KrisLetAngry
MrJukeBoy
I have oel in there.
Tis true.
I just think your top 10 is missing people.
Obviously this is your opinion but I don't know how Stall beats out so many people.
I have oel in there.
Maybe the mcdonagh is the other ranger I'm thinkin of and when I put down Larsson I was referring to Oliver eckman. And I didn't put Karlsson in there cause he's total off. And I think Subban is totally overrated.
So how is that a horrible top ten when Staal is the only one you don't agree with?
Revised list since my first had some misunderstandings:
Weber
Suter
Chara
OEL
Kieth
Seabrooke
Mcdonagh
Doughty
Letang
Staal
Again I don't think it's that far fetched cause Staal is the only one nobody else seems to agree with so 9 outta 10 isn't that bad to me.
And also I know they're both former Norris winners but I love Karlsson but he's strictly offense to me and I hate Subban and besides his great shot I think he's the most overrated player in the league.
Staal shouldn't be there, and Seabrook sure as hell shouldn't be there. I don't know how you can think Subban is overrated and include Seabrook in your list.
In no particular order here's my list. Chara used to be there, but he's declined quite a bit. (I'm also assuming that Letang is playing the way he did this past playoffs and not the way he did in this past regular season.)
Weber
Doughty
Suter
Keith
Subban
OEL
Pietrangelo
McDonagh
Karlsson
Letang
You really don't think Seabrooke is one of the best?????
You really don't think Seabrooke is one of the best?????
Well I know this isn't to me but.
I'd take a lot of people over him.
I'm not even a Keith fan and I only put him in my top 10 because everyone else thinks he's all that and a bag of chips.
I said this in a thread during the playoffs and said I'd rather have a Martin and letang pairing over seabrooke and Keith.
That is just my opinion though
Well I know this isn't to me but.
I'd take a lot of people over him.
I'm not even a Keith fan and I only put him in my top 10 because everyone else thinks he's all that and a bag of chips.
I said this in a thread during the playoffs and said I'd rather have a Martin and letang pairing over seabrooke and Keith.
That is just my opinion though
why?[/QUOTE
If Mike Rathje was still in the league I'd throw him in there lol
Yeah Keith just won the Norris and will for sure be one of the best of all time OFD and playing both on great ends. You really have something wrong with your logic.
Keith>>>Martin-Letang>Seabrook
I really think Seabrooke is alot closer to Kieth than peoe give him credit.
Maybe the mcdonagh is the other ranger I'm thinkin of and when I put down Larsson I was referring to Oliver eckman. And I didn't put Karlsson in there cause he's total off. And I think Subban is totally overrated.
So how is that a horrible top ten when Staal is the only one you don't agree with?
In my opinion Marc is the best Staal at his position cause Eric never seemed to reach his scoring potential and isn't a top ten player in this league, maybe not even top 15. ....
Jordan seems pretty easily number 3 to me. Eric and Marc are both clearcut 1st line / 1st pairing players at their respective positions. Jordan is a 2nd liner. You can make an argument for either of Eric or Marc being the best of the three, but I don't see how you can justify Jordan being ahead of either of the other two. Jordan doesn't have the production to be a 1C.
I'd say Eric, then Marc, then Jordan.
Is Marc on a first pairing? I'm pretty sure he's not. At a glance, he spent only 20 minutes with McDonagh over his last 3 thousand played.
No, but he's better than Girardi, who is on the first pairing. Either Martin or Letang is a 2nd pairing d-man more often than not using that standard, and Geno is a 2nd line center.
I'm not sure he's played to the level of a top pairing guy since he returned from his eye injury. Prior to the eye injury, he was entrenched as a #2. After? He seems closer to a high end second pairing guy now.