still break things up?
Terrible for Calgary.Lundkvist (if healthy by then) and a late pick? Stars already have Miro and Harley for the PP.
You know it takes 2 sides to negotiate right? If I were Conroy I'd want Bichsel over the 1st because their pick could easily be #32 and would likely result in a lesser player.
The Stars also knows better than anyone what Tanev can do in the playoffs, he and Markstrom were our best players when we faced them in round one a couple years back.They should be. Stacked forward group, some nice dmen but missing one steady top 4 presence. Tanev is exactly what they need.
Now give us something good you green f***ers
Yes. We are a mediocre team at best and can't afford to lose 2 good players for nothing.Flames won 4 straight and 5 points out of a playoff with more than 20 games left. Do they still break things up?