Speculation: Stamkos and Reinhart

Rschmitz

Finding new ways to cheat
Feb 27, 2002
16,134
8,607
Tampa Bay
So why haven't the Bolts re-upped Stamkos yet and the Panthers Reinhart? What are both teams waiting for?

He's a PP specialist at this point, a damn good one, but his other 15 minutes of ice time a night he's mostly dead weight.

JBB probably didn't want to distract Stamkos with an underwhelming offer or prospects of a reduced role. Ideally next year he's not in the top 6.
 

pth2

Registered User
Jan 7, 2018
3,159
2,349
So why haven't the Bolts re-upped Stamkos yet and the Panthers Reinhart? What are both teams waiting for?
It's not like either team would be renting them out if they don't re-sign.... might as well avoid complicated negotiations during the season. Nothing good can come of it.
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
40,618
18,787
He's a PP specialist at this point, a damn good one, but his other 15 minutes of ice time a night he's mostly dead weight.

JBB probably didn't want to distract Stamkos with an underwhelming offer or prospects of a reduced role. Ideally next year he's not in the top 6.
Father time comes for us all.
 

frightenedinmatenum2

Registered User
Sep 30, 2023
1,290
1,225
Orange County Prison
When Stamkos hit free agency the first time, the Lightning did not offer him market value. He likely could have gotten more going else where. They let him test the market.

He is older now and on the decline. I assume it's a situation where they are fine to walk away. If he will return and take a soft deal, they will keep him.

I wonder if Chicago goes after him. They seem to have a strategy of overpaying veterans in dollar+term in order to insulate Bedard and create the right environment for him. I am not sure many teams would go 3+ years with Stamkos, almost like when Marleau getting the third year from Toronto sealed the deal for him.
 

Mrfenn92

Proud to be American
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2018
30,739
30,113
Chicago,Illinois
When Stamkos hit free agency the first time, the Lightning did not offer him market value. He likely could have gotten more going else where. They let him test the market.

He is older now and on the decline. I assume it's a situation where they are fine to walk away. If he will return and take a soft deal, they will keep him.

I wonder if Chicago goes after him. They seem to have a strategy of overpaying veterans in dollar+term in order to insulate Bedard and create the right environment for him. I am not sure many teams would go 3+ years with Stamkos, almost like when Marleau getting the third year from Toronto sealed the deal for him.
Would be nice in Chicago. Not sure he’d want to go there though. Seems like they are capping the vets to a 2 year high aav deals.
 

frightenedinmatenum2

Registered User
Sep 30, 2023
1,290
1,225
Orange County Prison
Would be nice in Chicago. Not sure he’d want to go there though. Seems like they are capping the vets to a 2 year high aav deals.

The way I see it playing out is that multiple teams offer him either 1 or maybe 2 year contracts at a high AAV, Tampa completely low-balls him because they don't really need him and aren't sentimental enough to pay him. Then whoever offers him 3 or 4 years potentially gets him.

Maybe he ends up staying in Tampa because at the end of the day, he's made so much money that it has very little value. With that said, if he is any sort of competitor, he must feel slighted at how both contract negotiations have gone.

If he is going to take a discount somewhere, and he has any sort of competitive spirit, he should go to a contender who could beat Tampa, not Tampa. That's at least what I would do, and I doubt I have the competitive fire of a pro-athlete. Maybe I'm just really spiteful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mrfenn92

IceManCat

#TheFloridaPanthers
Jul 13, 2006
6,106
2,605
The Rat Den
He's a PP specialist at this point, a damn good one, but his other 15 minutes of ice time a night he's mostly dead weight.

JBB probably didn't want to distract Stamkos with an underwhelming offer or prospects of a reduced role. Ideally next year he's not in the top 6.
Is this a joke?? Why don't you just admit you don't watch the team or the player instead of just reading stats?
 

IceManCat

#TheFloridaPanthers
Jul 13, 2006
6,106
2,605
The Rat Den
Lol, what Rschmitz said is the popular opinion on HF with Lightning fans. Stamkos is not a good 5 on 5 player anymore, and even on PP he'd get exposed without Kucherov.

It's insane. Reinhart has one of the best advanced metrics in the league. He plays center and wing. Wins face-offs. Can penalty kill. Is literally a Barkov lite player that can do everything. One of the worst takes I have seen on here. Not to mention that his metrics have been good for his entire career including on a really bad Buffalo team.
 

hamzarocks

Registered User
Jul 22, 2012
20,451
13,536
Pickering, Ontario
It's insane. Reinhart has one of the best advanced metrics in the league. He plays center and wing. Wins face-offs. Can penalty kill. Is literally a Barkov lite player that can do everything. One of the worst takes I have seen on here. Not to mention that his metrics have been good for his entire career including on a really bad Buffalo team.
He was talking about stamkos not reinhart
 

Mrfenn92

Proud to be American
Sponsor
Nov 27, 2018
30,739
30,113
Chicago,Illinois
It's insane. Reinhart has one of the best advanced metrics in the league. He plays center and wing. Wins face-offs. Can penalty kill. Is literally a Barkov lite player that can do everything. One of the worst takes I have seen on here. Not to mention that his metrics have been good for his entire career including on a really bad Buffalo team.
Think you didn’t read his post that well. He isn’t talking about Sam.
 

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
6,711
4,702
Dartmouth, NS
It's insane. Reinhart has one of the best advanced metrics in the league. He plays center and wing. Wins face-offs. Can penalty kill. Is literally a Barkov lite player that can do everything. One of the worst takes I have seen on here. Not to mention that his metrics have been good for his entire career including on a really bad Buffalo team.
The quote was about Stamkos. Not Reinhart. They bolded "Stamkos" in their response.
 

EquivalentStay

Registered User
Jul 27, 2020
277
393
It's insane. Reinhart has one of the best advanced metrics in the league. He plays center and wing. Wins face-offs. Can penalty kill. Is literally a Barkov lite player that can do everything. One of the worst takes I have seen on here. Not to mention that his metrics have been good for his entire career including on a really bad Buffalo team.
Sensitive much?
 

BoHorvat 53

What's a god to a Kane
Dec 9, 2014
3,772
1,963
Very odd choice.
What kind of term/money you think he signs with them?

He's pretty clearly not up-to-date with our cap situation, we have a cap crunch of sorts coming up with Pettersson and Hronek's extensions kicking in. There's 0 chance we can afford Reinhart (And beyond that, why would he leave the perfect situation for him in Florida? He'll probably take a slight pay cut and extend there)
 

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
24,727
29,423
I wonder if Chicago goes after him. They seem to have a strategy of overpaying veterans in dollar+term in order to insulate Bedard and create the right environment for him. I am not sure many teams would go 3+ years with Stamkos, almost like when Marleau getting the third year from Toronto sealed the deal for him.

The Blackhawks don't need a pure shooting RH on the powerplay, they've got that covered. And Stamkos isn't good enough at 5v5 to insulate anyone.

He needs to go somewhere where he can be insulated, and be a specialist. Something like Carolina, though they might be full up now with Kuznetsov on the books.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad