DownFromNJ
Registered User
- Mar 7, 2004
- 2,536
- 2
Bicycle Repairman said:...the rest of the draft is organized in order of regular season points outside of the lottery...
Bicycle Repairman said:I mean, when did this start anyway? A rather arbitrary decision if you ask me. Doesn't really address the issue of regular season parity if an underdog team wins the Cup. To me that's unfair. Powerhouse big money teams are affected only slightly.
Seems to me that if the rest of the draft is organized in order of regular season points outside of the lottery, then why should a Stanley Cup winning team be penalized when they should instead be rewarded?
Just seems patently unfair in my books.
Man, would that ever be a sweet deal for the Oilers!Burke's Evil Spirit said:In my ideal world, the team that misses the playoffs by the closest margin gets the 1st overall pick...
Seachd said:Man, would that ever be a sweet deal for the Oilers!
Flames would be a dynasty by now under those rulesSeachd said:Man, would that ever be a sweet deal for the Oilers!
Burke's Evil Spirit said:In my ideal world, the team that misses the playoffs by the closest margin gets the 1st overall pick...
Yeah. The Oilers would have had the top pick in 2002 and this year. As much as I'm sure to like Niinimaki and whoever they pick this year, I think I'd rather have Nash/Bouwmeester/Lehtonen and Ovechkin.looooob said:Flames would be a dynasty by now under those rules
NYR469 said:first off, the stanley cup winner dropping to #30 applies to the 1st round and the 1st round ONLY, the same as the draft lottery. so calgary would NOT pick last in every round, just the first round...
Seachd said:This isn't true. The Cup winner gets the last pick in every round. It happened to New Jersey last year.
The Devils traded the 68th pick (last in the second round) to move up to get Parise.Flame_Star_Devil said:Did it? I don't think so, unless we made a trade with out second round pick. Vrana wansn't the 60th overall.